Leftist historians have, after decades, finally overreached.
In recent weeks, multiple articles have made insane claims: Elagabalus was trans, black women were the biggest victims of the plague in England, etc.
And… nobody has cared.
1/
For the past few years, these absurd claims and re-definitions have garnered attention and outrage as people lament that our historical institutions have been taken over by nutjobs.
Now, they’re just disregarded as crazy people spouting lowbrow propaganda.
And rightfully so.
I see this as part of a larger shift away from trusting institutions for historical knowledge.
More people are looking into old books, and learning to disregard any vaguely-liberal interpretation of the past.
This is progress — we are reviving old narratives and building anew.
What’s more is that proper histories are getting far more attention on social media than revisionism out of the Guardian, BBC, etc.
This is why they screech about @elonmusk’s takeover of X — in a fair environment, traditional media loses every time against social media.
In general, the trend is toward a rightful distrust of mainstream institutions — but people’s interest in academic topics has not waned, and is instead applied toward more interesting and truthful alternatives.
Consider @costin_eats’ book, which sold incredibly well.
The future of news, history, and philosophy is outside of institutions.
We are winning!
By the way, if you are interested in supporting this sort of dissident, outsider history, below is my newest project:
Christian charity has overextended itself and become a farce. Most of it today is misdirected and detrimental.
Traditionally, the charity actions of a local church have been focused on its own community — helping its members and other locals in times of need, uplifting the poor, etc. But in the early 20th century, primarily after WWI, socialism-friendly actors in the American Catholic bureaucracy directed the notion of charity outwards… the core goal shifting from uplifting a single community to functioning as a network, to uplift the “global standard of living”, to put more on welfare, etc. @Pope_head talks about this well — it went hand-in-hand with a total deracination of Catholic doctrine and faith.
The results are self-evident. Propagation of faraway dependents while the core rots in times of dire need — this is the core of Christian charity actions today. Empathy directed to some vague notion of The Global Poor, church funds expropriated to NGOs and such that spend 90% of it on “overhead” and the rest on propagating infinite Africans, Guatemalans, etc.
Around the same time, Catholic organizations took a particular interest in aiding immigration to the US, as their core support base was Italian, Irish, etc. At some point, the implicit goal of these organizations (sponsorship of one’s own people) was lost, and they, too are now focused on bringing various third world peoples to the US en masse.
The typical stereotype of an immigration NGO is Jewish leadership, and this has truth to it — but you would be surprised how many major players are explicitly Christian/Catholic. Many of the strongest proponents of infinity immigrants are misguided or liberal Christians.
Christianity is a faith that emphasizes empathy… but this virtue can be twisted in such a way that it defeats the whole point, enriching others that have nothing but hatred for us and allowing religious communities to languish while their tithes and donations are exported.
This is supported at every level, up to our idiot Pope who regularly does things like comparing Somali rapists to souls trying to enter heaven. Twisted Christian empathy is also the force that encourages liberalization, “trans acceptance” farces, and more.
Christians, Catholics especially: be aware of exactly who is pulling at your heartstrings… and your purse-strings.
A more proper view of Christian empathy can be found in the medieval Church and its adherents.
Effective Christian charity looks like local beautification, debt forgiveness, housing funds for young churchgoers, etc.
Not giving 10% of everybody’s income in Nowhere, Arkansas to building a well in some random tribe in West Africa that will soon break and never be repaired
As for “inner-city” parishes, I would argue that turning the local Knights of Columbus into a group of young men concerned with the imposition of order has a far higher ROI than food drives for drug addicts and derelicts.
I’ve just finished digitizing Gaspar de Carvajal’s Relación — a wild account of the first European trip down the length of the Amazon.
It’ll be out in print soon… but in the meantime, some crazy observations:
1/
Orellana and his small band of conquistadors completed the trip on two brigantines, which they made when they realized they’d have to follow the river all the way.
None of them had any shipbuilding experience.
This trip was not a military conquest. It was an act of desperation, which became a brutal fight for survival by a few men far out of their depth.
Every man was wounded at least once; food was rare; the crew nearly died countless times.
Many of the greatest works of the Age of Exploration are out of print today, only available in web archives and awful scans.
The stories of Vasco da Gama, Francisco de Orellana, and more deserve greater availability.
I’m going to republish them.
1/
Yesterday, I posted this short thread highlighting the poor availability of these works, and many wanted to contribute or help.
After the success of republishing Samuel Chamberlain’s “My Confession,” I’ll follow the same format here.
If you don’t know me, I founded @Dissident_Rev, republishing rare books in print — from R. H. Davis’ war journalism to Samuel Chamberlain’s memoir of Western adventure.
I believe that these primary sources should be accessible with a level of quality that does them justice.
In 410 AD, Alaric I, King of the Visigoths sacked the Eternal City for the first time in centuries.
This event is emotionally loaded, and endlessly politicized today — but here, I will attempt to do justice to Alaric’s story.
1/
The sack of Rome has always been a hot-button issue in historiography.
Claudian called Alaric a “pirate”; Gibbon deemed him a “victorious general”.
His humiliation of Rome tends to stir the emotions of historians, and to make Alaric a blank slate for their beliefs.
Recently, the liberal historian Douglas Boin has provided the latest instance of molding Alaric into a political weapon, with his book “Alaric the Goth.”
Here, Boin characterizes Alaric as a “refugee” tangling with “border control” and “xenophobia.
You need to understand that Lib Brain is not some kind of complex tangle of ideas. It's just Hating White People. They hate Nazis because they see them as Ultimate White People... but even the men who defeated them are still Bad White People.
The idea that leftism is this weird ideological niche that you get to via years of academic conditioning is no longer the case, and hasn't been so for years
It's just a general osmosis of White People Bad with a veneer of haughty words when necessary
There's no "theory." The "theory" running the gamut today is post-hoc rationalization of White People Bad, which has been the cultural standard and accepted norm for at least 10 years