FRΞΞ PRINCΞ Profile picture
Nov 13, 2023 4 tweets 40 min read Read on X
60 years ago, the CIA murdered the sitting President of the United States in broad daylight.
The media was in on it the whole time.
And I am going to prove it to you here once and for all.

On November 22, 1963, not only did John Kennedy die, but so did our free press, and as we have seen and continue to experience, so did our hopes for world peace.

Why was Kennedy killed? Who benefitted? Who had the power to cover it up?

Let's start from the beginning. What are the origins of the CIA? What was its purpose? Well, in 1947, the US had no enemies to speak of after WWII. There was no reason to create such a monstrous new agency unless the major objective was to create machinery to be able to control foreign policy in the United States.

The legislation creating it was not drawn up by an intelligence man; it was drawn up by a Wall Street man, James Forrestal.

In 1949, Forrestal was Truman’s Secretary of Defense. However, as soon as he began questioning US foreign policy, he was immediately committed to the psychiatric wing of the Bethesda Naval Hospital. And like clockwork, on May 22, he supposedly leaped to his death from a 16th-floor window.

Likely the first instance of the CIA ‘suiciding’ someone they wanted gone.

It is important to note that President Kennedy inherited the dangerous and growing Military-Industrial Complex that President Eisenhower warned about in his farewell speech. He also inherited their imperialist empire-building foreign policy that had already been successfully implemented around the world by the CIA.

The CIA was no stranger to meddling with foreign regimes. They had many successful coups under their belt at this point: Iran, Guatemala, you name it.

David Atlee Philips, the CIA’s Chief of Western Hemisphere Operations, even bragged that it was all easy. He said in an interview:

“In 1953, a few CIA people managed to make some changes in Iran that President Eisenhower liked very much.”

“In 1954, a few of us in Guatemala made some changes. It seemed almost without effort.”

All of this, of course, was applauded by our press. But not publicly known, the CIA had made plans to take over an even bigger country: the USA.

To do it, they would need to infiltrate and take over the media and the press. To win over the hearts and minds of the populace.

It was, and still is, the CIA’s most successful operation called 'Operation Mockingbird'.

There was no noteworthy resistance from any newspaper or major media corporation to our First Amendment being turned over to a secret government agency.

The once icons of independence became nothing more than press agents for imperialism.

Uncovered by the Church Committee hearings in the 1970s, Church found out that the CIA had over 400 paid or contract assets infesting the media from the 50s on.

They had a major influence over twenty-five newspapers, the wire services, and three networks; the biggest being CBS.

Other compromised platforms of note include Time Life, The New York Times, The Washington Post, Christian Science Monitor, New York Herald Tribune, Newsweek, Time Magazine, and Reader's Digest

On television, the CIA’s most successful voice was the prominent conservative, William F. Buckley, author of the CIA-funded “God & Man at Yale."

In a recorded staff meeting with President Reagan in 1981, when asked about the CIA and Mockingbird, CIA Chief William Casey said, “We’ll know our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the American public believes is false.”

Today, six major corporations own over 95% of all media. There’s no longer any fairness doctrine, no equal time provision; why do you think that is?

Before Kennedy was shot in Dallas, this was not the case. In fact, there were 1,500 different owners of television and radio stations. This quickly changed after Kennedy was no longer in the mix.

In 1962, the CIA approached President Kennedy with a proposal. An operation called “Operation Northwoods”. The proposals called for CIA operatives to both stage and commit acts of terrorism against American military and civilian targets, blaming them on the Cuban government to justify a war against Cuba.

The list of potential attacks detailed in the document included:

The remote control of civilian aircraft, which would be secretly repainted as US Air Force planes.

A fabricated 'shoot down' of a US Air Force fighter aircraft off the coast of Cuba.
The assassination of Cuban immigrants by sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high seas.
Blowing up a U.S. ship and orchestrating terrorism in U.S. cities.
The plan was drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, signed by Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer, and sent to the Secretary of Defense before it was rejected by JFK. What decent human being would sign such a thing?
Like I said previously, President Kennedy inherited and had to face two of the CIA’s biggest yet-to-be-implemented plans:

The Bay of Pigs invasion in Cuba

Attacking Vietnam
With the CIA’s Mockingbird assets in place, support for the CIA’s plans for Cuba and Vietnam were gaining public traction.

“First, I want to say that there will not be, under any conditions, an intervention in Cuba by the United States Armed Forces,” JFK stated.

Reluctantly convinced by Allen Dulles and his associate, Charles Cabell, that a modest invasion by mostly anti-Castro Cubans at the Bay of Pigs would be so well received by the Cuban people that it would result in a popular uprising against Fidel, Kennedy approved it.

From the beginning, it was a disaster.

In an attempt to salvage their obvious blunder, the CIA cried for air support.

Knowing an airstrike would belie his young presidency, Kennedy refused.

It was the CIA’s first failure. They were livid.

Interestingly enough, the CIA’s codename for the Bay of Pigs operation was “Zapata,” the name of George Bush’s oil company. One of the boats was even called “Barbara,” his wife’s name, suggesting that George Bush had more pull in the CIA than many people think.

Kennedy publicly took the blame, but he knew where the responsibility truly lay. He swiftly fired Allen Dulles, the longtime director of the CIA, and General Cabell, his deputy.

Note: General Cabell’s brother was the Mayor of Dallas at the time Kennedy was killed.

The gulf between Kennedy and the CIA had widened irreparably. He was quoted as saying he “wanted to splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds.”

At this point, the CIA media assets were now trumpeting the “Communist Menace” in Asia, along with the domino theory of collapsing nations.

But on September 3, 1963, on CBS, fifty days before his assassination, Kennedy stated there would be no Americans fighting in Vietnam. "We may supply them, but it is their war to fight."

You see, by 1963, the Central Intelligence Agency had become increasingly eager to involve the United States in Southeast Asia.

Unfortunately for them, they were faced with a President who had decided to withdraw the small number of troops they had there.

With Vietnam and its potential profits slipping away, the CIA was confronting its second failure, the most significant in its unchecked history.

Why Vietnam?

Vietnam represented more in terms of raw materials than any other location available to them in the world.

They HAD to get into Southeast Asia.

And the only obstacle was...

A man with reddish-brown hair, 6′1″ tall, 175 lbs, President John F. Kennedy.

For the CIA, removing him was akin to swatting a fly from a table.

At this point, their only ally in the White House was Vice President Lyndon Johnson, but rumors were rife that Johnson would not be on the reelection ticket in 1964. That would have been a certain Kennedy landslide at that point.

It wasn’t that Kennedy would remove him from the ticket; the law would. Bobby Baker, Johnson’s longtime bagman, was under investigation for bribery in a vending machine scandal. The investigation into corruption traced back to the 1950s, straight to Lyndon Johnson.

The CIA had to act so they could keep their man in office.

The first attempt on Kennedy’s life was thwarted in Chicago. Two Cuban nationals were found in a hotel room with several automatic rifles with telescopic sights, along with an outline of the route that President Kennedy was scheduled to take. No word of the other possible assassin, who resembled Lee Harvey Oswald, or of the two Cubans, who were never detained, was ever forwarded to Dallas, where Kennedy was next slated to visit.

A subsequent attempt in Miami saw the motorcade stopped, and the President flown out by helicopter. Up to this point, except for Castro, the CIA had a 100% success rate in eliminating heads of state. It was a secret program called “The Family Jewels.” Look it up.

One extremely interesting point of note was the other potential patsies. Remember when I said that one of the possible assassins resembled Oswald? He resembled him in more ways than just physically.

His name was Thomas Arthur Vallee. He had made open and loud threats that he would assassinate Kennedy. The Secret Service only picked him up when Kennedy canceled his trip to Chicago at 10:00 a.m. What one finds in Vallee and the whole Chicago plot are so many similarities to what happened in Dallas later that month.

