Managed to catch up with Gove's evidence to the Inquiry. It was painful to watch! Politicking at an epic level - trying to obfuscate blame away from him but not overtly dropping others in it...but he did, and like all Ministers he tried to throw scientists under the bus
1/n
Gove was effectively head of the Cabinet Office from Feb 2020. As such, he was responsible for the office meant to take a leadership role during the emergency pandemic phase...
Even from Gove's evidence alone, it was clear the Cabinet Office didn't.
KC: Who was responsible for the failures of the Cabinet Office
MG: blah, blah…structural problems…not me
KC: asks where the failure was
MG: Not the civil servants - the finest in the country.
KC: The Cabinet Office was not fit for purpose?
MG: Yes.
He then apologises to the victims. Politicians make mistakes but he is sorry.
Gove then goes on to suggest these problems have been present for many years…trying to perhaps proportion some of the blame to preceding governments. Desperate.
Apparently, some of the Cabinet was “shielded” from him and his ability to affect or lead those parts of the Cabinet was impaired. He made several suggestions for reform to No.10, “including to Dominic Cummings”
So, it wasn't his fault they were hiding from him. Desperate.
KC: Why didn’t you change this before the pandemic? “Why did you take no steps to correct or improve the Cabinet Office?”
MG: I was too busy sorting out Brexit. He then talks of political theory…blah, blah.
KC: were you aware of the dysfunctionality at No 10?
MG: That’s just number 10….it is always the case by its nature.
KC: The govt response was deficient…significantly off the mark, wasn’t it?
MG: It was hard for all countries, but there were unique errors to the UK govt.
KC: But wasn’t there a failure due to the chaotic and dysfunctional nature of No 10 & the govt?
MG: We’re all individuals (or something like that)
In fairness, he does acknowledge that central govt should have taken on the cross-govt leadership earlier, although then blames DHSC that it wanted to hold onto the power and “rise to the occasion”. (Reference to Matt Hancock).
KC discloses a potential line of questioning the Inquiry may take with Hancock - they did not share information or decision making and that is not how govt works.
And this, from what we know of him, is likely to be true. He probably hoarded much of the decision-making.
MG gives a very clear line of attack for Matt Hancock and the DHSC without actually saying “Matt Hancock”. 'We trusted them'. 'We thought we were well-prepared'.
While probably true, as a Govt Minister to not be asking questions or know what's going on during a pandemic is odd!
KC kills him in his questioning…Gove says that the Cabinet Office should have taken a leadership role and been challenging other departments to ensure they are stepping up. A clear admission that the Cabinet was not doing that
Because “Hancock was marking his own homework”…there was no central scrutiny or challenge by central govt.
Hancock is going to get reamed on Thursday
They are trying to hang it on him...
KC makes the point that in reality you and other Ministers had not taken the time to review the govt’s pandemic plan [I find this extraordinary. Imagine being a govt Minister during a pandemic and not having familiarised yourself with the central plan?]
KC: There was no debate about how to stop or slow the virus, was there?
MG: There would have been debate in SAGE.
[Unbelievable!!! Govt Ministers were not engaged at all in the high-impact decisions about how to control a virus across the country.]
And then WhatsAPPs to the rescue! Gove basically tells a completely different tale in his testimony on 03/03/20 than he just spent an hour spouting in the Inquiry. Damning! Note, he is not blaming scientists here, he is clearly saying we the government are "fucking up".
Gove may have mitigated some of the deep water Hancock is facing by saying they both were pushing Johnson to act around 14th of March. That suggests the delay from that point in acting was purely on Johnson.
Hilarious, Gove says that Johnson was not oscillating on decision-making but he had a “Gladitorial style” sometimes arguing differing propositions out loud to test them and see which argument was best….my god! That is some slinky logic.
Gove claims that he thought a Lockdown should be taken on 10th March. But he didn’t suggest it in the COBR meeting he chaired the following week. He regrets not saying something.
