I know it's obvious that Trump changes positions on a dime and how it's mystifying that his cult doesn't care, but picking all this apart is a fool's errand.
They stick with him because he channels their diffuse anger about their lives at other Americans. But it's worse now:
/1
After 2016, Trump voters thought they'd really made their point, pushed back change in America, and gained respect by electing a POTUS.
All that blew up in their faces: They found out they're not a majority, and worse, the disdain of their fellow citizens only intensified. /2
2020 and J6 compounded their sense of humiliation and grievance. The know Trump is making fools of them, but they will never admit it. And Biden winning was like a national slap in the face.
So now they're with him no matter what. They don't care about policy or positions. /3
And this time, they'll support him as he does even more desperate and hideous things. He could call for open borders and free abortions and most of them wouldn't care. All they care about is that he's promising to go after people they hate even more now than in 2016.
/4
Talking about how he and Biden "differ on Issues X/Y/Z" is pointless and a distraction. It's all part of the "normal political horse race" narrative that is blinding people to the danger ahead./5x
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
For years I've watched college kids latch on to one cause after another. Later, they grow up and rethink some of those causes.
This is different: Many are making a decision to become vicious antisemites, as if this is something you can later dismiss as youthful enthusiasm. /1
I knew kids who protested, say, nuclear power 40+ years ago who now, in late middle age, probably agreed with leaders like Obama that maybe nuke plants are okay. So you can walk back your fun stories of getting maced at Seabrook and say, "yeah, maybe I was wrong."
Not this. /2
You march on a campus spewing hatred of Jews, it will change you. And you're going to carry that stain with you for the rest of your life. It's not a youthful dalliance to make common cause with terrorists. It's an ancient hatred that will infest you and try to hold you. /3
A short thread on "The Day After," which I used to teach as part of my Cold War pop culture class.
ABC-TV should have listened more to director Nicholas Meyer, who did as much with it as you could do on American TV at the time and created a landmark national moment. /1
Some of the best moments in the "The Day After" are before the attack. Bibi Besch losing her shit trying to make the beds while her husband (a stoic John Cullum in a great turn) is trying to drag her downstairs to the bunker left a mark on me. /2
But "The Day After" was limited by the nerfing both of its political scenario and its ability to depict horror. The DOD wouldn't work with the movie unless it showed the Soviets shooting first. Meyer didn't want to do that so DOD took a pass. I get Meyer's choice. But. /3
Of course the Soviets were pissed about NATO nukes around them, but that's not what Cuba was about. Cuba had more to do with internal Soviet politics. Khr was trying to reduce the size of the Soviet military; it was eating money K wanted to make good on other promises. /2
What he did with Cuba was kind of a mirror-image of the US strategy of "massive retaliation." He relied on a quick nuke fix to cut costs and then thundered that any US-Sov war would be a global thermonuclear war. This was dumb, but aimed at saving money. /3
I have some advice. I know these are stressful political times, but if you're going to be serious about politics and the threats to democracy, please stop posting about "envelopes of money," and "kompromat" and "payments from Russia" and all that. It's silly and a distraction. /1
Yes, there are corrupt people in politics who take bars of gold and hide them in a closet. But 99.9 percent of terrible political decisions are based on getting reelected. It's that simple. It's not mind control or blackmail or wads of cash. It's about staying in DC. /2
When you post about blackmail or payoffs or "kompromat" - a term I wish most of you had never learned, because you use it so randomly - you're taking attention off the truly dangerous nature of the empty careerism and opportunism that drives these hollow people. /3
Have to disagree with my friend @KoriSchake here. If Trump were still in office, I might agree more. But Milley saying *nothing* would have looked like being squeamish in the face of a direct threat to the Constitution. He didn't name names. He didn't have to. /1
I've been pretty resolute about respecting the office, right down to referring to Trump properly as "the President" while he was in the Oval. But Milley is not required to pretend that nothing happened since 2018. I think he handled it right while in his last hours in uniform. /2
Again, same with Biden: In normal times, might be gauche to refer to what Tuberville is doing at Milley's ceremony. But POTUS can't stand there and pretend that the most unprecedented hold on promotions in U.S. history isn't happening. That's not leadership. /3
I was looking something up in @bterris's book (which you should read), and I recalled the chapters about Matt Schlapp in there. And I wonder if, in their hearts, all of the people who got on Team Trump - including Trump - wish they could go back to 2016 and lose. /1
They could win again, of course. But nothing will be the same - and Trump will likely not bring them back in. He'll choose new cronies. Trump himself will be in a cold sweat every day (as he is now). Republicans will be chained to a sociopath (as they are now). /2
I can't help but wonder if so many of the people who talked to Ben would, in the dark of night, admit that their lives would have been better off in every way if Trump had run and lost, and they could have spent four years chasing after Hillary Clinton. /3