Vallee, if we compare him to Oswald, is an ex-Marine. He had been posted, like Oswald, in the far east on a station that was linked to the CIA. It was easy to portray him as disgruntled, anti-Kennedy, a loner, and armed.

Vallee trained Cuban exiles for combat, which was a CIA responsibility. We know Oswald wanted to do the same and he most likely did.

Oswald was moved from New Orleans to Dallas just a month before the assassination. He was placed, and given a job in a tall building. It was a perfect killzone.

Vallee was also moved around like a pawn. He was moved just a few months prior from Long Island to Chicago just in time for the plot. Where does he get a job? In a tall building, adjacent to the motorcade, with the perfect killzone view. It would have forced Kennedy’s motorcade to do a sharp turn, slow down, and result in a perfect point where they would have had perfect triangulation of fire, just like in Dallas.

To eliminate their own President, with the help of the Dallas police and their media assets, would be a low-risk operation.

Shortly after John Kennedy’s arrival in Dallas, amid massive outpourings of affection, despite signs vilifying him posted along the way, and an FBI airtel informing Hoover of a possible assassination attempt that day, another warning came from the CIA’s George Bush of yet another potential attempt. He was seated in his limousine, which had no bubble top. It had been conveniently removed at the order of Bill Moyers, then a press aide to Lyndon Johnson.

Security was surprisingly lax. Just before leaving Love Field, a cameraman caught footage of Secret Service Chief Emory Roberts ordering his agents off the President's limousine as it began its approach toward Dealey Plaza. Originally scheduled to travel down Main Street through the Plaza, the motorcade route was changed at the last minute. The new route turned left on Elm, toward the Book Depository, a move that violated all Secret Service protocols for the protection of a President.

Not only was this route leading them into an ambush, but it also passed by the building in which they had planted the patsy. They were moving unusually slow as they passed the Depository, the target zone, going only eleven miles per hour, which is nearly stationary for professionals with rifles prepared to take their shots.

Abraham Zapruder, a clothing manufacturer, had taken the afternoon off to film the President. In moments, gunshots would ring out at 12:30pm. Zapruder's film would become the most famous and suppressed piece of evidence in human history. Jackie Kennedy is seen scrambling over the back seat to retrieve part of her husband’s brain. Motorcycle officer Billy Hargis, riding to the left rear, was splattered with blood and brain tissue.

Nearly everyone in Dealey Plaza rushed toward the grassy knoll, where the shots seemed to originate. The President's mutilated body was rushed to Parkland Hospital with half of his head gone. Dr. Malcolm Perry inserted a breathing tube into the trachea, noting later in a press conference, that there was an entrance wound to the throat and a fatal wound to the head indicative of an exit wound on the back of the head. This suggests the assassin shot from the front of the limousine.

Those tapes were confiscated from local TV stations, of course. He was later pressured to change his opinion during the investigation. Many doctors corroborated Perry’s opinion with their own and were also pressured to say otherwise.

Back in Dealey Plaza, witnesses told of multiple gunshots heard from different directions around the plaza. One particularly credible witness was a Deaf man named Ed Hoffman, who described seeing the shooter behind a fence but was dismissed when he tried to report what he saw to a man in a police uniform.

The official story we are taught in school is that a bullet entered the base of the President's neck, exited through his throat, and then passed through Governor Connally's shoulder and wrist, ultimately lodging in his thigh. Another bullet struck Kennedy in the back of the head. Three shots in total. One missed. This was all supposedly the work of a single shooter.

Note: The cause of death on the death certificate was a gunshot wound to the temple. Finding that death certificate is one of the most difficult tasks, as it has been buried by those who don't want it seen.

Almost immediately, Lee Harvey Oswald was arrested and the FBI quickly confiscated almost every single film and photograph. Colonel Fletcher Prouty, Chief of Special Operations for the Pentagon, was in New Zealand at the time. He remarked, “About noontime, we bought the paper. One thing I noticed was that the New Zealand paper had a full biographical story of this Oswald, a former Marine. On that day he was in, I believe, a T-shirt or polo shirt, but certainly not a business suit (He was wearing one in the photo in the paper article). This was on November 23, the day after the assassination, and you couldn't gather that much information on a relatively unknown 24-year-old that quickly. Somebody had prepared that story about Oswald before he ever shot the President.”

Oswald, in late 1962 and early 1963, had lived at 602 Elsbeth. However, that address never appeared on any of his application or employment forms for the Book Depository. Colonel Jones, with the Fourth Army Military Intelligence, received a call from his people in Dallas. They had a suspect named Alex J. Hidell. Jones said he went to his Military Intelligence files, looked up Alex J. Hidell, and found a cross-reference to Lee Harvey Oswald, which listed his address as 605 Elsbeth. What does this mean? Army Intelligence had tipped off the Dallas Police that the man they wanted was Lee Harvey Oswald.

Also arrested at the scene were three so-called “tramps” wearing clean boots who were escorted casually to the police department, fingerprinted, supposedly questioned, released, and all the arrest records disappeared. Colonel Prouty later identified the man strolling casually by the tramps as General Ed Lansdale, a known vocal critic of JFK’s policy of disengagement from Southeast Asia.

When he was arrested, Lee Harvey Oswald had two pieces of identification on him: A.J. Hidell and O.H. Lee. No one actually saw Oswald pull the trigger on the rifle that killed the President. Oswald vehemently denied killing the President to anyone who would listen. He was adamant that he was just a patsy.

It was claimed that Oswald had communist sympathies. However, the communist newspaper brought in as evidence, which featured his photo, was later proven to be a forgery. We know now that Oswald was not a communist. He was a provocateur. Having both connections to pro-communist and anti-communist organizations. Oswald was interrogated for 12 hours, with no audio or video recording permitted.

When brought before the press, the police received unexpected assistance in identifying Oswald's communist associates, not from a reporter, but from a nightclub owner in the back, Jack Ruby—more on him later.

Oswald then underwent a paraffin test to determine if he had recently fired a rifle. The results, available before the end of the day, were negative, contrary to the announcement to the world that the paraffin test showed he had fired a rifle.

Fingerprints were tested on the boxes on the floor where Oswald had supposedly been when he allegedly shot Kennedy. It turned out those fingerprints belonged to a large number of Dallas police officers and not to Oswald.

What also wasn't reported was the fate of the first rifle found on the sixth floor of the Book Depository. When discovered, the rifle had "7.65 Mauser" stamped on the barrel. However, when a cheap Mannlicher-Carcano rifle was introduced as evidence, the Mauser disappeared. In fact, the evidence used to substantiate the gun found in the Book Depository being Oswald's, is a receipt from a catalog in which he ordered said rifle. Turns out, they weren’t the same after all! The photos of the rifles are all off, none of them match. Some claim they took prints on the rifle, others say the rifle has no evidence of being fingerprinted at all. It is all a ruse.

What magically appeared, however, were bullet casings. Not scattered about on the floor, but conveniently placed on the windowsill. Three hulls were found by the window on the sixth floor, all neatly lying in a row, not more than an inch apart, all facing the same direction.

What also disappeared as forensic evidence was the Presidential limousine. There are photographs of bullet holes, or the fragments thereof, in the windshield and dashboard. The car was immediately sent to Detroit, where it was trashed and completely rebuilt.

Finally, Oswald was charged with the murder of Dallas Police Officer J.D. Tippit, a police officer who was killed the same day, and accused of attempting to murder General Edwin Walker.

Interestingly, President Kennedy had recently fired General Walker for attempting to indoctrinate his troops into a political advocacy group called the John Birch Society. Walker was not fond of Kennedy after that. No one asked Oswald why he would shoot a general who also despised the President if he hated Kennedy so much. And if he couldn’t hit a stationary target like Walker, how could he have hit a moving target through trees?

