Trail Sinister. Big Lies (17 Nov 1918): Revolutionsfeier
The German Revolution arrived in Munich exactly one year after the October Revolution / Bolshevik Coup in St. Petersburg. There it was led by Kurt Eisner, a 51-year-old bohemian intellectual dilettante, drama critic and communist who spent his time in the artists’ cafés around the University of Munich in Schwabing. 🧵
For the the uprising and establishment of the Bavarian Soviet Republic, see my previous thread here:
Again, those councils were what the Russians called soviets and German communists created them in November 1918 in conscious imitation of the Russian example. Indeed, Räte is the German word for council and soviet.
And Kurt Eisner was a communist. Most historians will tell you he was an Independent Socialist (USPD), which he was, but he and most of the USPD were communists. In Eisner’s case he was more of an anarcho-communist than a Leninist or Stalinist.
And he was a Jew. And he had been involved in a workers’ strike in January 1918.
This is important to note because Hitler would arrive in Munich in four days (21 Nov 1918) and Bavaria’s Räterepublik obviously influenced Hitler’s later Weltanschauung (Worldview).
The fact that it was led by serval Jewish Marxists obviously led Hitler to associate Jews with Marxism so that he often conflated the two and referred to Jewish-Marxism.
At which point I’ll link to a slide from my Red Rising in Munich thread:
Like I keep saying, there’s always a grain of truth to totalitarian Big Lies like the infamous Dolchstoßlegende, or myth of the stab-in-the-back. Hardly anyone would buy into them if there wasn’t any truth to them at all.
But also note how Kershaw says “Nazi caricature.” It must be said that the Nazis hardly caricatured the Bavarian Soviet Republic. Eisner and his comrades caricatured themselves.
And we get a glimpse of what this experiment in communism in Bavaria was like in its early days by looking at the Revolutionsfeier (Revolutionary Celebration) on 17 November 1918.
Volker Weidermann’s new Dreamers: When the Writers Took Power is a very literary account of these events that often provides colorful details you won’t find in other histories:
P. 63-7
“The 17th of November is the best, most splendid day of his [Eisner’s] brief reign. The new government has invited the people to a celebration of the revolution in the National Theater.”
It’s a very posh area in the center of Munich.
“The tickets have been allocated by ballot,” continues Weidermann.
You’re looking at one of them.
Weidermann continues:
“The new ministers are distributed all around the auditorium — there is no VIP area. There are no military insignia to be seen, either. Just red sashes, red ribbons, red armbands.
“The famous villa architect Emanuel von Seidl has decorated the opera house for the occasion. The theatrical city of Munich celebrates itself and its new Prime Minister.
“He has chosen Beethoven for the musical program.
"The Leonore overtures.
"The conductor is Bruno Walter, of course, Thomas Mann’s best friend, who very recently trembled in fear of losing his money and his life. It is a perfect concert.
“Afterwards the curtains part and Eisner appears, with his little spectacles, unkempt beard and high forehead. There is a thunderous swell of applause. The curtains close behind him. He pauses, he looks, he begins:
That’s how communists think. It’s what they call praxis.
“Kurt Eisner gets carried away and takes the whole auditorium with him,” continues Weidermann.
“That evening in the National Theater he lays out his dream, the utopia he wants to transform into reality — indeed, he thinks reality has already been transformed.
“He sees, and he wants everyone else to see, that overnight reality has miraculously taken on the character of his wildest dreams.”
He went on to speak about what he meant by democracy:
As Weidermann points out:
“That was what the councils [i.e. soviets] were for.”
Indeed, this is what communists refer to as “true democracy” -- based on soviets. And remember there were only workers’ and soldiers’ and peasant soviets, not bourgeois small business owner soviets etc.
So obviously that’s not democracy but the dictatorship of certain minority groups.
Large continues:
“When Eisner finished, a group of actors played a scene from Goethe’s Epimenedes Erwachen, ending with the call ‘Upward, Onward, Upward! And the work, will be done!’
“Next, some singers performed the section in Handel’s Messiah in which the chorus intones: ‘The people who wander in the darkness see a great light.’
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
On 19 November 2015, a little over two years after the founding of BLM, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee quietly warned their congressional leaders that BLM was, as we all now know, “radical.” 🧵
But they didn’t want to lose their support either, of course. So at that time they advised them to listen to such views rather than condemn them, and to not offer support for concrete policy positions.
Stalin’s Apologists (16 Nov 1933): News Fit To Print
You’re looking at an article from the New York Times’s Moscow correspondent Walter Duranty published the day before FDR announced he was officially recognizing the Soviet régime. Mind you this was in the middle of the first great Communist genocide that we now call the Holodomor as Duranty and Roosevelt well knew. 🧵
News of the Soviet genocide broke in the spring of 1933.
Trump was literally right. It's the science folks, as the Marxist Left is so fond of saying, especially when they’re flouting the science and calling it racist. But science isn’t racism and Marxist Globalism isn’t science. 🧵
When I say that’s the science, I’m not joking. You literally don’t have a country if you don’t have a border.
Our international order has been based on Sovereign Territorial States since the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648 that ended the incredibly destructive Thirty Years War fought both between and within countries divided by ethnicity and religion.
Trail Sinister. Big Lies (2 Nov 1918): Mutiny & Revolution
Marxists downplay or entirely deny the threat of communism in Germany in 1918-1919 because they don’t want you to know that fascism was a reaction to communism, not to mention derived from it. They want you to think the Right started it then and are therefore starting it now. Whereas the Left started it then, just as they’ve started it now. 🧵
Orwell put it well in 1949:
To which we can now add Marxists control the present and therefore the past, which in turn allows them to control the present and future.
On 10 September 1917 Kerensky publicly charged General Kornilov of plotting to make himself dictator and proclaimed himself dictator in order to "save the revolution from the Right." Kerensky, the so-called moderate socialist, chose the radical Left over the moderate Right and two months later Lenin overthrew Kerensky in order to "save the revolution from the Right" and made himself dictator. 🧵
The Kornilov Affair, as we now call it, is one of the Russian Revolution’s great mysteries. We will never know the details, although it’s safe to say the truth, broadly speaking, was closer to the opposite of what Kerensky claimed.
There's a possibility Kerensky plotted to make himself dictator from the start of the Kornilov Affair, in which case it would be more accurate to call it the Kerensky Affair. As Richard Pipes wrote:
P: 772 (Kindle). Can’t access it on the Internet Archive right now to confirm hard copy page but here’s the link:
Trail Sinister. Big Lies (8 Aug 1918): The Black Day of the German Army.
A dense, impenetrable fog blanketed the ground around Amiens in the early morning hours of 8 August 1918. Precisely at 0420 a flare fizzed into the sky. 🧵 https://t.co/jPfEvZFuSWtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
The war correspondent J. F. B. Livesay described how it began: