This article is really just epistemological warfare. It's based exclusively on the word of one investigator who claims to have mountains of evidence, but provides none.
I have never seen an investigator so hostile to the idea of providing evidence for the claims they make...🧵
I have never seen an investigator so hostile to the idea of providing evidence for the claims they make...🧵
The organization flat out rejects the idea that they should have to provide evidence for anything!
"Am I the one who needs to provide the evidence for the terrorists’ deeds? What kind of travesty is it that they are imposing the burden of proof on me?"
This is insane!
"Am I the one who needs to provide the evidence for the terrorists’ deeds? What kind of travesty is it that they are imposing the burden of proof on me?"
This is insane!
The article talks about video and eyewitness testimony to demonstrate claims, but it's all exclusively from this woman who says it's not her job to collect evidence.
She said collection of evidence is "secondary" and some of the things she's saying may turn out to be false...
She said collection of evidence is "secondary" and some of the things she's saying may turn out to be false...
It's the definition of "source: dude trust me"
She attacks international organizations for not talking about this issue and waiting for actual evidence.
She says that since they're criticizing Israel, they are all antisemitic.
Shez preempting the fact that these orgs will contradict her claims if they seriously investigate.
She says that since they're criticizing Israel, they are all antisemitic.
Shez preempting the fact that these orgs will contradict her claims if they seriously investigate.
This is absolutely unhinged
"There are journalists who contact me and ask: Did it [a particular rape] really happen? It’s like, what are we even talking about?"
She says there's ample evidence but all Haaretz could come up with was an article that doesn't have ANY information on sexual violence.
She says there's ample evidence but all Haaretz could come up with was an article that doesn't have ANY information on sexual violence.
She says she refuses to even estimate a number because there are so many unknowns.
What the fuck does she think human NGOs do if not investigate and estimate???
What the fuck does she think human NGOs do if not investigate and estimate???
The fact that they can't even produce a single victim really seems to give the game away...
And they've framed their outrage and calls for evidence as some sort of feminist project.
How dare you ask for evidence! You're anti woman and antisemitic
And they've framed their outrage and calls for evidence as some sort of feminist project.
How dare you ask for evidence! You're anti woman and antisemitic
An interviewer even asks if her goal is propaganda, but she assured them that it was not.
All good I guess
All good I guess
If credible evidence emerges then I'll obviously revise but as of now, the only evidence of any SA on 10/7 comes exclusively from a few people who claim to have seen something talking to media outlets.
No victim, image or physical evidence has emerged to corroborate these claims
No victim, image or physical evidence has emerged to corroborate these claims
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
