The FBI says it doesn’t retaliate against whistleblowers, and treats all its employees the same. But former agents said last spring they were punished for reporting abuses. And now, more have come forward to say that FBI is firing conservatives, Christians, and Covid skeptics.
FBI Is Purging Christians, Conservatives, And Covid Skeptics,
New Whistleblowers Allege
New disclosures show massive politicization of federal law enforcement
By @galexybrane
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) revoked whistleblowers’ security clearances due to legitimate security concerns, reported the New York Times and the Washington Post last spring. The FBI agents who testified about FBI abuse of power before the House Judiciary Committee in May, the New York Times claimed, “do not meet the definition of whistleblowers.”
The FBI penalized those agents, agreed Democrats, for valid reasons, including their support for January 6 rioters, and they used the House hearing to pursue a politically motivated “vendetta against the FBI.” They “are not, in fact whistleblowers,” Democrats said.
But now yet more FBI employees have come forward to make protected whistleblower disclosures to the House Judiciary Committee. The new disclosures, which Public obtained copies of, suggest that the FBI’s Security Division has knowingly retaliated against at least one whistleblower and is improperly using security clearance investigations to single out others.
The FBI denies any wrongdoing. In a statement to Public, the FBI said, “While we have no comment on specific employees, the FBI has not and will not retaliate against individuals who make protected whistleblower disclosures…. The FBI will look into any allegations that employees have broken laws or violated FBI policies and take action if appropriate. We hold all employees to the highest standards of conduct.”
The whistleblower disclosures, however, suggest that the FBI does not always “hold all employees to the highest standards of conduct.” On multiple occasions, say whistleblowers, the Security Division allowed employees to keep their security clearances after being involved in domestic violence incidents. In one case described in the whistleblower disclosures, a special agent was permitted to keep his security clearance and firearm after being arrested for allegedly trying to strangle a female partner.
In contrast, whistleblowers say, the Security Division has used exaggerated allegations of minor misconduct to suspend and revoke security clearances of conservatives, veterans, whistleblowers, and unvaccinated employees. In doing so, they allege, the FBI has violated security clearance guidelines laid out by the Office of the Director of National Security… (continued below)
@galexybrane Please subscribe now to hold FBI accountable and to read the rest of the story!
On Sept 27 @nytimes accused @elonmusk of being “misleading” for criticizing a new California law to censor parody. “The laws have exceptions for parody” said the Times
Five days later a judge ruled the law unconstitutional. Why? Because it banned a video clearly labeled “PARODY”
On Oct 5, three days after the judge’s ruling, @nytimes published the false Sept 27 accusation in its *print* edition.
The @nytimes has still not corrected its *misinformation* or, assuming it knew on Oct 5 that the accusation was wrong, *disinformation.*
@nytimes Who is the @nytimes reporter who spread the mis- and disinformation? Why he’s the reporter who covers misinformation! Because of course he is.
Bill Gates two weeks ago, John Kerry last week, and Hillary Clinton today — all demanding government censorship of X. Hard to see this as a coincidence. They appear to be laying the groundwork for totalitarianism. Our democratic republic is in danger.
California's recent ban on election-related "misinformation," including political parody, is unconstitutional, a federal court has just ruled. Free speech, not censorship, is the solution to bad info. Wonderful repudiation of totalitarians @GavinNewsom @KamalaHarris & @Tim_Walz
Judge John A. Mendez of the United States District Court of California directly addresses the "Kamala Harris Campaign Ad PARODY, shared by @elonmusk , that led @GavinNewsom & California legislature to enact the unconstitutional censorship legislation.
Judge Mendez has granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, which prevents the California law from going into effect. The reason says Mendez is because "Kohls is likely to succeed in showing" that the California law is unconstitutional.
Tim Walz just spread misinformation in service of making the case for government censorship. He said it’s illegal to yell fire in a crowded theater. That’s a myth. The expression refers to a *nonbinding* claim in a 1919 Supreme Court opinion that was *overturned* in 1969.
Tim Walz had previously claimed that it was illegal to spread misinformation about elections. It’s not. How could it be? If you let the government to censor disfavored views on elections, how would we ever know if the government stole an election?