Oh, and nobody asked about the last-minute change to the parade route. At the scene of the Tippett killing, the bullet casings that were found did not match Oswald’s revolver. Oswald is captured on camera, swarmed by reporters, pleading for help, claiming that he is just a patsy. He knew what was coming.

Now, even though Hoover and the federal government had no jurisdiction, they initiated an investigation immediately, without being instructed to do so. The FBI took action despite the absence of a federal law making the assassination of a President a federal crime.

In reality, there was no true investigation. They had their suspect. Hoover is quoted as saying, 'The Bureau must convince the public that Oswald is the real assassin' and to 'wrap up the investigation... we have the basic facts now.'

He didn’t explicitly state that Oswald was the assassin, only that the public needed to be convinced of it.

As convenient as the lined-up shell casings were, an even more convenient discovery was a pristine bullet on a stretcher at Parkland Hospital. Remember Jack Ruby? A photograph appears to show Ruby at Dealey Plaza during the shooting. Later, two credible witnesses identified Jack Ruby at Parkland Hospital.

He likely had several tasks to carry out, one of which may have been to place that pristine bullet under the correct stretcher.

The truth is, in any fair courtroom in the world, Oswald would have been acquitted.

For some reason, the Zapruder film, a camera eyewitness record, was deemed by the FBI to have no 'evidentiary value.' That is preposterous. The film remained in the private hands of Abraham Zapruder, who later auctioned it off. Time Life owner Henry Luce, a now-known early supporter and participant of the CIA’s Mockingbird operation, became the highest bidder and new owner of the film. How convenient.

JFK’s brother, Bobby Kennedy, said that he heard about his brother’s death directly from J. Edgar Hoover, who, he claimed, took great pleasure in delivering the news. At this point, Oswald had still not been charged with the murder of the President. The Dallas Police were finding that their case against Oswald was disintegrating as rapidly as President Kennedy’s foreign policy and mangled body.

Doctors and hospital personnel complained that the Secret Service, with guns drawn, removed the President's body before a legally required Texas autopsy could be performed. In fact, they took over the entire 'investigation,' violating Texas state laws, over which they had no jurisdiction.

The Dallas coroner attempted to intervene. He stood in front of the coffin and everything. They moved him aside by force. Jackie, JFK’s wife, believed she was accompanying her husband's body on Air Force One, but it was transported back separately by helicopter.

Lyndon Johnson, en route to the White House, was sworn in as the new President on Air Force One. He is caught in a photograph receiving a congratulatory wink from Texas Congressman Albert Thomas. The entire media saw the photograph, and of course, ignored it. The CIA was back in control.

Lyndon Johnson, the new President, arrived in D.C. in the dead of night and addressed the nation, reading his expression of grief from a slip of paper. How genuine.

Back in Texas, former Dallas Police Officer, Napoleon J. Daniels witnessed Officer Vaugn, a current Dallas Police Officer, allowing Jack Ruby into the back door of the basement. At 12:20 p.m., November 23rd, 1963, almost 24 hours after the public execution of John F. Kennedy, the world was about to witness the televised execution of a man who would never see a trial. Jack Ruby shot Lee Harvey Oswald on live television for the world to see.

The patsy had officially taken the fall.

The news media quickly announced that Ruby killed Oswald out of sympathy for Jackie. But that’s not even what Ruby himself said. He stated, 'The people who had so much to gain and such an ulterior motive for putting me in the position I'm in will never let the true facts come above board to the world.'

When asked by a reporter if these people were in very high positions, Jack replied, 'Yes.'

Holy cow.

Jack Ruby was later found to have spoken on the phone with multiple people with close ties to the Mafia. Which, of course, had very strong connections to the CIA.

This was actually in an investigation that Robert Kennedy, John Kennedy’s brother, conducted soon after JFK was killed.

Robert planned to open up a big official investigation into his brother’s death as soon as he was back in the White House (he was running for President). He was also assassinated during his campaign, but that is a completely different story. Probably the CIA too, in my opinion.

With President Kennedy and Lee Harvey Oswald gone, any semblance of an investigation also vanished, along with our foreign policy and world peace.

Lyndon Johnson, within 72 hours of assuming the office of the Presidency following Kennedy’s death, reversed the foreign policy of the United States regarding Asia. He met with the Chiefs of Staff, and his message was, “Tell them in Vietnam, everything has changed 180 degrees. We’re going to back them 100%.”

Vietnam, here we come.

Decisions like this can’t just be made on the spot. Paperwork has to be completed, months of position papers drafted. Interestingly, one of the documents that needed to be completed was ‘memorandum 273,’ drafted the day before President Kennedy’s assassination by McGeorge Bundy. It completely reversed the Vietnam withdrawal policy.

Bundy, Kennedy’s hawkish military advisor, subsequently joined President Johnson as a major architect of the Vietnam War he had always wanted.

Any potential investigation into President Kennedy’s assassination, or Oswald’s murder, was completely thwarted by the new government with its questionable establishment of the Warren Commission.

Also gone: American journalism.

*Continued below*Image
At this point, there was not much enthusiasm on the part of the federal government to dig up evidence implicating the CIA in the assassination of the well-loved President. So, the chosen solution was to form a commission of 'honorable' men who would be reliable in diverting attention from the real truth.

On November 29th, 1963, seven days after the assassination of Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson established what was officially called 'The President’s Commission on the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy.' Informally called the ‘Warren Commission’ as it was headed by Earl Warren, the then Chief Justice of the United States.

At first, Warren refused to take the head of the commission because he stated the principle of law that a member of the judicial power could not be at the service of the executive power. It was only under pressure from President Lyndon Johnson, who hinted at international tensions and the risks of war resulting from the death of his predecessor, that he agreed to chair the commission.

He knew whatever conclusion they came to, it wouldn’t be the full truth.

Not one of the appointees was a Kennedy supporter. Many had been opposed by Kennedy, opposed him, or were outright fired by him. One of note was Allen Dulles, the former director of the CIA whom Kennedy fired. It is also worth noting that we now know that Dulles had a long record of assassination attempts in many different countries.

Dulles was lobbied by the CIA to be added to the Commission to make sure certain doors stayed closed. Dulles even went as far as to meet with and rehearse with CIA members before they were interviewed by the Commission to make sure they did not reveal any connections to Oswald, of which there were many.

Another such appointee was former World Bank chairman John J. McCloy, whose policies President Kennedy had publicly opposed.

Another point of note: Not only was President Kennedy’s foreign policy overturned overnight, but so was his domestic economic policy.

Earlier that year in June, President Kennedy signed Executive Order 11110. This order directed the Treasury to print money redeemable in silver. For five months, the Treasury complied. Had they continued, it would have, in essence, put the privately owned banking cartel, known today as the Federal Reserve, out of business. Can’t have that!

None of this was ever mentioned by the media.

These were the investigation hearings into the death of the President of the United States. There wasn't an editorial in the New York Times, the Washington Post, or any other newspaper in America for nine months as the hearings went on.

While these 'honorable men' manufactured 'proof' that Oswald did it behind closed doors, they were assisted by CBS.

Bill Paley, head of CBS, had been involved with the CIA since it was the OSS. He had always been a loyalist. CBS staked their credibility on this from the very beginning. At the very moment of the report's release, they aired a two-hour special endorsing it, before it had even been made public.

A recently released CBS memo reveals that the person helping craft their special was none other than John J. McCloy, a member of the commission that had yet to announce their conclusions.

NBC went as far as literally telling the FBI they would publish nothing that contradicted the Warren Report. Great journalism right there.

