1. #CTIFiles3
SOCKPUPPETS AND SPIES
In the #CTIFiles written about today by @shellenberger and @galexybrane, anti-disinformation warriors and officials offer instruction on COINTELPRO-style spy tactics, against a target they knew was forbidden – the American public
2. WHAT WE NEED: “SOCKPUPPETS ON TWITTER AND FACEBOOK”
While #TwitterFiles confirmed use of defensive tactics like censorship/deamplification, the #CTIFiles show “anti-disinformation” operatives planning to go on offense to disrupt speech, using fake personas and spy tactics
3. “YOUR SPY DISGUISE…LOCK YOUR SHIT DOWN.”
CTI League trainings instructed members on creating phony identities to infiltrate groups “like Boogaloo”
4. “BURNER PHONES”
CTI League members were handed a “Big Book of Disinformation Response” that offered instruction in the use of burner phones and emails:
5. “CAN WE GET ALL TROLL ON THEIR BUMS?”
In a CTI “incident report” about anti-lockdown memes, researchers asked if they had enough to ask for accounts to be taken down – and if not, “Can we get all troll on their bums”?
6. “WE CAN ALSO TAKE ACTIONS LIKE TAKEDOWNS”
A whistleblower told Public and Racket that the CTIL founder claimed to have induced the FBI to remove some content via DNS takedown, and a CTI incident report appears to refer to this capability
7. “BASICALLY WE’RE USING MANY OF THE SAME TECHNIQUES AS THE BAD GUYS”
Over and over in CTIL training videos and documents, participants talk about doing the same things as “the bad guys,” but supposedly for good reasons.
8. “EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN… AGAINST U.S. CITIZENS”
In a training video, key CTIL member Pablo Breuer says the most capable agency for anti-disinfo work would be the Defense Department, only it's “expressly forbidden” to operate “against U.S. citizens”
9. “THE PEOPLE WHO DO IT OVERSEAS ARE TYPICALLY THE CIA AND NSA”
Breuer, of the Navy and SOCOM, adds the people who “do it overseas” are typically CIA, NSA, and DoD, but “intel collection agencies are not legally allowed to do those things” in the US
10. “WHAT DO WE DO WITH JOHN AND JANE Q CITIZEN THAT ACTUALLY WATCH FOX NEWS?”
Explaining that the agencies currently doing this work domestically – DHS and the Global Engagement Center – are “not very capable,” he says, “We need to help them out.”
11. “THEY DID SOME REALLY INTERESTING FALSE FLAG OPERATIONS”
In another CTIL training video, @rz_analyst lauds NATO member Turkey for “some really interesting false flags,” including to "pin ISIS bombings on the Kurds"
12. GPT: “THE GOOD GUYS CAN USE IT TOO”
In another video, CTI leader/founder SJ Terp talks about new AI programs like ChatGPT generating “credible texts, credible sentences,” and though “the bad guys can use it,” so can the good guys, she says.
13. INFILTRATE, HONEYPOT, FAKE
The AMITT framework developed in part by CTIL founders, features 223 tactical “counters” including fake sites, infiltration, and tabletop exercises to prep for misinformation – as happened with the Hunter Biden laptop story
14. “MAKE LIBERTY GREAT AGAIN… PROBABLY NOT OUR CURRENT TARGET”
CTIL analysts were often unable or unwilling to distinguish legitimate speech – like opposing lockdowns – from “disinformation.” In this incident report, #openamericanow and “Make Liberty Great Again” are suspect
15. “WE SHOULD HAVE SEEN THIS COMING”
Another report lists a “Declaration of Independence is my permission slip” meme as a problem. That analysts feared even such memes is no surprise – one CTI doc noted satire was "sometimes used as a gateway drug into more worrying groups.”
16. “WE HAD SATIRE DETECTORS"
CTIL’s Terp: “Things like satire are really hard. We actually had satire detectors at one thing I worked on because it just shows up as positive even though it's completely negative… irony just doesn't work on machines.”
