Page 5. Venue could be challenged by Media Matters as I believe X corp still maintains its corporate headquarters and its brain trust operations center in California.
Expect Media Matters to challenge Venue and ask for a move to California.
Note the defamation mention.
Here are two of the three causes of action. 1. Interference with a Contract. Referring to the ad buy contracts between X and Apple, Disney, et al.
The Third and last Cause of Action (COA) Interference with Prospective Economic advantage.
The first two causes of action concern past and current damages ($). This COA concerns future damages based on the conduct of Media Matters. This could be an astronomical $ number. More than enough to Bankrupt Media Matters.
Of note, X did not name anyone (David Brock) personally.
🥺
The demand? Basically take down the MM article and pay for damages.
Keep in mind many others are joining in and suing MM today too including the state of Texas based on post by Trump ally Attorney General Ken Paxton, Tim Pool and potentially several other states.
Wheeeee! 😂
DOC
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The new “Pandemic” that some call “White Lung”, Is a mycoplasma Infection. (MI) MI is something that’s been with us for a long time. It is, and has been, a clinical sign of a damaged or depleted immune system. Particularly T-cell and T-helper cells. my.clevelandclinic.org/health/body/24…
T-cell depletion in Immune Systems historically has been seen in Cancer and AIDS; now, there is strong evidence it is also caused by the COVID-19 JAB. While it may be affecting some children. An un-jabbed child or infant is much more likely to survive an MI infection because a child’s immune response is superior to a healthy adult.
Studies have confirmed that the jab kills T-cells. This study confirms it but wrongly concludes that the depletion of T-cells is temporary. I'm afraid that's not right. The spike protein replication in some jabbed patients forever damages the Immune System.
This is evidence of a Bioweapon designed for slow death.
DARPA and the DOD funded the original gain of function-produced Sars Cov1 and Sars Cov-2 virus(s) The Covid-19 Jab was/is Bioweapon. I wrote about it here in May of this year.
I include proof and sources in this Substack from May of this year.
The Substack is free.
#DOCThread.
In light of the passing of Diane Finestein this morning and the speculation about Biden pardoning his family and then resigning after the opening of the House Impeachment Inquiry. here is my first substack I wrote back in April in thread form.
Hail to the Chief: "President Harris"
THE 45TH AND A HALF PRESIDENT.
WHO REPLACES JOE BIDDEN IN 2023?
Will Joe make it to 2024 and run for re-election? Probably not. Here’s why: There are those on both the Left and even some on the Right, including some Gov. Ron DeSantis, supporters who believe Biden will win against Trump because “Orange man bad.”
Democrats seemingly believe that Biden actually got more votes than Trump in 2020 and the election was just Hunky-Dory. “Fraud? No fraud… nope.” Biden supporters also believe Joewill prevail in 2024 because that’s what the Corporate Media tells them to think twenty-four even. They might actually believe it even though Trump was the first President in history to lose re-election in 2020, even though he received ~10% more votes in 2020 than he did in 2016! No President in history has received more votes on re-election than in his first term and lost. Anecdotal proof that the election was stolen. But, more on that in future Stacks.
By comparison, Obama had ~ 3.5 million fewer votes during his historic run in 2008 (TV: 69,498,516 ) than in his reelection in 2012 (T.V.: 65,899,660). Like most incumbents, President Obama lost votes, millions of them the second time around. Conversely, Trump gained more than 7 million votes between 2012, when he beat Hillary “the Sure-Thing” Clinton, and 2020, when Trump lost to the corrupt, incestuous, traitorous pedophile Scranton: Joe Biden.
Putting the stolen election of 2020 aside, the Democrats find themselves in a pickle; Joe Biden is a dead man walking, politically speaking. “Pedo Peter,” as his son Hunter calls him, is tremendously unpopular.
"For years, the SEC allowed the burgeoning crypto industry to operate openly, permitting it to grow into the trillion-dollar industry it is today. As recently as 2021, SEC Chair Gensler publicly acknowledged that no “regulatory framework” existed under the authority of the SEC for crypto exchanges and that “only Congress” could confer that authority. In late 2022, however, the SEC suddenly reversed course and asserted that virtually all crypto assets are securities subject to its authority. Soon after, and despite ongoing legislative debate regarding crypto assets, the SEC began enforcing its new position through litigation. Indeed, since 2019, Congress has considered more than a dozen proposals that would provide a coherent and workable framework for crypto assets and their trading platforms. Critically, none of those proposals would confer sole regulatory jurisdiction over the crypto industry to the SEC. Despite this, the SEC now seeks to expand its authority and filed this lawsuit, asserting claims against Binance Holdings Limited (“BHL”) and Changpeng Zhao, among others. It is clear that the SEC’s lawsuit has no foundation in the currently enacted securities laws."
What Binance does:
"In 2017, before the SEC issued any guidance about the regulatory status of crypto assets or exchanges, was founded outside the United States. is now the largest platform for trading crypto assets in the world. This case involves some of the products traded on or offered by . One such token, BNB, was created during the launch of and is now traded freely around the world on multiple platforms. Another token, BUSD, is a stablecoin, meaning that it maintains a stable value of $1. People worldwide use BUSD and other stablecoins as a convenient way to transfer money, including in countries that lack stable financial systems."Binance.com Binance.com
Missouri v. Biden
5th Circuit Court of Appeals Decision. Has Social Media Speech been Saved?
A DOC Thread.
Recently, the State of Louisiana, Missouri, Jim Hoft (@gatewaypundit), Dr. Jay Bhattercharya (@DrJBhattacharya), and a few others filed suit against the Biden Administration, including Tony Fauci claiming that they were violating the First Amendment and were suppressing Speech through their influence over social media owners and operators that was objectionable to our current government.
Yesterday, Friday, September 8, the Appellate Court issued a ruling in support of the lower Court's Injunction ordering the government to cease such practices immediately while the trial on the merits continues in the Federal trial court.
Here are the details,
In justifying the ruling, the Appellate Court first introduced the claims of the plaintiffs. They had all been de-platformed ("downgraded or removed flagged posts and de-platformed users") and had been damaged when they were removed from social media platforms or had accurate news and content banned on social media.
Examples of banned content that received government censorship included:
"The lab-leak theory, pandemic lockdowns, vaccine side --effects, election fraud and the Hunter Biden laptop story"
This is basically the content I have been sharing for years!!!
This account was banned in 2018 with 3000 followers. It did not come back until March 2023 and has grown massively since using the same content mix of science, law, medicine, and politics.
In the interrum, I had 16 accounts banned as I received a permanent suspension at some point.
So, thank you Elon....
The government said their efforts: “sought to mitigate the hazards of online MISINFORMATION.
Orwell.
They did so by “calling attention to content that violated the platform policies”
Federal Court Appeal for a Dismissal of the Georgia Indictment of D.J. Trump et al. for Chief of Staff Mark Meadows - A DOC Analysis Thread
Meadows demands the Federal Court dismiss the Georgia State indictment because his conduct was
1.permissible under the Supremacy Clause & Federal law, 2. under the First Amendment protections for Political Speech, 3. and for Violations of the 14th Amendment Due Process guarantees.
Meadows attorneys have already filled a Motion in State Court to be heard on the 28 of August.
The State may also dismiss the Indictment against Meadows on their own.