Sheldon Whitehouse Profile picture
Nov 16 6 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Let’s take a look at some of the tweaks the Supreme Court made to the lower courts’ code of conduct. Swapping out “judge” for “justice” makes perfect sense, but a few of these edits ought to raise eyebrows.

Here’s the “no ratting out your colleagues” switch: Image
Note here the addition of “knowingly.” Image
Deleted: “that a judge’s conduct contravened this Code, that a judicial employee’s conduct contravened this Code, that a judicial employee’s conduct contravened the Code of Conduct for Judicial Employees, or that a lawyer violated applicable rules of professional conduct.” Image
"Shall" is swapped for "should." Image
"Shall" swapped for “should,” and “knowingly” sprinkled in a few more times. Image
And one more excerpt.

Setting aside the main problem of no process/no umpires, even the Code itself is watered down for Their Olympian Highnesses. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sheldon Whitehouse

Sheldon Whitehouse Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SenWhitehouse

Nov 13
The question is enforcement: where do you file a complaint; who reviews it; how does fact finding occur; who compares what happened to what’s allowed? 

That’s where the rubber hits the road. 🧵 Image
For instance, justices are supposed to recuse from cases where they have a personal interest, but Thomas has never been asked about his wife’s 1/6 role or what he knew.
For instance, justices are supposed to report gifts and income, but Thomas has never been asked about the RV loan on which he reportedly paid only interest not principal.
Read 7 tweets
Nov 9
“As Mr. Trump criticized the court, Mr. Leo with the Federalist Society is said to have told associates he was disappointed that the former president’s rhetoric made his judicial appointment record look ‘transactional,’ aimed at advancing Mr. Trump’s personal interests….”
Let’s consider “transactional”: Kochs hated Trump, Trump hated Kochs; then came Trump’s public “Federalist Society list” for the Supreme Court; then came peace between House of Koch and House of Trump. Is that a transaction?  
nytimes.com/2023/11/01/us/…
As to the first: the Kochs pledged to spend millions against Trump; Trump mocked them and called out Republican primary opponents who traveled to fancy Koch political event to kiss their ring.
Read 5 tweets
Oct 23
The number one goal of the right-wing fossil-fuel billionaires who captured the Court is to break the public’s power to regulate things like pollution.

newyorker.com/news/daily-com…
The Court has obediently followed their lead, importing ideas cooked up in billionaire-funded doctrine factories into U.S. law.

They get their directions from flotillas of billionaire-funded right-wing “amici” who file coordinated briefs at the Court.
Often, to get where they want, the billionaires’ chosen justices make up facts — watch for false fact-finding in this case.
Read 4 tweets
Sep 25
Here’s the right-wing billionaire “care-and-feeding-of-FedSoc-justices” count so far:
1. Harlan Crow to Clarence Thomas: “Undisclosed yacht and jet travel 1.0” in 2011 followed by “undisclosed yacht and jet travel 2.0” earlier this year; multiple vacations and gifts to Thomas family.
2.  Paul Singer to Sam Alito: Undisclosed jet travel and Alaskan fishing vacation. Accompanied by Leonard Leo. Singer has had company cases before the Court and contributes to these groups that try to influence the Court: Manhattan Institute and Federalist Society.
Read 10 tweets
Sep 25
The U.S. is far behind the E.U. on reducing plastics contamination because U.S. fossil fuel interests hold such sway with the Republican Party, so fossil fuel (including plastics) interests can come arrogantly to U.S. politics like they own the place — because they do. It’s sad.
In the E.U., corporate power is more diffuse, so corruption is less, and corporations have to behave more like citizens, less like bosses.
Read 6 tweets
Sep 22
Oh, my.

More undisclosed private jet travel, more fingerprints of the billionaire-funded Court fixer Leonard Leo, more engagement with billionaire-funded organizations scheming to influence the Court.

propublica.org/article/claren…
Always the same little circle; always the Chosen Ones on the Court.
The case mentioned, Bonta, was an insidious one. The state-of-the-art tool of modern secret political influence is twinned 501c3 and 501c4 organizations. This case made donations secret to the 501c3 twin, even from state regulators. It was 6-3 with all the Chosen Ones signing up.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(