3/ Let's start with Sweden, who accepted the highest number of refugees p/c during the 2015 migrant crisis
As a result, it is now the only European nation experiencing an increase in fatal gun crimes since the turn of the century, with rates 2.5x higher than the European average
4/ An investigation showed that only 15% of gun crime is committed by ethnic Swedes:
🔴Foreign born (41%)
🟤Domestic-born with two foreign parents (35%)
⚫️Domestic-born with one foreign-born parent (9%)
⚪️Domestic-born with domestic-born parents (15%)
7/ Much has been made of Sweden's rape epidemic since 2015. However, a study found that even prior to the 2015 migrant crisis, 60% of rapists were of an immigrant background, with half being born outside of Sweden
14/ A study into crime rates in Finland and Norway found similar trend with Africans and Middle-Eastern migrants committing significantly higher rates than native, Western and some Asian populations.
16/ A Finnish study from 2021 found that in 2020, first generation migrants accounted for 37.5% of rapes and 17.8% of child abusers despite only being 7% of the population.
22/ It’s worth noting that homicides perpetrated by non-White groups are more likely to occur in the street, whereas White homicides tend to be located in domestic settings
27/ Following widespread riots during Halloween the previous year in Austria, refugees were relocated to other accommodation and enrolled in "special value courses." These courses were designed to acquaint migrants with the Austrian "values and norms."
29/ Data from the Interior Ministry in Italy revealed that in the first 6 months of 2018, 32% of criminals were foreign born, despite only accounting for 8% of the population
31/ In Spain, 45.6% of sexual assaults were committed by foreigners in 2021 and 20% of those arrested originate from Africa, despite only representing 2.4% of the population
32/ Whenever anyone makes a claim that "It is simply wrong to link immigration to criminality," show them the data in this thread.
Do not let them get away with such deleterious lies.
33/ Here is a similar thread of mine which challenges the frequently repeated media narrative that immigration is economically beneficial for European nations
Here's a map which shows the contribution of different nationalities in Holland
The Anglosphere (and Nordic nations) outperform everyone else, including the natives
This does not mean Anglos are better than the Dutch, it's just that people who migrate are highly selected
The Japanese are model minorities in Western countries with far lower crime rates than the native population
However the reverse is also true. Due to Japan's immigration policy, a native Japanese person is 11.7x more likely to commit a crime than a North American migrant
1/ Back in 2012, a 7/7 bombings survivor and a man who could trace his British ancestry back to the 14th century was told that he was no longer welcomed in the UK.
This is the strange case of the deportation of Professor John Tulloch
🧵
2/ So why did the Home Office and UK Border Agency (UKBA) seize his passport and are demanded his deportation?
Because he was born in India during the British Empire era, making him a "British subject without citizenship."
3/ Although his father was in India due to his Army duties, Prof Tulloch's birthplace, under new rules, made him ineligible for dual nationality.
After gaining Australian citizenship due to work, he lost his British nationality despite having a British wife and children
2/ The authors gathered information on all the UK grooming gang prosecutions between 1997 and 2017 from over two thousand local and national media reports
But there's a critique; did the media perhaps overlook non-Muslim grooming gang trials?
3/ Now if we consider that group CSE is a serious crime, how likely is it that even local news would not cover non-Muslim grooming gangs?
Take the Rotherham Advertiser's crime section as an example: Top stories include drink-driving, burglaries, and arson.
1/ Someone presented this article to me as evidence that asylum seekers are a net benefit to European economies
Such headlines are common, so I thought I'd examine how they have come to this conclusion
This is a perfect example of how academia and the media lie to you
🧵
2/ The article's author challenges the notion that asylum seekers will be an economic burden, stating many argue without evidence.
They then cite a 2014 Oxford study as their proof.
So let's look at this study >>>
3/ The research opens by telling us how we're facing the most serious refugee crisis in 20 years and aims to dispel five myths pertaining to asylum seekers' economic impact