Holy shit… I just found out why OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google engineers never worry about prompts.
They use context stacks. Context engineering is the real meta.
It’s what separates AI users from AI builders.
Here's how to write prompts to get best results from LLMs:
Prompt engineering was a hack for the early days of AI like learning to talk to a foreigner using short phrases and keywords.
But today’s models don’t just understand instructions. They understand environments.
Your job isn’t to “prompt” the model.
It’s to architect its context.
Think of context as a digital environment you build around the model before it ever starts generating.
You define:
• Who it should “be” (role/persona)
• What it’s trying to achieve (goals)
• How it should communicate (tone/style)
• What to reference (examples, data, past work)
This is what drives consistent, on-brand, high-quality output.
Gemini 3.0 Pro just killed consulting as we know it.
Here are the 3 prompts I use to get McKinsey-grade answers instantly 👇
Let me tell you what McKinsey consultants actually do:
1. Analyze industry trends and competitive dynamics 2. Benchmark companies and products 3. Identify strategic risks and opportunities 4. Package it all in fancy slides and charge 6 figures
But guess what?
AI can now do 90% of that instantly.
Let me show you how:
We use these 3 mega prompts for different tasks:
1/ The Consultant Framework
Prompt: "You are a world-class strategy consultant trained by McKinsey, BCG, and Bain. Act as if you were hired to provide a $300,000 strategic analysis for a client in the [INDUSTRY] sector.
Here is your mission:
1. Analyze the current state of the [INDUSTRY] market. 2. Identify key trends, emerging threats, and disruptive innovations. 3. Map out the top 3-5 competitors and benchmark their business models, strengths, weaknesses, pricing, distribution, and brand positioning. 4. Use frameworks like SWOT, Porter’s Five Forces, and strategic value chain analysis to assess risks and opportunities. 5. Provide a one-page strategic brief with actionable insights and recommendations for a hypothetical company entering or growing in this space.
Output everything in concise bullet points or tables. Make it structured and ready to paste into slides. Think like a McKinsey partner preparing for a C-suite meeting.
🚨 This project just made most AI agents look outdated.
It’s called Better Agents and it supercharges your coding assistant (Kilocode, Claude Code, Cursor, etc), making it an expert in any agent framework you choose (Agno, Mastra, etc) and all their best practices.
This is the future of autonomous AI.
Here’s how it works 👇
Every AI agent demo looks amazing until production hits.
Then reality:
— Agents hallucinate in edge cases
— No version control for prompts
— Zero test coverage
— Debugging = prayer
Better Agents isn't another framework. It's the testing layer everyone forgot to build.
This open-source project just solved the biggest problem with AI agents that nobody talks about. It's called Acontext and it makes your agents actually LEARN from their mistakes.
While everyone's building dumb agents that repeat the same errors 1000x, this changes everything.
Here's how it works (in plain English):↓
Acontext built a complete learning system for agents:
— Store: Persistent context & artifacts
— Observe: Track tasks and user feedback
— Learn: Extract SOPs into long-term memory
When your agent completes a complex task, Acontext:
→ Extracts the exact steps taken
→ Identifies tool-calling patterns
→ Creates reusable "skill blocks"
→ Stores them in a Notion-like Space