Breeauna Sagdal Profile picture
Nov 30 5 tweets 3 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
A letter sent to the SEC related to Natural Asset Companies, by U.S. Senators @MikeCrapo
@SenatorRicketts
and Senator James E. Risch details multiple points of concern and demands answers no later than tomorrow, November 30, 2023
- Risch.senate.gov
risch.senate.gov/public/_cache/…

Image
Image
Further down the "mitigation ruse," rabbit hole.

Meanwhile, NEPA (National Environmental Protection Agency) has determined that Green Energy Technologies pose no inherent risk to human life or the environment and therefore certain infrastructure is categorically excluded from having to produce Environmental Impact Statements. Meaning the Biden Administration is continually making executive and unilateral decisions about climate change mitigation (AKA "bold actions"), picking winners and losers in an emerging non-competitive, monopolistic industry, backed by the full-weight of the federal government.

This is insane given the amount of evidence we currently have, showing the negative impacts upon avian life due to solar farms—now categorically excluded under recent NEPA rule changes.

"In this proposed rulemaking, DOE proposes to add a categorical exclusion for certain energy storage systems and revise categorical exclusions for upgrading and rebuilding transmission lines and for solar photovoltaic (PV) systems, as well as make conforming changes to related sections of DOE's NEPA regulations."

Concluding thoughts:

As the Biden Administration continues down this path of taking more land, both private and public, without the means to properly manage it resulting in devastating fires that dump billions of CO2 PPM into our atmosphere annually, along with reducing grazing rights to the point of the US becoming a net importer of meats from other countries using billions of gallons of fossil fuels annually, and continues to prioritize untested technologies exempt from having to prove they're better for the environment or actually mitigating global emissions - perhaps it's time for more Americans to start asking questions and requesting their own Senators to follow the example set by Senators Risch, Ricketts and Crapo.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Breeauna Sagdal

Breeauna Sagdal Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Breeauna9

Nov 24
🧵Sen. Gary Peters Crowned The Whopper King🧵

The Democratic Senate Campaign Committee (DSCC) is playing fast and loose with the facts. Honestly, an FEC ethics violation is warranted given these whoppers. At the head of the DSCC sits Michigan Senator Gary Peters—The Whopper King.

According to DSCC, the PAC is focused on flipping senate seats in Florida and Texas. However, aside from being completely inaccurate, the actual messaging of the PAC, geared towards donors via ActBlue, is solely critical of HOUSE Republicans.

Some of the allegations made by this PAC range from scaring recipients into believing that their Reproductive Rights are in jeopardy due to "MAGA Republicans in the House," even after Roe was turned over to the states and Congress has no power.

Now, I've received a text alert claiming that Speaker Johnson is trying to cut 1.5 Trillion in Social Security benefits and Medicare.

So what's Peters actually up to, and what's the truth behind these whoppers?

Let's take a look:


Image
Image
Image
2. It’s worth noting Social Security is in financial trouble and its funding is expected to be depleted as soon as 2033, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

So let's begin with looking into what's draining Social Security, because if you thought SSA was just a trust that went back to those who have paid into it their entire lives, you'll be shocked.
3. SSA is divided by titles, and most notable is Title IV-B through Title IV-D AKA "Foster Care."

That's right! The Foster Care system, funded at a whopping 12.9 billion per year, is taken out of Social Security to refund states and tribes for child removal, guardianship and more.

"The President’s FY2023 budget proposes $12.9 billion for support of child welfare activities authorized in Title IV-B and Title IV-E of the Social Security Act (SSA), the Child Abuse
Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA) and related programs, and the Victims of Child Abuse Act. This amount includes legislative proposals seeking increased mandatory funding for FY2023
of $744 million (above current law) and increased discretionary funding requests of $218 million
(above final FY2022 funding)"

Read 6 tweets
Aug 30
🧵"Free Lunch"🧵
A Hard Pill to Swallow?

Incoming progressive, Rep. Wittman (D-Brookings), has announced a legislative proposal for "Free School Lunch," that could quickly fuel the culture fire, depending on how it's funded.

Recently passed SD laws; protecting women in sports, and prohibiting puberty blockers for minors, would quickly be overturned if South Dakota's legislature agrees to accept federal funding for the School Lunch Program.

Under the Biden Administration's amendments to Title IX, South Dakota would also be mandated to incorporate gender identity and sexual orientation throughout K-12 curricula...1/2
The established policies "violate Title IX when they categorically ban transgender students from participating on sports teams consistent with their gender identity."

