"There's a lot here to source my proportionality post; but I thought it better to give you too much than too little. I include titles for each so you know generally the topics from each"
The protection to which civilian hospitals are entitled shall not cease unless they are used to commit, outside their humanitarian duties, acts harmful to the enemy."
"It's shocking how many in the media misuse legal terms in their agenda driven narrative & how belligerent they become when challenged by someone with actual knowledge? Why don't they interview a real JAG lawyer?"
LenGrunstein/status/1723045953328890286
-
/4
"Legal answers to accusations of apartheid, occupation, genocide, ethnic cleansing, unproportionality, Gaza as an 'open air prison'. Opinion."
The immoral distortion of legal principles to justify Hamas atrocities
Oversight Dems have received new emails from Jeffrey Epstein’s estate that raise serious questions about Donald Trump and his knowledge of Epstein’s horrific crimes.
- Oversight Dems
-
The images from Oversight Dems post above 🔼
Democrats intentionally redacted the name of the "victim" in the Epstein emails they released.
The unreacted version shows that it was Virginia Guiffre.
@CynicalPublius Yes, Google is misinterpreting the rules
“. . . information must be approved for public release by an appropriate authorizing official before it is released, even if it is unclassified."
This quote was fed into google.
-
I fed in the longer, complete quote
“. . . information must be approved for public release by an appropriate authorizing official before it is released by any military member, DoW civilian employee or contract employee, even if it is unclassified.”
- still misinterpreted
-
@CynicalPublius I believe that Google interprets this from an authoritative perspective. The authority is the mainstream press.
The press is using Google, and Google is parroting their thinking in answer.