Walz, Harris, Bill Gates, John Kerry and the media are all effectively demanding that the government re-start an illegal censorship and election interference operation run by a “former” CIA operative.
It may seem like what's happening in Brazil has nothing to do with us, but it does. Brazil is a test case for the kind of censorship Kamala Harris wants to impose in the U.S. How do we know? Because we've caught her and Biden funding it.
Over the last two years, my colleagues and I have documented multiple illegal operations by United States government agencies, including the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
We documented how the CIA, its allies, and intermediaries created the Russia collusion hoax, ran tightly organized efforts to take control of censorship and content moderation at Twitter and other social media platforms, and interfered in the 2020 election by approving the publication of a letter from 51 former CIA and other Intelligence Community officials, which falsely claimed there was evidence that the Hunter Biden laptop story was Russian disinformation.
We reported on the FBI’s persecution of employee whistleblowers, its inadequate investigation of an alleged pipe bomb on January 6, and its illegal interference in the 2020 elections by spreading disinformation about and encouraging censorship of the Hunter Biden laptop story.
Finally, we have documented how DHS, which Congress created after 9/11 to combat terrorism, ran multiple operations to spread disinformation, demand censorship, and interfere in elections. These efforts involved current or former members of the US Department of Defense, the British Ministry of Defense, and the CIA. We reported that DHS also created so-called “public-private partnerships” with censorship groups like the Stanford Internet Observatory.
Now, my colleagues and I have discovered that US government agencies, including the FBI and known intermediaries with the CIA, have been funding pro-censorship advocacy and advising the Brazilian government on how to engage in censorship.
This matters to me personally because the Brazilian government is currently persecuting me for exposing its illegal censorship and for denouncing its transformation into a dictatorship. The Federal Police wrote two reports about my alleged crime of publishing the Twitter Files - Brazil, which exposed illegal government censorship. President Lula’s Administration followed this up with a report by the Attorney General, recommending my prosecution.
But it should matter to all Americans because it is a gross abuse of power by the Kamala Harris-Joe Biden administration and further proof that the so-called Deep State agencies of the US government are pushing for illegal censorship and other totalitarian attacks on core American freedoms.
The good news is that many people are waking up. A few weeks ago, hundreds of thousands of people protested in Brazil in one of the largest free-speech gatherings in history.
And now, members of Congress are demanding an end to funding for censorship in Brazil. “The Biden-Harris Administration has weaponized U.S. foreign assistance programs and other means to promote censorship in Brazil and crack down on free speech that would be protected under our U.S. Constitution here at home,” said Rep. Chris Smith today. Smith is a senior member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, who chaired a congressional hearing to examine Brazil’s incipient totalitarianism last May.
Rep. @Jim_Jordan and @RepMariaSalazar co-sponsored the "No Funding or Enforcement of Censorship Abroad Act" (HR 9850). The Act would:
1. Prohibit foreign assistance to entities that promote censorship of speech that would be protected speech in the United States;
2. Prohibit foreign assistance to entities that back the Brazilian government’s censorship directives to U.S. internet companies;
3. Prohibit U.S. law enforcement cooperation with foreign countries to “cause, facilitate, or promote online censorship” of political speech; and
4. Prohibit U.S. law enforcement cooperation with Brazilian government censorship directives against internet companies headquartered in the United States.
“The House Judiciary Committee and the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government have uncovered how the FBI under the Biden-Harris Administration facilitated a foreign government’s censorship requests against Americans,” said Rep. Jordan. “This bill is critical in stopping foreign government censors from using the DOJ or the FBI to silence disfavored views.”
“The United States needs to uphold the principles of its constitution and stand by its citizens whenever they face censorship abroad,” said Rep. Salazar....
Please subscribe now to support our defense of free speech, read the rest of the article, and watch the rest of the video!
I am grateful to Rep. Chris Smith, Rep. @Jim_Jordan and @RepMariaSalazar for this legislation in general, and for mentioning my persecution by the Brazilian government specifically.🙏❤️✊
Ireland's government has abandoned its proposed hate speech law, which would have allowed the police to enter homes and search phones and computers for wrongthink
This is wonderful news that gives us momentum to beat back totalitarianism worldwide!
Big congratulations to @FreeSpeechIre and @griptmedia, which did so much to raise global awareness of this awful, totalitarian proposal