After redefining Title IX, the Biden Administration then directed the USDA to enforce adherence to the thousand-plus-paged document, by granting investigatory authority over recipients of the National School Lunch Program (FNS).

The action effectively leveraged federally funded school lunch, for mandatory compliance to the Title IX amendments.

“As a result, state and local agencies, program operators and sponsors that receive funds from FNS must investigate allegations of discrimination based on gender identity or sexual orientation,” USDA said in a statement. “Those organizations must also update their non-discrimination policies and signage to include prohibitions against discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation.”

The change means that schools receiving any kind of subsidized school lunch funding, will now be subject to the new Title IX LGBTQ interpretation.

@GovKristiNoem
has been adamant that South Dakota's State sovereignty will not be handed over for federal coin.

Still, left-leaning media and the SDDNC continue to message in lock-step, omitting the true costs of progressive policies. 2/2
This headline from the Argus Leader is completely false and unethical.

Read 5 tweets
Aug 22
🧵Do Federal Funds = Institutional Compliance?🧵

Last year, as South Dakota was appropriating daycare dollars from federal funds, I wrote an article about the fine print.

Many shrugged off concerns related to the fine print stating, "the pandemic is over."

But after a year, and billions spent, perhaps it's time to review that fine print, and see exactly what was agreed to in order to receive said funds?

Internal memo (below) originally shared by @stkirsch*
This may NOT be the case across the board, but in the case of South Dakota state licensed daycares who received federal funds, they had to check a box on the application agreeing to the following;

"17. Eligible providers must certify in their application to:

-being open and serving children during the grant periods

implementing policies, when open and providing services, that are in line with;
- guidance and orders from corresponding state and local authorities and, to the greatest extent possible, implementing policies in line with guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (available at )..."-DSS FAQ
What happens if these daycare providers accepted funds, and decide not to comply with the CDC guidelines?

"27. Under any circumstances, will I have to pay these funds back?

"These funds do not constitute a loan, and child care providers who comply with funding requirements will not be required to pay them back.

"However, funding recipients found to have violated the terms of the application process, certifications, or any provisions of the beneficiary agreement may have prior payments recouped, future payments discontinued, and/or be referred to the Office of Inspector General for additional action."-DSS FAQ linked in the above post.
Read 7 tweets
Aug 17
🧵 Thread on Oregon's new laws 🧵

According to legislative research council, detransitioning treatments are excluded from health insurance coverage, due to the following definition of what constitutes
“Gender-affirming treatment;”

"means a procedure, service, drug, device or product
that a physical or behavioral health care provider prescribes to treat an individual for
incongruence between the individual’s gender identity and the individual’s sex assignment
at birth."

The bill's mandate to health insurance companies creates a loophole in the language, excluding destrans individuals, as the incongruence is between their gender identity and the sex assignment made by medical professionals—as opposed to "at birth."
The bill, HB 2002, has also expanded the list of providers who can diagnose and prescribe gender affirming care, and reproductive health services to;
-Dentists, and unless for an initial eye exam for contacts,
-Optometrists
- Naturopathic Doctors
- Registered Nurses

*School based health clinics were removed from the enrolled version.
Extensive language has been dedicated to protecting prescribers from liability, even if they've lost their license to practice medicine, have a mental health condition, have served jail time, or are currently in jail in another state for providing access to reproductive health and gender affirming care.

In addition, the bill exempts provider information from public records.
Read 7 tweets
Jul 28
A Thread on Body Image, and the Body Positivity Movement. 🧵

1. A tale of two cousins

At five-years-old, I was twice the size of my cousin Tamara, whom you might recognize if a child of the 80's, as Tamara was on contract for Barbie, Disney, Nickelodeon etc., commercials for… https://t.co/mVc5deZvfUtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Image
2. "You're very tall for your age."

Looking back now, I wish I could go back in time and tell my younger self that you're beautiful, you're strong, and exactly the right size.

I never heard that though, and grew up feeling out of place, and very uncomfortable in my own skin.… https://t.co/behkLEQZLBtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…


Image
Image
Image
3. Being "The Change"

In my twenties I began to model, and I began speaking out against the societal constraints placed upon women.

I was going to force change if I had to! I took on a harshness, and the mantra of, "I'm going to make them love me." I was ruthless, whitty but… https://t.co/dWlxmL2odStwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(