That is as far as I have got, and now I need to wash my brain with detergent (or maybe blowing a hairdryer up my nose can wash away the eye-watering levels of bulls!ting I just witnessed).
In summary...
Gove failed. He failed to respond as a person in his position should have. He failed again to be open enough with the Inquiry for us to learn fully from those mistakes. He is not the principal assailant, but he was and continues to be an accessory, no doubt.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Prof Dame Harries testimony was the most illuminating of the week so far
Bear in mind, Johnson only needed a handful of scientists to agree with his callous “take it on the chin” response
The Inquiry seems to ask whether Harries was one of them
1/n
Harries is the head of the new UKHSA - the body now in place to lead on the next pandemic.
The Inquiry is right to make this point. This will be the person in charge next time there is a pandemic and their beliefs and approach will affect us all
Inquiry brings in a Telegraph interview Harries gave saying that the likelihood of mandatory restrictions is a lot less and diminishing. She advocates for individual responsibility. This may well mean more “taking it on the chin” for the next pandemic
Matt Hancock in the Covid Inquiry...unlucky for him it's my day off, so here goes the live tweeting
Please mute this thread if you are not interested.
Firstly, the state of the Department for Health and Social Care (DHSC).
Hancock gets tetchy 'not clear that Valance's diary entries were written at the time and not with hindsight'
Ministers are clearly annoyed Valance had written it in the first place.
KC: DHSC was neither funded nor prepared for a health emergency like a pandemic
MH takes an interesting line where he kind of disagrees. Yes we should have been better prepared. But we did step up and achieved a lot - testing, vaccines.
Sadiq Khan’s testimony at the Covid Inquiry was full of frustration and criticism towards the government,…
but the failure to involve local leaders in the pandemic response is not just arrogant and disrespectful…
it had huge clinical (and economic) ramifications:
1/n
Take the example of restricting access to healthcare. In April 2020, there was very limited Covid outwith London, yet the central decision was to restrict access to the NHS for the entire country. We were stopped from seeking healthcare even if there was no Covid in our area.
Or the example of lockdowns, where we were all restricted based on the level of Covid nationally, even though many places had very little Covid. Kids didn’t go to school, elderly were left alone, work closed, etc…when it achieved no real effect on transmission.
He raises the threats against him and other advisers' families. Really as a nation, we should reflect on this. In particular, how certain aspects of the media a up so much animo
Van Tam agrees that interventions should have occurred "7 to 14 days earlier"
Judge asks, "Do you think lockdowns could have been avoided had we acted sooner?"
VT: says again, the common theme is that the NHS just didn't have the capacity to allow no lockdowns.
So, it's my day off and I have a cold. As sad as it is, I have found myself live-tweeting the Covid Inquiry.
Please do mute this thread if you are not interested.
It is Professor of Mathematical Biology, Prof MacLean, and the dumpster fire that is Kemi Badenoch today.
Prof Maclean says that Prof Reilly who is normally very cautious had said they would need to go into lockdown and stay there for quite some time on the 10th of March. She was very concerned that Ministers just didn't get the calamity that was to follow.
I find this incredible. By now we are at 13th of March and this is the first time we are modelling worst-case scenario versus true NHS capacity
The point made by Prof Maclean here is that if NHS capacity is very low then the effort to suppress will need to be monumental
Part 2 of Prof Whitty's testimony to @covidinquiryuk
This concludes Whitty's evidence for Module 2 of the Inquiry (he will be back).
My initial impression of Whitty and the decision-making at the heart of government during 2020...
1/n
2/ The questions to be answered by Whitty in regards to the UK’s delayed response to the pandemic is whether...
a) was his position one of “watch and wait” and he therefore added to the harmful delays?
or
b) did he fail to convey the urgency of the matter to Ministers?
3/ As for point a)... It was apparent that he was at times too slow to act, as Whitty acknowledged himself:
“Now, as we will I'm sure come on to, my view is, with the benefit of hindsight, we went a bit too late on the first wave, and I've been clear about that for some time.”