Michael Mina Profile picture
Nov 13, 2023 12 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Wondering if you should get your baby the new RSV shot?

I’ve studied respiratory viruses like RSV, and their vaccines and treatments for years

Here’s a 🧵 of key info

We just had a baby last week

We chose to protect our newborn with it

And we’re lucky we could get a dose

1/
1) First and most critical is that the new RSV shot is very protective against RSV

In large placebo controlled “gold standard” trials it was ~75% effective to prevent RSV requiring medical attention in babies

2/

nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…
Image
2. It’s Safe

There were no indications of increased serious adverse events associated with the shot

In fact, there was a very small decrease in the number of serious adverse events in those who received the shot compared to those who got placebo

3/ Image
3) Although a lot of people, including doctors, refer to the new RSV shot as a “vaccine”

It is NOT a vaccine

It does not elicit immune memory
against RSV

It IS a shot of a *monoclonal antibody* against RSV

So, for ex., it wont cause a short fever like many vaccines do

4/
This is important bc the RSV shot is more temporary than most vaccines

The antibodies delivered in the shot are *all you get* - no extra antibodies are created by immunity

It’s most potent over first 3 months

That means it’s best to get near RSV season

5/
4) although many people hadn’t been aware of RSV until recently bc COVID raised overall awareness

it is a dangerous virus especially for babies and young children w >50,000 young children hospitalized in US each winter and hundreds of deaths

6/
5) Getting RSV in the first year of life also increases risk of being diagnosed with asthma

Those who avoided RSV in their first year of life had 25% less chance of being diagnosed with asthma (the mechanisms are still being explored)

7/

thelancet.com/journals/lance…
6) The RSV monoclonal antibody shot for babies is made by Sanofi. it is called Beyfortus or Nirsevimab

Fortunately it has been in high demand (bc it helps keep babies healthy)

Unfortunately manufacturing supply hasn’t been able to keep up so it is difficult for some to get

8/
CDC & others are working to try to ensure that supply can be fairly shared across the US (and world). Sanofi is working hard (from what I hear) to increase supply quickly

So if it’s offered, I wouldn’t recommend thinking about it until the next visit, the doses are limited

9/
7) Summary

RSV can cause serious disease in babies and increases risk of long term issues like asthma

The new RSV shot is highly protective

It’s not a vaccine but a monoclonal antibody

It is most effective for a few months

Supply is limited - if it’s offered, act fast

10/
8) additional info:

The monoclonal antibody that makes up the new RSV shot is an antibody that binds a part of RSV virus called the Fusion or ‘F’ protein

When the antibody ‘sees’ RSV, it binds ‘F’ and neutralizes RSV - preventing it from infecting cells in the body

11/
This is similar to infusions of monoclonal antibodies against the spike protein for COVID-19

However, unlike COVID, RSV is not likely to evade the antibodies in Beyfortus bc the site they recognize is highly conserved (can’t change easily). (and pop pressure is much lower)

12/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Mina

Michael Mina Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @michaelmina_lab

Oct 3
🧵 On Seasonality:
SARS-CoV-2 has "seasonality" as a contributor to transmission dynamics

People often refute it - So I made graphs and this thread

NOTE: Seasonality does NOT = "just a cold"
Many of worst viruses have seasonality

Transmission Dynamics ≠ Pathogenicity

1/Image
Image
Image
The first figure is Wastewater SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels averaged across the whole United States

See the REMARKABLE stability in the winter peak

The peak happens in the exact same week each year

Additionally, the start up the upswing to the peak (triangles) is also consistent

2/Image
A common misconception is that "Seasonality" means "no transmission out of season"

That is NOT TRUE

Seasonal forces are those that drive predictable behavior - like a winter peak in the first week of each year

3/
Read 14 tweets
Aug 18
Huge News for access to STI tests in the U.S. to help curb the growing syphilis epidemic

The @US_FDA just authorized the first fully at home OTC test for syphilis

A finger prick blood test for antibodies against the bug that causes it (T. Pallidum)

1/

nbcnews.com/health/sexual-…
For a number of decades, syphilis has been trending up in the U.S.

The cause isn’t singularly but likely is associated with relaxations of prevention of STIs in the context of more effective prophylaxis for HIV (PrEP). Plus general lack of awareness



2/publichealth.jhu.edu/2024/why-is-sy…
When left untreated, Syphilis can have devastating consequences on human health

Luckily there is very simple treatment for it (a form of Penicillin) but it only works if you take it - and you only take it if you know you have syphilis

Hence the importance of an OTC test!

3/
Read 7 tweets
May 3
Such a bad interpretation that stands to harm patient care

Let's not throw the baby out w the bathwater for COVID-19 (and flu etc)!

Suggesting to only run PCR & not rapid means most (50%-80%) of patients get WORSE care & at higher costs

Here's why:

A 🧵

1/
When I see publications & docs say “don’t use a rapid test, only use a PCR”

it assumes this is an OR only situation

Ridiculous!

A rapid test is… RAPID… and highly affordable

You lose ~nothing by it and give your patient the opportunity to GAIN tremendously

2/
If the test is positive, then for that 80%+ of culture positive ppl … your job is done immediately

You’ve spent $5 and 5 minutes and they can get on treatment right away

If you didn’t do it, it will be be 1-2 days and ~$150 before they can get started on treatment

3/
Read 10 tweets
Apr 20
Here we go again with this asinine cautious approach to testing for H5N1

CDC is NOT recommending that people with no symptoms - but who have had contact w infected animals - be tested at all… and certainly are not recommending a swab w any frequency.

Though we should have learned it in 2020, Here’s why this doesnt make sense:

1/Image
Firstly, tests are our eyes for viruses. It’s literally how we see where viruses are

If we wait until people are getting sick, we may have missed a major opportunity to find viruses jumping into humans before they learn to become so efficient in us that they cause disease

2/
So waiting until we actually have highly pathogenic strains harming humans - when we have a pretty discreet population at the moment to survey - is short sighted

3/
Read 11 tweets
Jan 16
A lot of questions still on:

How long should I isolate?

Do I need to isolate?

When can I go back to work?

Is 5 days enough?

What if I’m still positive?

Why am I not positive when I first get symptoms?

This thread below (and the embedded thread) goes through many of these questions
Now that symptoms start earlier w COVID (bc immunity activates symptoms fast after exposure)

A frequent ? that comes up is what this means for Paxlovid

Often ppl think it means you have to start Paxlovid earlier

Nope - Opposite! You have more time

2/
Bc symptoms start faster but the growth of the virus still takes about the same time as it used to…

Symptom onset today is ~2d post exposure where before it was ~5d

So, as far as virus growth is concerned, day 5 post symptoms (when the trials took place) is day ~8 today

3/
Read 6 tweets
Jan 8
A heartbreaking consequence of lapses in vaccination!

A measles outbreak is spreadinf in Philadelphia.

MEASLES! It sends kids to the hospital, erases existing immune memory (creating long term risks) and kills 1 in 1000

It was eliminated in the US, but we seem hell bent on reversing that

inquirer.com/health/measles…
A particularly deadly consequence of measles is its erasure of previously acquired immune memory - setting kids and adults up for infections that they shouldn’t be at risk from!

We found for example that measles can eliminate as much as 80% of someone’s previously acquired immunity to other pathogens!
science.org/doi/full/10.11…
Image
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(