On Nov 14th, Yemen announced they would begin targeting Israeli-flagged ships in retaliation for the massacre of Palesitnains in Gaza.
Earlier today, Yemen captured a ship in the Red Sea, an act which may turn out to be the most significant development in the war so far.
Why?🧵
Marine shipping accounts for 80% of the world's trade in goods, and a full 12% of ships pass through the Suez Canal.
The southern end of the Suez is accessed via the Red Sea, which in turn is accessed via the Bab-el-Maneb, a constriction less than 30 km across at its narrowest.
The ship, a vehicle carrier named ‘Galaxy Leader’, was captured by Yemen’s AnsarAllah in the Red Sea off of Yemen’s coast and has been docked in Yemen’s Al Hudaydah on the west coast.
Galaxy Leader is partially-owned by Israeli billionaire Rami Abraham Ungar.
Ungar has a long history of quid pro quo with the former chief of Israel's external intelligence agency, Yossi Cohen.
Ungar also sits on the Board for the INSS, Israel’s most influential think tank, and is well connected to current Minister of Defence, Yoav Gallant. Needless to say, Ungar is a very powerful and well-connected person within Israel.
Thus, this ship was targeted for a reason.
Israeli officials are both denying the ship is Israeli while attributing this ship capturing action to “Iran-backed Houthi rebels”.
But the reality is that AnsarAllah, or “Houthi-rebels” as they’re branded by the west, control 70% of the country, including the capital city.
Back in April, delegates from the KSA and Oman visited Sana’a and recognized the National Salvation Government, a coalition government led by AnsarAllah, as the de facto government of Yemen.
So far from being an act of “rebels”, the ship was captured by Yemen’s government.
While the ship has been captured with dozens of crew aboard, none of the crew are likely to be Israeli nationals, and thus are useless for leverage in negotiations.
So why might Yemen have captured it?
Two reasons.
Firstly, as a deterrent to future Israel-connected ships from using the Suez, driving up the cost.
And secondly, it forces the US to now make a decision: Respond to this ship capture, or continue pretending as if Oct 7th hasn’t yet escalated into a wider war.
Option 1: Ignore
The most obvious course of action is to do nothing. But if the US keeps pretending this is solely an Israel/Hamas war, it runs a risk of an insubordinate Israel taking matters into their own hands against Yemen, and rolling the dice on uncontrolled escalation.
Option 2: Force a ceasefire
Despite the lamentations of US politicians, the US unequivocally *does* have leverage to force an immediate ceasefire in Gaza by restricting US weapon shipments, pulling naval support from the Med, and stopping supporting the ground invasion of Gaza.
However, Israel’s current government will not accept a ceasefire and have openly threatened the US and rest of the world with retaliation if such a solution is forced on them.
Option 3: Recruit the Saudis
The US may try to petition the KSA to exert diplomatic pressure on Yemen.
However, as the US loses the ability to exert hegemonic control over the region, Saudis no longer see them as a reliable long-term partners and are unlikely to grant this favor
On the contrary, today the Saudi FM announced their intent to begin building a broad coalition on Monday, with the first stop being China. The purpose of this coalition appears anti-hegemonic to force a ceasefire asap and begin the process of bringing stability to the region.
US naval assets are already positioned in the south end of the Red Sea. Earlier this week, a US naval destroyer was targeted by and shot down a solitary Yemeni drone.
But if US warships remain in the area, or attack Yemen, the next drone will bring friends.
Back in August, Yemen’s Deputy FM announced that any US forces approaching Yemen’s territorial waters could trigger the beginning of “the longest and most costly battle in human history”. Based on Yemeni actions since Oct 7th, there’s little reason to think they're bluffing.
In the midst of unequivocal warnings from Yemen, and Israel's spiraling instability, it’s still unclear which path the US intends to take.
But in failing to set a clear course through stormy waters, one will be chosen by those who have. And right now, Yemen is leading the way.
The spark ignited by Al-Aqsa flood is now being fueled by the brave people of Yemen. And not only is the light of that fire exposing the US and Israel as the pariah states that they are, it is revealing a truth about the new world: only multilateralism can defeat unilateralism.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Be prepared for a US foreign policy pivot to attempt to save what is now (correctly) seen as a growing risk of losing their forward-operating base in the Middle East by blaming the intelligence failure of Oct 7 and subsequent bungled response solely on Netanyahu.
The rapidly mounting tally of Isreali soldier deaths from the failed ground invasion, combined with the international black eye from supporting a horrifying genocide, is further eroding what little soft power the US has left.
In shifting the blame onto Netanyahu, the US hopes to put in place a new custodian of the occupation that can more effectively manage the PR disaster of this war, as well as alleviate the growing contradictions of a settler-colonial state in crisis. But there’s another reason.
In response to the significant losses Israel sustained after it launched a war against Lebanon in 2006, the US and Israel began developing a short-range air defense system called Iron Dome.
And for the first time since then, Iron Dome is at risk of being defeated. 🧵
Iron Dome has 10 missile batteries in operation throughout Israel, with the key component being the Tamir missiles.
The missiles are designed to intercept incoming Qassam rockets. Famously, each missile costs $80,000, while Hamas’s rockets can be produced for <1/100th the cost.
While Iron Dome is 90% effective against small volleys of rockets, it can easily be overwhelmed. This was demonstrated on Oct 7 when the 3-5,000 barrage of rockets Hamas launched reached targets throughout Israel.
If you’re watching this apocalyptic genocide unfold before your eyes and you feel powerless to stop it, please read. 🧵
Al-Aqsa Flood was a meticulously planned operation by a group with intimate knowledge of their enemy
What that means is the planners did not only anticipate Israel might retaliate with this current level of unrestrained brutality, they were counting on it
So what are its goals?
Goal 1: Expose the weakness of the IOF
The IOF relies almost entirely on air superiority. They cannot fight on the ground.
By repelling IOF ground incursions, Gazans are demonstrating to their brothers and sisters in the West Bank that Israel is a paper tiger.
This'll sound completely absurd to people who subscribe to the "brainwashing" theory of propaganda, but the reason people seem to be seeing through the lies now isn't because of "TikTok" or "Trump".
It's because there is less material benefit to doing so. 🧵
Part of becoming a communist is realizing that people aren't mindless sheep. They are largely rational actors that are constantly adapting and internalizing a framework that they feel best explains and justifies their material reality.
Historically, buying into the myth surrounding the bloody maintenance of US empire made sense because doing so paid dividends in the form of a comfortable home, decent pay, and a paltry social safety net.
Some are bewildered at the apparent lack of forewarning of the Al-Aqsa flood and feel it’s not possible that Israel was caught unaware, and thus conclude the current offensive must be a false-flag by the IDF.
However there’s a much simpler explanation: Huawei 🧵
Earlier this summer, both Russia and China moved to ban iPhones for workers in government or state-owned firms. The implication was clear: despite heavy marketing to the contrary, iPhone security is compromised.
In truth, it’s been obvious for a while that the US’s frantic attempts to stymie Huawei phones and 5G don’t hinge solely on wanting to eliminate corporate competition; they’re also about preventing the loss of critical back-doors that enable the US’s global surveillance network.
They do. And Evergrande is a great example of why. 🧵
Billionaires are the inevitable end-result of the tendency toward monopolies in capitalist markets; a flurry of mergers, acquisitions, & bankruptcies eventually produces a winner.
In the west, winners go on to rewrite the regulatory landscape to permanently cement their victory.
In China, billionaires arise in much the same way, but once risen, are effectively stuck at the summit of an island, with no special political power or influence over the regulations that stand in the way of further growth.