17. “WE’RE ALREADY BUILDING AND USING BOTS”
From an entry in the CTI “Big Book”:
18. WATCHING LEFT MOVEMENTS, TOO
CTIL often strayed from Covid to political matters, usually focused on Trump and Republicans, but not always. Docs show interest in the US Campaign for Palestinian Rights (@USPCR_), the @DemSocialists , #HealthCareForAll,” and other progressives
19. “ELECTION 2020… A VERY END OF THE WORLD TYPE OF MOMENT”
CTIL members were often extreme partisans who seemed to believe anything was justified to stop Donald Trump, whose potential election in 2020 was framed by one analyst as literal apocalypse
20: NEXT: “ANTI-DISINFORMATION” AS PARTISAN SCAM
Watch this space soon for more about the CTI League’s political bias, its role in shaping election moderation operations, and more bizarre AMITT “counters”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. #CTIFIles2
INTRODUCING THE #CTIFiles
The Deep State, With Its Pants Down
2. Tuesday, @Shellenberger, @galexybrane and I began releasing the CTI League (CTIL) Files. Provided by a whistleblower, they detail activities of a group ostensibly formed for the narrow purpose of fighting Covid misinfo. We quickly found they had wider interests:
3. “I DON’T KNOW A LOT, BUT…”
The documents equal or exceed the #TwitterFiles in explosiveness, offering a devastating portrait of the digital censorship sector – from breathtaking authoritarian views to comic ignorance and lack of self-awareness.
1. THE “UK FILES” SPECIAL REPORT
PART ONE: Internal Labour Party Documents Link “Center For Countering Digital Hate” to key Labour faction, fake news episodes
2. On July 31, X/Twitter filed suit against the UK-based Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) for “a series of unlawful acts” it claimed were part of “a scare campaign to drive away advertisers from the X platform.” pacermonitor.com/view/NV3GMHQ/X…
3. U.S. media unfailingly described the suit as an attempt to evade “accountability” by attacking a “nonprofit” conducting “research” on “hate speech.” The Washington Post said X “without evidence” accused CCDH of ties to “potentially even foreign governments”:
1. TWITTER FILES EXTRA:
BIG BROTHER IS FLAGGING YOU
New House report and previously unpublished Twitter Files show: Stanford’s Election Integrity Partnership was a front for government censorship
2. On Monday, @Jim_Jordan's Weaponization of Government Subcommittee released a damning report on the “Weaponization of Disinformation.” Packed with subpoenaed documents, it focused on Stanford’s Election Integrity Partnership: judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subs…
3. The report showed the EIP, when it flagged 2020 election content, was a stand-in for the Department of Homeland Security.
“We just set up an election integrity partnership at the request of DHS/CISA,” wrote Graham Brookie of Atlantic Council, an EIP partner:
The new Twitter Files stories show: 1) The CEO of the Senate’s top expert on Russian bots, New Knowledge, helped create the Hamilton 68 dashboard;
2) New Knowledge also worked with the Democracy Integrity Project on another “dashboard” project, Disinfo 2018, used as a source to smear @TulsiGabbard;
3) Twitter did not think the issues at New Knowledge were confined to its CEO. One executive also warned about the former NK research chief Renee DiResta, who led Stanford’s Election Integrity Partnership:
1. TWITTER FILES EXTRA
The Senate, New Knowledge, and Manufacturing Russian Bot Hysteria
Reporting by @SchmidtSue1
2. On December 17, 2018, a new report to the Senate Intelligence Committee describing pervasive Russian bot activity generated scare headlines by the dozen:
3. Virginia Senator Mark Warner of the Senate Intelligence Committee called it a “bombshell”:
1. TWITTER FILES: Missouri v. Biden edition
"Thank you for your ongoing collaboration!"
2. After a controversial decision in the Missouri v. Biden lawsuit, here are a few docs from the Twitter Files, illustrating what the Attorneys General meant when they claimed a “Censorship Enterprise” exists.
3. Judge Terry Doughty in his ruling said the government “significantly encouraged” and “coerced” tech platforms into censoring content. What might “significant encouragement” look like?