Christopher David Profile picture
Nov 18 18 tweets 4 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
SpaceX is scheduled to attempt another Starship launch again tomorrow morning (Saturday) at 8am EDT from their facility in Boca Chica, Texas.

Here are my thoughts and predictions.

A thread 🧵
The first launch attempt occured on 4/20 of this year, and resulted in massive damage to their launchpad, as well as the ultimate destruction of the rocket itself.

Here's my thread about it.
For tomorrow, much has changed from the first attempt.

For one, a steel plate with a water deluge system has been installed underneath the pad, and the entire mission profile of the rocket flight has been adjusted to increase the likelihood of success.

So will it work?
Let's talk about the launchpad first.

The core of the SpaceX launchpad design is reusability.

Since a SINGLE trip to the moon for Starship will ultimately require up to 20 launches from Boca Chica to make happen, this is critical. Image
And they have to make those repeated launches on a quick turnaround timeframe from that single pad in order to make this work.

They have no other choice.

Otherwise it won't be possible, by the plan they've laid out themselves.
After the first launch, the pad took months to repair and modify.

By SpaceX's own requirements, this is not acceptable since they will need to make 16 - 20 consecutive launches, every 12 days, to support a single moon mission.

So will the water cooled steel plate work?
Probably not and tomorrow's launch will definitely demonstrate that.

Even if it survives without completely being destroyed, it will be damaged.

Probably heavily.

And it will definitely not be fixable enough to support another launch 12 days later.
But even then, the steel plate won't truly be tested under a moon mission launch scenario tomorrow.

Why?

Because tomorrow's launch has been designed for optics only.

The flight profile of the rocket has completely changed from the first time it was launched in April.
First off, the flight tomorrow is suborbital and there will be no payload aboard.

That means the entire rocket will be much lighter than it would be for a moon mission launch.

It also means the rocket can use much less thrust to take off from the pad.
This means that tomorrow the water cooled steel plate will face much less stress than it would in a normal moon launch.

Now, let's talk about the flight profile itself for the rocket.

The biggest change that's been made from the 1st launch is how long that booster will fire.
As we saw in the first launch, progressively more and more engines of the 33 started to fail the longer the booster was running.

It fired for approximately 4 minutes in the first launch in April

Tomorrow is supposed to fire for only ~2.5 minutes.

Big change.
Why did they do this?

Well, as we saw in April the longer the booster was running, the worse the situation became with engines failing.

So how will they compensate?

By relying on a longer burn from the six engines in Starship itself to make the suborbital flight possible.
The booster will hold much less propellant this time, and Starship will hold much more.

So none of what happens tomorrow is going to demonstrate anything that's useful to meet their goal of going to the moon.

It's just for show.

It's to make Elon happy.
In fact, this launch tomorrow is no different than the single flight of the Spruce Goose by Howard Hughes back in 1947.

Hughes had promised to make the plane fly or he'd leave the country.

And he made it fly.

For three minutes.

It never flew again. Image
And this doesn't even address the idea that there's a better than 50/50 chance the Starship will blow up again.

The Starship booster is immensely complex, specifically because it has 33 rocket engines on it.

That's a lot of additional complexity.
With many additional points of potential critical failure, the chances of reliable success goes down.

So do I think it will blow up tomorrow?

Probably.

But that's not what's really important here.

Everything is being done to make this flight look like a success to the world.
And none of it is reflective of how this hardware will actually be used to meet its mission requirements.

It's being done this way for only one reason.

To salvage this dude's image. Image
So watch tomorrow with that type of eye, and don't listen to how SpaceX, the MSM, or Elon himself tries to spin it.

Now go enjoy the show.

End of thread. 🧵

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Christopher David

Christopher David Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Tazerface16

Nov 19
SpaceX attempted to launch another Starship on a suborbital flight yesterday, and like the first one seven months earlier, it blew up again.

This would be a good time to talk about using rapid iterative development in the aerospace industry.

A thread. 🧵 Image
The idea of rapidly developing prototypes, testing them to failure, and then developing a new one based on what was learned is not a new one.

Each time you iterate, things improve.

It's used in many industries and it's a very effective way of getting new products to market.
But should this be used in the aerospace industry?

Maybe.

It might be appropriate in some areas, especially at the very beginning of development.

But it's also a very risky strategy when we're talking about doing it with something as colossal as Starship and its heavy booster.
Read 16 tweets
May 31
Anybody want to talk about this movie? Image
Starring a young and perky pre "Sex and the City" Kim Cattrall. Image
As well as Kurt Russell sporting a colorful wife-beater and wearing a vibrant shade of red lipstick. Image
Read 7 tweets
May 31
My parents are both in the 80s, and I am only now just realizing this morning how they are being regularly victimized by low-level scams targeted at older folks.

There are entire industries solely designed to target seniors and extract small/medium amounts of money from them...
...in seemingly legitimate ways.

They go right up to the line of legality and often cross it quite frequently.

In the last year, my folks have been scammed by software providers, attorneys, garage door repair people, etc.

It's fucking endless.

They're slowly being...
...drained in little ways, as if they're engulfed in a giant cloud of mosquitoes.

I blame myself for not paying close enough attention to what was going on.

If you have older parents, please pay attention to these smaller scams they are constantly being bombarded with.
Read 4 tweets
May 30
To be clear, I did exactly to Luca what he claims I did.

Only he didn't know I was doing it for the hour or so it was happening.

Then, all of the hundreds of replies were revealed at the same time, and he had a complete meltdown.

I've done this before to other trolls.
Nobody else knew either, since no notifications went out.
But to be fair, he came into my tweet and trolled it.

Which is a declaration of unconstrained war in my book.
Read 5 tweets
May 30
I haven't blocked @Luca_Napoletano, but he's locked his account and blocked me.

He's apparently wandering around and commenting in my tweets while whining about being bullied.

The dude needs to get over it and go away. Image
This still totally confuses me. Image
You all know that Luca is going to show up and comment, right?

If he hasn't already. 🤣
Read 22 tweets
Apr 26
BREAKING: The FAA has grounded the SpaceX Starship program pending a mishap investigation This will most likely take many months to complete and require an extensive remediation plan before being allowed to launch again.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(