Now let’s talk about the autopsy. That evening, America’s top forensic pathologists, medical professionals who perform autopsies in the D.C. area, were on standby by their phones, but they were never called. The reality had to be inverted, and an illusion created to make it appear as though Kennedy was shot from behind, the direction from which Oswald was supposedly positioned.

Just look at the Zapruder film. No competent person can watch President Kennedy get shot in the head and believe the bullet did not come from the front of the vehicle. One method they employed to create this illusion was to seize control of those conducting the autopsy. They accomplished this by having the autopsy, in its entirety, supervised by Generals and Admirals.

The President received an autopsy that would have been unacceptable for an average citizen, let alone a President. Interestingly, Oswald received an autopsy befitting a President. There were no questions about Oswald’s autopsy, and there were nothing but questions surrounding the President’s.

Had this case ever gone to trial, those 'pathologists' would have been decimated on cross-examination by any competent defense attorney. The bullet that struck President Kennedy from behind hit him just below the right shoulder blade, as verified by the holes in his jacket and shirt. The Commission had the opportunity to examine the X-rays and photographs but chose to review cartoon drawings instead, which depicted the supposed trajectory of the bullet.

The Commission’s next task, with the help of CBS, was to prove that Oswald was a remarkable marksman, capable of firing three accurate shots in less than 5.6 seconds, as indicated by the Zapruder film. Oswald’s former Marine roommate, despite FBI harassment, stood by his statement regarding Oswald’s mediocre marksmanship; he just wasn’t that good.

Neither the Commission nor the CBS experts were able to replicate three remotely accurate shots in the allotted time, so they simply pretended that 'the assassin had more time.'

Nearly 60 eyewitnesses and ear witnesses reported hearing three or more shots from the grassy knoll. The Commission dismissed this, claiming it was probably an echo. Yeah, sure.

Motorcycle Officer Marion Baker encountered a composed Oswald in the lunchroom less than two minutes after the last shot was fired. The Commission had to prove that Oswald could fire that last shot, hide the rifle, and scurry down the stairs to the lunchroom within those two minutes. They couldn't. So, they just ignored it.

In fact, there was a witness who worked with Oswald at the Depository named Vicki Adams who gave her testimony to the Commission. It was destroyed, of course. Why? Because when interviewed later, she said that in that testimony she claimed that she ran down the same steps Oswald supposedly did as soon as the shots went off. She never saw him.

One witness isn’t enough? She was with another coworker of hers, Sandra Styles, who ran down the stairs with her. The Commission said that Vicki’s testimony was enough and then proceeded to destroy the evidence. Then in the final report they just shrugged Vicki off as another confused witness.

Once more documents were declassified, it was revealed that there was a third corroboration for Vicki’s testimony that, again, was buried and not considered. Three witnesses that contradict the Warren Report and prove that Oswald was not even on the 6th floor during the shooting? Not good.

Not wanting to wait nine months for the conclusions of these “honorable men,” Mark Lane, who worked on Kennedy’s election campaign, flew to Dallas and did what the Commission did not: interviewed actual witnesses.

Since the Commission’s hearings were secret, Mark aimed to publish an article about what many witnesses told him. Nearly no publication in America that he contacted wanted anything to do with it. Finally, he found the National Guardian, and they published it.

Oswald’s mother saw the article and asked Mark to represent her deceased son before the Commission. They said no.

The American public did not even have to wait for the Commission’s conclusion. Henry Luce, the Mockingbird participant we talked about before, proclaimed Oswald the killer on the cover of his Life Magazine publication. This is the first time in major American journalism that an unconvicted suspect was not referred to as “alleged.”

The Commission claimed that only three shots were fired. Since records show that one of the shots had missed, they further claimed that the first bullet, the pristine one found on the stretcher, struck President Kennedy in the back of the neck, passed through his throat, then went completely through Governor Connally’s upper body and wrist. The bullet that missed straight up missed the entire vehicle and struck on the other side of the street. Someone as professional as they claimed Oswald to be, it does not make sense he would hit two perfect shots and then miss the street entirely with another.

Governor Connally’s persistent assertion that he was not hit by the first shot should have dismantled the Commission’s claims completely. They had to prove that one bullet created all seven wounds. Good luck with that.

The magic bullet, they literally called it that, had fewer grains missing than were found in the Governor’s body. But don't worry. They had a "magic" solution for the magic bullet called “The Magic Bullet Theory,” which the Commission accepted, of course.

It states, “The bullet went through President Kennedy’s neck, without hitting bone, deflected magically into Connally’s back, shattering four inches of his right rib, exited under his right nipple, deflected downward, destroying a large bone in his right wrist, and then veered left into his thigh. It remained embedded in his thigh until he arrived at Parkland Hospital, where it fell onto a stretcher. Not Connally’s or President Kennedy’s stretcher, mind you. Just a random stretcher.

Are you serious?

The number of liberal foreign policy ‘experts’, like Noam Chomsky, who questioned the magic bullet theory: zero.

'Who knows and who cares? Plenty of people get killed all the time. Why does it matter if one of them happens to be John F. Kennedy?' - Chomsky

Fun fact: The chain of custody on this magic bullet is completely broken and contradictory. There is no clear evidence that the bullet found on the stretcher is the same bullet that found itself in the lab for testing, and that would ultimately be put into evidence.

The commission’s findings and conclusion are completely contingent on this magic bullet and they can’t even get the record straight.

The Warren Report had a report from the FBI saying that the individuals who found the bullet later identified it as the bullet they had seen.

However, the internal record did not show that at all.

The internal records said the opposite! It said “This bullet didn't look like that bullet at all.”

They just straight up lied.

One can only surmise that, somewhere in the FBI, they realized they had to close the loop on Oswald’s guilt, and so they just switched it out. None of the four people, either of the people at Parkland, or the two Secret Service agents who were the supposed chain of custody, could identify the bullet.

Jack Ruby begged to be taken to Washington to tell his story to the Commission. They declined.

After nine months of futile deliberation, the Commission presented their findings to President Johnson. Three days later, they published 26 volumes.

One man on the Commission planned to reveal a dissenting opinion for the presentation at the final Commission meeting, Senator Richard Russell. He just could not bring himself to accept the magic bullet theory or that Oswald was a lone shooter.

In fact, he did not even want to serve on the Commission to begin with. He smelled something fishy right away when he found out they were only going to consider Oswald as a suspect. He described this as an “untenable position”.

Russell was pissed when he found out that there was no transcript of the final meeting in which he had given his dissenting opinion. How convenient.

These ‘findings’ were a joke.

Pictures aren't presented in their entirety. Individuals aren't questioned at length. We were left with a heap of garbage.

What possible evidence could these men have stuffed into 26 volumes?

To illustrate how comically irrelevant these 'findings' were, consider this example classified in the front as 'a study of the teeth of Jack Ruby’s mother.'

Even if Jack Ruby had intended to bite Oswald to death, his mother’s dental records would still be irrelevant.

A piece of testimony that went on for 20 PAGES was from a babysitter for Oswald when he was three years old.

In response to this pile of nonsense, remember Mark Lane? The man who worked on Kennedy’s campaign and interviewed those witnesses? He read the report and, two years later, published a book titled 'Rush to Judgment.'

Like his first article in Dallas, it too was refused publication in America. He had to publish it in Europe. Despite significant backlash from mainstream media, it was a bestseller for two years.

Before Mark, a German journalist named Joachim Joesten wrote a book proving Oswald's innocence. It also had to be published in Europe. It was completely ignored by the American media.

But not by the FBI and the CIA.

Memos prove that both men were under surveillance.

Those two books opened doors for many citizen journalists to conduct their own research and publish books on the subject. I encourage anyone reading this to check them out.

Harold Weisberg wrote a series called 'Whitewash.'

Robert Penn Jones wrote 'Forgive My Grief.'

The only person to sift through and catalog every tidbit of information in the deliberately unreadable 26 volumes, Sylvia Meagher, wrote 'Accessories After the Fact.'

Mae Brussell took to public radio and became the second most listened to voice in America on the assassination, after Mark Lane.

With the proliferation of books and critics, the government and the CIA needed to act. Thus, CIA Memo 1035-960 states, 'The aim is to provide material discrediting the conspiracy theorists... Use of friendly politicians and editors... pointing out communist propagandists... explain ten or more deaths naturally...' “Explain ten or more deaths naturally…” LOL

The CIA began a propaganda campaign, with the help of politicians and media contacts from Mockingbird, to label any opposition 'Conspiracy Theorists.' Did you notice? The CIA actually coined the term 'Conspiracy Theorist' here.

One of the first to adhere to this CIA memo was, of course, their own William F. Buckley. Week by week, he spread his superiors' lies.

Arguably the most significant figure in all this was former FBI officer, Air Force veteran, and politically independent District Attorney, Judge Jim Garrison. Jim initially accepted the Commission's conclusions until a chance meeting with Senator Hale Boggs in Washington. Jim inquired about a potential government cover-up. Boggs’ response, according to Jim, was, 'That's putting it mildly.' Boggs was a dissenting member of the Commission whose dissent was, of course, never published. He later disappeared on a flight over Alaska, never to be found.

After speaking with Boggs, Jim purchased three sets of the 26 volumes. After thoroughly studying them and committing them to memory, Jim decided to conduct his own investigation. Oswald had lived in his jurisdiction, so it made sense. His budget was only $8,000. When a reporter uncovered this expense and published it, the city cut off his funding. But in response, he received more than enough citizen donations to cover it!

One of Jim’s main supporters flew to Miami to be on Larry King’s show to spread the word. They raised $50,000! Unfortunately, Larry King embezzled the money, and Jim never saw a penny.

The only media support Jim received was from two magazines: Playboy and Ramparts magazine. While investigating Oswald’s CIA connections, Jim encountered David Ferrie, a CIA pilot. During the investigation, Ferrie conveniently committed 'suicide,' leaving two typed 'suicide' notes. You can't get a dead man to write a note, now can you?

Wanting to stay ahead this time, Jim swiftly arrested a man named Clay Shaw for having participated in the conspiracy to kill Kennedy, a man that was later proven to have strong CIA connections. His team had good reason to believe Shaw supervised Oswald secretly. It was later revealed that Shaw was, in fact, both a highly valued contract agent and had a security clearance.

In fact, Oswald was an intense person of interest to the CIA for four years before the assassination. He was even added to essentially a no-fly list at the CIA, but on the 8th of October, he was removed from that list at the exact same time as he was removed from the same list at the FBI! If he had been kept on that list he would have not been allowed to be in the area the day of the assassination for security reasons. How convenient!

To millions of Americans craving answers, Jim’s arrest announcement of Clay Shaw was excellent news! But not to the Government and the media! The first to attack was Attorney General Ramsey Clark. He claimed that Shaw had been cleared by the Warren Report. Actually, Shaw was never mentioned in the report. No problem, though. Clark simply had an aide apologize.

Their next tactic was to reveal Shaw's homosexuality. At that time, that could completely discredit a person's character and prevent people from believing anything they said. Jim couldn't allow this and did everything possible to keep that quiet. He needed Shaw to reveal the truth and for people to believe it.

After Shaw's indictment, his lawyer introduced the 26 volumes of the Warren Report to a three-judge panel to prove Shaw's innocence. The judges ruled the 26 volumes INADMISSIBLE. They were not considered an investigation and were only hearsay. Wow. Had the media reported on this legal ruling, the government's report, and possibly the government itself, may have justifiably collapsed. But no. Silence.

The attacks on Jim intensified. He could no longer travel safely. They desperately wanted to suppress any information. A leaked CIA memo revealed that the CIA had to assist Shaw because they believed Jim might secure a conviction. With the public largely ignoring the media fabrications, a bribe followed. They offered Jim a federal judgeship to drop the case. He refused.

Then he discovered infiltrators in his office, one of whom successfully turned over documents to the agency and Shaw's attorneys.

They aimed not just to discredit Jim Garrison, but to destroy him. Aside from many witnesses who saw Oswald with Shaw, Garrison's best witness was a young salesman named Perry Russo. Upon hearing of Shaw's arrest and not wanting to be implicated, Russo stepped forward, swearing under oath that he had been at Ferrie’s house, where Oswald, Shaw, and Ferrie discussed triangulation and shooting President Kennedy.

The media onslaught continued. NBC even offered a job to Perry Russo in California to get him away from the investigation. But, during that meeting, Garrison had Russo wired and recorded everything. Garrison indicted them for tampering and obstruction of justice. Of course, that indictment was dismissed by a federal court and never went to trial.

In response to Jim’s charges against NBC and the FCC, the FCC granted him equal airtime. His appearance was so powerful it forever changed American media. It moved the government to abolish equal time and fair play.

Jim Garrison, by popular demand, was able to secure a spot on Johnny Carson's show, where he proclaimed to America, “There is no question, as a result of our investigation, that an element of the CIA of our country killed John Kennedy, and the present administration is concealing the facts. There is no question about it at all. The executive order, which forbids every person in this audience and every person listening to this program from looking at this evidence until September 2039, was issued by the President of the United States.”

CBS, again, joined the attack. Reporting, along with various news organizations, that there were many serious charges against Jim Garrison and his staff alleging bribery, intimidation, and efforts to plant evidence on Shaw. For two years, the government and their Mockingbirds erected barricades against Garrison and his case.

But finally, he got his day in court. The resistance from the government was total. It was more than just resistance; they outright refused to honor subpoenas. While everyone was focusing on the first charge against Shaw, conspiracy, Garrison maintained that his strongest case was the second charge, perjury. He knew that Shaw would commit perjury because he knew that Shaw would lie about his associations with Oswald and Ferrie.

Shaw’s lawyers thought that their best witness was Dr. Pierre Fink, the only forensic pathologist at Kennedy’s autopsy. He testified that the fatal bullet struck Kennedy from behind, but when cross-examined, he admitted that there was no real autopsy. He said he was not allowed to examine the back wounds, X-rays, photographs, or to perform his duties at all. He recounted how the room was swarming with generals, admirals, and FBI agents. He even recalled a moment when Dr. Humes yelled out, ‘Who’s in charge here!?’ General Curtis LeMay was in charge. And what do you know, he was a known Kennedy hater.

Fink also claimed that his notes disappeared! He was so upset because he had to go home and reconstruct all of his notes from memory. What a mess! All of Dr. Fink’s testimony was, of course, censored by the press.

The photographs of the ‘autopsy’ are a different story. The photos of Kennedy’s head were severely altered to enforce the claim that the bullet came from the back. Not the photos themselves, but in later interviews, the men who were there during the autopsy claimed that the head itself must have been reconstructed before the photos were taken because that is not what they remembered. They remembered his head being essentially blown off with an exit wound in the back.

Something else of note, the official brain autopsy report claims that the weight of the brain was 1,500 grams. This is actually an above average weight for an adult male brain. How could this be? We can see half of his brain fly out of his head on video. Many witnesses say the same as well. Even if it is exaggerated, the official story still claims that a bullet hit head. Some tissue would have fallen out either way. Like I said earlier, Jackie picked up a piece of his brain off the back of the car, it was all over the seats, people were picking it off their clothes. How big was this guy’s brain!?

The photographs of the brain in the National Archives show a fully intact brain that is slightly distorted, and upon investigation, it is clear that these photographs were taken well after Kennedy’s brain was examined. It is not his brain. In fact, JFK’s brain has been missing since 1966. How convenient. Nobody knows where it is. Seriously, it is just straight up missing.

Gerald Ford, in the report, moved the entrance wound on JFK’s back closer to his neck to make the neck exit trajectory work. Everything surrounding the autopsy is an absolute mess. In fact, none of the men who worked on President Kennedy’s poor excuse for an autopsy were asked to testify in front of the Warren Commission. Seriously? A nine month long, 26 volume report didn’t think to include the testimonies of the ones who saw and investigated his body immediately after the attack?

The one physician present at both Parkland Hospital and the Bethesda Morgue, was Kennedy’s personal Doctor, George Berkley. He, of course, didn’t get to give his testimony to the Commission, but he did get interviewed by the JFK Library where he refused to give an opinion about if there was a conspiracy or not.

Then in 1977, through his lawyer, he wrote a letter to Richard Sprague, the HSCA chair, saying he had information indicating that others besides Oswald participated in the assassination and was willing to talk about it now.

But then Sprague was fired just weeks later.

But then in 1982, he told a JFK researcher that he knew there was more than one gunman. But then when he tried to contact Berkley for more details he cut him off at the knees. Why?

Then the next year he talked to another researcher a year later and told him the same thing. That he recalled an exit wound on the back of JFK’s head. The only doctor present during both medical examinations said something completely contrary to the official story.

But then again he cut the researcher off at the knees.

Then he died.

So his daughter was contacted and asked to give a statement about if there were any documents that she could provide that showed what her father wanted to reveal.

She accepted.

But then she completely changed her mind and refused.

What did the CIA have on these people? Holy cow.

*Continued Below*
The press could not contain the firestorm that erupted over the Zapruder film. Garrison had to take Henry Luce of Time Life to the Supreme Court and, surprisingly, obtained the tape. A jury of American citizens would see only what the government had seen and had lied to the world about.

After that, there was a great deal of depression among the news media. Jim Garrison had pierced the bubble that the mainstream news media had been encased in.

But the CIA had one last ace up their sleeve. The CIA planted a witness, Charles Spiesel. He took the stand, claiming he met Shaw and Oswald. He recounted how, when his daughter returned from a trip, he pulled her aside and took her fingerprints to confirm she was real and not a government clone. This discredited Jim Garrison’s case, and the conspiracy charge was dismissed by the jury.

But what about the perjury charge? Well, the local federal court issued an order that they just could not prosecute him. Why? No idea. It was probably illegal.

Of course, in response to all of this, the press headlined for Garrison’s resignation. Having spent so much time and money defending himself against the earlier bribery charges and the income tax evasion he was supposed to have reported on that bribe, both of which he won, he lost his third election for DA to one of Shaw’s lawyers.

He also lost his wife, who divorced him.

What now?

After Garrison’s downfall, there were more sketchy events of note. The Los Angeles Free Press was purchased by Hustler Magazine owner Larry Flynt. The first thing he did was challenge America’s media for not being a free press. He offered a one million dollar reward for anyone who had information on John Kennedy’s assassination.

A few weeks later, he was shot in the back, leaving him paralyzed for life.

This was also around the time when Senator Frank Church’s hearings into the CIA revealed that hundreds of their assets were writing the news during the Vietnam War. The news during that time was, quite literally, government propaganda. And Church proved it.

How many of these wars America has been part of have been fueled by CIA propaganda?

He also discovered that the Pentagon destroyed their entire Kennedy Assassination file. Why? Nobody knows.

Ultimately, the House Select Committee on Assassinations exposed a multitude of inconsistencies with the Warren Commission report that should have been obvious to the Warren Commission at the time. However, it was deemed too damaging for the public to see, and nearly half a million records were to stay sealed until 2029.

In 1975, Geraldo Rivera, on his late-night show on ABC, showed America the Zapruder film for the first time to the public.

Finally, now that the public had seen such damning evidence, hundreds of thousands demanded that Congress conduct a real investigation.

Cornered by these demands, Congress essentially had no choice.

But the CIA is not so easily cornered.

“The House Select Committee on Assassinations” was established within a year. Their purpose was to investigate the murders of John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King.

Unknown today, because it was never reported by the media, the first head of the committee was a lawyer from Philadelphia, Richard Sprague. He not only announced that he would definitively solve the murders, but he also informed his staff that they would not hire any CIA or FBI agents to investigate. That they would be the first to be investigated.

The CIA could not allow this, of course. So, they neutralized him, just as they had done to Jim Garrison. As soon as he issued subpoenas for information from the CIA, the chairman of the committee fired him. He was immediately replaced by Robert Blakey, who then turned the entire proceedings over to the agencies.

Under Blakey, important subpoenaed witnesses never appeared. Sam Giancana was shot in the back of the head days before he was due to testify. John Roselli, a major player in the plot to kill Castro, months later was found dismembered in a barrel in the ocean. George de Mohrenschildt, the CIA’s designated best friend of Oswald’s, was found in his house with his head blown off prior to his interview. A “suicide,” of course.

Blakey was unfazed by all these sudden deaths of key witnesses, as was the press. The most telling incident of this new government deception was an exchange between one of the committee's most respected investigators, Tannenbaum, and David Atlee Phillips, Chief of the CIA’s Western Hemisphere Division. David was identified, under oath, as Maurice Bishop, seen often with Lee Harvey Oswald.

But for some reason, right in the middle of the under-oath subpoenaed interview, Phillips just got up and left. Tannenbaum demanded that the Justice Department arrest him for contempt of Congress, but they refused.

Mark Lane, along with others, still fought to achieve some sort of result from the committee. Interestingly enough, the only results that came at the close of the committee were by accident.

It was discovered that the dictabelt of one of the motorcycle officers in Dallas on the day of the shooting had inadvertently recorded four or more shots. The committee, cornered by this evidence, had no choice but to conclude that there was a conspiracy to commit both murders. Then it was turned over to the Justice Department, where it remains open but is considered a cold case.

Blakey went on to write a book, thanking the CIA and blaming the Mafia.

The conclusions of the committee had so little coverage that most people in the United States are not even aware that, officially, by Congress, it was determined that there was a conspiracy.

So much of the press strongly supported the official government narrative. They were CIA assets now.

Fun fact: The House Select Committee uncovered 78 mysterious deaths related to the case. 78, and the media said nothing.

The brutal eliminations began immediately. Days after Ferrie’s “suicide,” his friend Eladio del Valle had his head split open with an axe. Some murders happened even before Dallas.

In Los Angeles, 23-year-old Karyn Kupcinet called her father, Chicago columnist Irv Kupcinet, screaming, “They are going to murder the president in Dallas!” A week later, she was found strangled.

Rose Cherami was thrown out of a car carrying the gunman to Dallas. Confined to a Louisiana mental hospital, she told the doctors they were going to kill the president. Later, her battered body was found on a Texas highway.

Mary Pinchot Meyer had a long-lasting affair with President Kennedy, which she documented in her diary. She was married to CIA officer Cord Meyer. Former CIA Intelligence Officer E. Howard Hunt, on his deathbed, said Meyer was a major player in the assassination. Her diary disappeared immediately after her unsolved murder in 1964.

Life Magazine's military advisor, Gary Underhill, told friends the CIA killed John Kennedy. In 1964, the gunshot wound to his head was ruled another ‘suicide’. Another ‘suicide’ was William Bruce Pitzer, head of audiovisual at the Bethesda Naval Hospital, who weeks before his retirement showed an aide incomplete autopsy footage showing a gunshot wound to the president's head from the front. Days later, he was found with a gunshot wound to the front of his head.

And many more. Literally there are 78. Look them up. It is insane.

Once in office, another sitting president, Jimmy Carter, said, “Solving President Kennedy’s murder is the only way to get America back in shape.” To do this, he nominated Ted Sorensen as the new CIA Chief. Not wanting someone who might dismantle the agency, they chose someone else.

Later, in LA, two men were arrested for attempting to assassinate Jimmy Carter. Their names were… Raymond Lee Harvey and Oswaldo Espinosa. Carter got the message and said, “I have lost control of the government.”

You know @BillOReilly? For years on Inside Edition, he advocated for challenging the government’s official narrative on the assassination. He pursued it on many different occasions. Then, once he moved to Fox and made his money, he made a 180-degree turn, spreading the discredited Warren Report narrative with his book “Killing Kennedy,” which aligns with the official story. I wonder why?

In 1991, America was stunned when Oliver Stone announced that he was making a film about the JFK assassination based on Jim Garrison’s book. “JFK” hit the screens with such an impact that neither the media nor Congress could ignore it. It was on the front page of every newspaper and magazine, mostly attacks.

In Oct. of 1992, Congress was forced to pass the “JFK Records Act.” They released hundreds of documents, but it was not enough. Quickly, and this is documented, the Secret Service started destroying important records. They were records of trips that President Kennedy had taken in the fall of 1963 prior to him going to Dallas. These records were what are called “threat sheets'' which are records of threats to a president’s life. Seems important, right?

The Secret Service then refused to sign a document under oath stating that they had turned over all documents relating to the assassination.

Still, however, earlier this year the Biden Administration chose to keep the remaining JFK documents related to the assassination under wraps indefinitely, citing national security reasons... again.

What national security secrets could possibly be at risk? What are they hiding?

“In light of the recommendation for continued postponement of public release of information in the records identified in section 2(b) of this memorandum under the statutory standard, I hereby certify, by the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 5(g)(2)(D) of the Act, that continued postponement of public disclosure of that information is necessary to protect against identifiable harms to military defense, intelligence operations, law enforcement, and the conduct of foreign relations that are of such gravity that they outweigh the public interest in disclosure.”

John Kennedy's nephew, @RobertKennedyJr., reacted to the administration's decision:

“The White House announcement is unlawful. In 1992 the JFK Records Act was passed unanimously by Congress with the promise that all assassination-related records would be released no later than October 2017. This promise has been broken once again with this midnight announcement. The assassination was 60 years ago.”

This definitely seems to be an attempt to protect the CIA.

Word, after all this time, is FINALLY getting around that the CIA is bad news, and people are finally waking up. Why? Because the CIA has committed more than just crimes against humanity. We are finding out some really crazy stuff from different sources that the CIA is/was involved in. From drug and child trafficking to non-human intelligence, coverups, even possibly as far as 9/11.

Truman regretted creating it; Eisenhower warned us about it; JFK tried to stop it, and they took him out.

What are they keeping from us? That Oswald worked for the CIA? That the CIA assassinated JFK and scapegoated Oswald? That the actual gunmen were led by George HW Bush? The body double and the real location of JFK's corpse? Maybe we'll never know.

They believe themselves to be the smartest people to ever walk the Earth, but surely they aren't stupid enough not to see that this does nothing but legitimize the ‘conspiracy theorists’, right?

It is clear that the American media will continue to support whatever lie the government continues to regard in favor.

With Bill Clinton’s signing of the 1996 Telecommunications Act, turning our media over to six major corporations, he signed on to be one of the worst Presidents in history.

I could go on and on and on. But this post is long enough. You get the idea.

Now, what is the moral of the story here?

We have seen America become a country where liars run for office and truth-seekers run for their lives.

The continuing lie by the media and the government about the murder of President Kennedy is paradoxically the lie that all of their other foreign policy admitted lies are built upon.

Vietnam with their fake Gulf of Tonkin resolution. No one punished.

Bush and his cronies' lies about “weapons of mass destruction.” No one punished.

Was Jimmy Carter right when he said to get America right we needed to solve the murder of John Kennedy? I sure think so. Do you?

The pursuit of truth is a cornerstone of liberty, and the tale of JFK's assassination is a stark reminder of this. It's a saga that speaks volumes about the relentless struggle between the guardians of secrets and those who advocate for transparency.

This story isn't just about a tragedy from sixty years ago; it's about the integrity of the free press and the government's influence over it.

If the CIA's involvement in manipulating the media through "Operation Mockingbird" holds true, it signifies a profound betrayal of trust and the principles of freedom. The implications of this stretch far beyond a single event, touching on wars waged under false pretenses and a culture of misinformation. Each unverified claim that passes without scrutiny is a blow to democracy, every misuse of power a challenge to the principles of freedom.

The assassination still haunts the nation, underscoring the importance of challenging falsehoods and seeking transparency. In an age where digital shadows loom large, skepticism remains our armor, and the quest for truth, our crusade.

Together, let’s question, seek, and never yield to the forces that would have us do otherwise. Our collective voice is the herald of the future we strive to create—a future where liberty is not just an ideal but a lived reality.

*Inspirations Below*
Check out these wonderful documentaries from which my post was based upon. Absolutely worth watching.

The American Media & The 2nd Assassination Of President John F. Kennedy:

JFK Revisited: Through the Looking Glass: amazon.com/American-Media…
amazon.com/JFK-Revisited-…

Image
Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with FRΞΞ PRINCΞ

FRΞΞ PRINCΞ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tyrannideris

Dec 18
Julian Assange & WikiLeaks revealed the truths governments wanted buried—war crimes, corruption, and the shadow games of power.

For telling you the truth, they hunted, imprisoned, & branded him a criminal.

Here’s what WikiLeaks exposed and why he must be pardoned.

A thread 🧵 Image
In 2010, WikiLeaks released the Collateral Murder video, classified footage that the U.S. military tried to bury. It exposed a chilling war crime committed in Baghdad in 2007:

• A U.S. Apache helicopter gunned down a group of unarmed civilians, including two Reuters journalists.
• A van arrived to rescue the wounded—soldiers opened fire again, killing the driver and injuring two children inside.
• Soldiers laughed as they killed: “Nice,” one says “Keep shooting.”

The Pentagon kept this video hidden for years. Reuters begged for it. Assange published it.

The footage forced the world to see the war’s brutal reality—and for that, they went after him instead of the killers.
The Afghan War Logs were 90,000 classified documents published by WikiLeaks, exposing what officials wouldn’t admit: the war in Afghanistan was a disaster spiraling out of control.

• Hundreds of unreported civilian deaths from drone strikes and bombings.
• Special forces operations targeting the wrong people, leading to the deaths of innocent families.
• Intelligence reports showing the Taliban’s strength growing while the U.S. claimed "progress."

Behind podiums, officials fed the public reassuring lies. On the ground, the documents told a story of chaos, carnage, and hopelessness.

Assange showed the truth: the war wasn’t being won. It was being lost—and they knew it.Image
Read 17 tweets
Dec 17
Edward Snowden risked everything in 2013 to show the world what the NSA was doing behind closed doors.

People have forgotten too quickly.

Here’s what he revealed, why it matters, and why Snowden should be venerated—not vilified.

A thread 🧵 Image
PRISM was the crown jewel of NSA surveillance. It gave them direct access to data from the biggest tech companies—Google, Facebook, Apple, Microsoft, and more.

• Emails, chats, video calls, photos, files.
• Anything stored in the cloud.

Tech companies denied their involvement, but Snowden proved they were compliant. If you used these platforms, the NSA had a backdoor to your life.

PRISM didn’t just target “bad guys”—it swept up everyone, under the guise of national security. Your private conversations, your memories, your family photos—none of it was truly private.Image
Snowden called XKeyscore “the closest thing to ‘collect it all’ ever conceived.”

It wasn’t some targeted surveillance program—it was total surveillance.

• NSA analysts could pull your browsing history, emails, chats, and even your search engine queries.
• All they needed was an IP address or email, and boom—your digital life was theirs. No warrants. No oversight.

To give you an idea of scope: one NSA training document said XKeyscore could track “nearly everything a user does on the internet.”

Snowden’s leak revealed that any low-level analyst could use XKeyscore to spy on anyone.Image
Read 13 tweets
Nov 7
If you're still clinging to the idea that voting is the only solution, it's time to wake up.

True resistance doesn't come from filling in a bubble on a ballot—it comes from taking necessary radical action outside the system.

Below are some effective ways to resist: THREAD 🧵
To begin, we have to ask ourselves: Why is voting the only form of resistance that’s universally accepted? Why are we so quick to believe that this single, predictable action—within a system as broken as ours—will yield the kind of change that history has proven only comes through much more radical means?

Think about it—the only form of resistance allowed by those in power is the one that doesn’t threaten them.

But deep down, we know that real change has never come from a ballot box alone. The Declaration of Independence, a document we celebrate every year, is crystal clear on this point: "That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government."

Those words weren’t written lightly. They were born out of the recognition that entrenched power never relinquishes control voluntarily. Sometimes, it has to be taken.

Below is a real guide to resistance—true solutions beyond the tired act of voting.
1. Opt Out of the Financial System

• Cryptocurrency: Use decentralized currencies like Bitcoin or Monero to operate outside the traditional banking system. These currencies cut out the middleman and prevent government oversight of your transactions. They’re harder to track, tax, or confiscate, giving you financial sovereignty in a world where cash is becoming obsolete. (Don’t forget to practice self custody!)

• Bartering: Trade goods and services with others without involving currency. Bartering avoids taxes and regulations, creating a localized, decentralized economy. Establish barter networks with like-minded individuals to further reduce reliance on government-controlled markets.

• Precious Metals: Gold, silver, and other physical assets are immune to inflation and central bank policies. By holding and trading precious metals, you escape the volatility of fiat currency while storing wealth in a form that’s immune to government manipulation.

• Create Local Economies: Build and support local economies through farmers' markets, local co-ops, and community-based trade networks. Keeping money within your community reduces reliance on global corporate structures, enabling more control over your financial transactions and supply chains.
Read 17 tweets
Sep 10
If you're still clinging to the idea that voting is your only weapon, it's time to wake up.

True resistance doesn't come from filling in a bubble on a ballot—it comes from taking necessary radical action outside the system.

Below are a some effective ways to resist: THREAD 🧵
1. Opt Out of the Financial System

• Cryptocurrency: Use decentralized currencies like Bitcoin or Monero to operate outside the traditional banking system. These currencies cut out the middleman and prevent government oversight of your transactions. There are harder to track, tax, or confiscate, giving you financial sovereignty in a world where cash is becoming obsolete.

• Bartering: Trade goods and services with others without involving currency. Bartering avoids taxes and regulations, creating a localized, decentralized economy. Establish barter networks with like-minded individuals to further reduce reliance on government-controlled markets.

• Precious Metals: Gold, silver, and other physical assets are immune to inflation and central bank policies. By holding and trading precious metals, you escape the volatility of fiat currency while storing wealth in a form that is immune to government manipulation.

• Create Local Economies: Build and support local economies through farmers' markets, local co-ops, and community-based trade networks. Keeping money within your community reduces reliance on global corporate structures, enabling more control over your financial transactions and supply chains.
2. Withdraw Your Data

• Ditch Big Tech: Stop handing over your personal data to tech giants like Google, Facebook, and Amazon, who often collaborate with governments. Instead, use privacy-focused alternatives like Brave (search), Signal (messaging), ProtonMail (email), and privacy Linux distros (operating system). These platforms prioritize your data privacy and limit corporate or government tracking.

• Go Off the Grid Digitally: Minimize your digital footprint by using VPNs, encryption tools like PGP, and decentralized platforms like Mastodon. Stay anonymous online, disable tracking features on your devices, and reject "smart" devices that collect data about your habits.

• Cybersecurity Mastery: Protect your digital life by mastering cybersecurity techniques. Learn how to use TOR for anonymous browsing, TAILS as an operating system that leaves no trace, and tools like VeraCrypt for encrypted data storage. Owning your data and privacy means outsmarting both corporate and state surveillance.

• Data Ownership: Take control of your personal information by switching to open-source software and decentralized storage solutions. Consider running your own servers for things like email or data backups, so you're not dependent on cloud services that are easily monitored or controlled by corporations or governments.
Read 14 tweets
Jun 5
In the dark corridors of the 1940s, as WWII raged, American intelligence officers forged a grotesque alliance with organized crime and warlords, creating a monstrous narcotics-fueled empire.

At the helm of this unholy network? The CIA.

Let's unpack some of their worst crimes:🧵 Image
Operation Phoenix (1965-1972):

Imagine a war within a war, where the enemy isn’t always in uniform, and death comes swiftly and silently. During the Vietnam War, the CIA unleashed Operation Phoenix, a brutal campaign aimed at annihilating the Viet Cong's infrastructure.

The premise was simple: identify, capture, and eliminate Viet Cong operatives and their sympathizers. But the execution was far from straightforward. Instead of clear targets, the CIA cast a wide net, often snaring innocent civilians in their grasp. The methods employed were nothing short of barbaric. Interrogations frequently involved waterboarding, electric shocks, beatings, and psychological torture, leaving victims physically and mentally shattered.

The numbers alone are staggering. Tens of thousands were detained, many without trial. By the end of the program, an estimated 20,000 Vietnamese had been assassinated. But these were not clean, surgical strikes; they were brutal, bloody killings often carried out in front of families and communities, designed to instill fear and submission.

Operation Phoenix didn't just target enemy combatants; it devastated villages, tore apart families, and sowed distrust among the Vietnamese people. It was a campaign of terror, where the line between combatant and civilian was deliberately blurred, and human life was expendable.Image
MK-Ultra (1953-1973):

Picture a world where your mind is not your own, where your thoughts and actions are manipulated by unseen forces. This was the dark reality of MK-Ultra, a covert CIA program that delved into the depths of human depravity, all in the name of mind control. From 1953 to 1973, the CIA conducted a series of horrifying experiments on unwitting subjects, leaving a legacy of trauma and madness.

The goal was sinister: to develop techniques for controlling and manipulating human behavior. The methods? Purely monstrous. The CIA used drugs like LSD, hypnosis, sensory deprivation, and psychological torture, experimenting on individuals without their knowledge or consent. Hospitals, universities, and even prisons became covert laboratories where these inhumane trials took place.

Victims of MK-Ultra were often left mentally and physically broken. The program pushed the boundaries of ethical science, transforming human beings into mere lab rats in a macabre quest for control. Some participants experienced severe psychological trauma, leading to lifelong mental health issues. Others were driven to insanity or even suicide.

The most notorious figure associated with MK-Ultra was Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, the CIA's chief chemist, who earned the grim nickname "Black Sorcerer." Under his direction, the program expanded its reach, experimenting with ever more extreme and sadistic methods. Innocent people were subjected to unimaginable horrors, all under the guise of national security.Image
Read 12 tweets
Jan 13, 2023
People out here celebrating news that the COVID vaccines may be harmful like that isn't fucking horrible.

BILLIONS of people got a shot, you know that right?
Just so we're clear, you do understand that not all vaccinated people wanted you tyrannized for not getting the shot, right?

The VAST majority of vaccinated people just kept to themselves. Maybe they got the jab so they could see their family, OR NOT LOSE THEIR JOB.
Just because you're "unvaxed" doesn't mean that all vaxed people are your enemy, and vice versa.

The tyrants and their supporters are.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(