Lisa Desjardins Profile picture
Dec 5 11 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
OK. I have a lot of reporting on the - what is the right word? - unusual, explosive briefing that just happened in the U.S. Senate on Ukraine and border.

1/
First, the room, briefing. TOP officials. Some of the most important military and diplomatic personnel in the world

Sec of State, Antony Blinken
Secof Defense, Lloyd Austin
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General C.Q. Brown
USAID Deputy Administrator, Isobel Coleman
Then senators of both parties.

Early on, Sen. McConnell tells the group something along lines of "no one supports Ukraine more than me. But we have to talk about the U.S. border."

He turns it over to Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., who makes his best pitch for GOP plan.
Schumer would later say McConnell "hijacked" the meeting.

After Lankford speaks, composed, not tense about the border. Schumer then seemed to feel need to respond to the GOP pitch.

Schumer said, essentially, we are not here to talk about the border. We are here for Ukraine..
Then, several Republicans - including Romney - shouted and stood. Irate at the idea that the border was off the table for discussion/questions.
Sen. Cramer asked Joint Chiefs Chair Brown, essentially "don't you think we need to be doing this to secure the border?"

Brown, answered, essentially and I'm told straight-forwardly that this is not his job.
Then a senator (mixed reporting on who, working on it) asked the Joint Chiefs Chairman: "Have you even been to the border?"

Gen. Brown: I am from Texas.

Senator: But were you born there?
(Brown was born in Texas.)

Among those incensed and shouting was Sen. Lindsey Graham, who at one point, I'm told, shouted something like, "can we fucking get someone in here who knows anything?"
Senators also shouted at Schumer, "ask your mayor!" pointing to migrant issues in NYC.

At one point a senator said to Sec. of State Blinken, "you need to tell this to the President - you need to make him understand" where Republicans are, how furious they are about the border.
(Brown was born in Texas.) Among those incensed and shouting was Sen. Lindsey Graham, who at one point, I'm told, shouted something like, "can we fucking get someone in here who knows anything?"
Senators also shouted at Schumer, "ask your mayor!" pointing to migrant issues in NYC. At one point a senator said to Sec. of State Blinken, "you need to tell this to the President - you need to make him understand" where Republicans are, how furious they are about the border.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lisa Desjardins

Lisa Desjardins Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LisaDNews

Nov 16
Let's break down the House Ethics Committee report on Rep. Santos.
First thing you should know is that this committee is best known for being cautious. And slow. Some would say they pull punches. They rarely - very rarely - issue sharp statements definitively blasting members wholesale.

2/
So the first lines about their findings are like none I have ever seen. The committee found:

"Representative Santos sought to fraudulently exploit every aspect of his House candidacy for his own personal financial profit."

Note: *every aspect*.

3/
Read 9 tweets
Oct 13
Wow. House Dem #2 just called @jim_jordan an “insurrectionist”.

Twice.

Saying he fought a J6 subpoena and pointedly fueled 2020 doubts is one thing but man, saying he wanted to overthrow the government….

Asking what specific evidence and logic they have for this.
Hello all, my sincere thanks for the responses - whatever your reaction, reporters need to listen and know how our words are heard and seen.

We need praise and criticism both. So thank you and I am listening.

To follow up …
A Dem near ldrshp sent this background to my qs re Jordan + “insurrectionist”, citing the J6 cmmttee:

‘The Ohio Republican “participated in numerous post-election meetings” to discuss strategies for overturning the election results, including a Jan. 2, 2021, call with Trump …”
Read 6 tweets
May 29
DEBT DEAL. Let's talk.

It took me some time but let me lay out how this debt deal seems to work - the math.

A bunch of this is *NOT in the bill*.

1/
IN THE BILL:

Defense next yr = $886 B
NonDefense = $704 B.

BUT, NOT IN THE BILL, per sources, there was a handshake agreement that:

Veterans will get $121 B.

That comes out of NonDefense.

2/
So this leads us to:

Defense, 2024 = $886 B
Veterans = $121 B
NonDefense would = $583 B, which would be a sig. cut.

BUT ... there is other money, some in, some outside the bill, say sources familiar ... that adds to NonDefense.

3/
Read 10 tweets
May 28
McCarthy news conf underway. No news yet. McHenry says the deal had substantial shifted the spending curve and they got significant changes on work requirements.
McCarthy says bill will be fewer than 150 pgs. But will be “transformational”.
One big Q.

McHenry said non-defense discretionary FY24 in the bill is at 704 B. And veterans protected. (But need to sort out exactly what that means.)

704B is slightly above FY22 levels - possibly depending on your baseline.
Read 6 tweets
May 9
BREAKING: There is a verdict in the E. Jean Carroll case.

She asked a jury to hold former President Trump liable for rape and defamation.

She charges that he raped her in a department store dressing room in the 90s.
The jury of 6 men and 3 women have been deliberating for *fewer* than 6 hours.
The standard here is a preponderance of evidence.

Did the attorneys for Carroll present a case that made it seem more likely than not that the rape and defamation happened?
Read 5 tweets
Apr 4
The 34 counts.

Going to tweet two ways of understanding them all.

Short summary and then each one separate.

1/
The 34 counts. Simple version.

11 months in 2017 w/ three charges most months:

1. An invoice from Cohen falsely said to be for "legal service"
2. A similar false entry went in the General Ledger
3. A check went to Cohen for a "legal" retainer.

Plus an extra invoice in Feb.
Note: Not all of those elements are present in each calendar months.

But the idea is there are 11 of those payment groups, which prosecutors say were intended as monthly, plus one more invoice at the start.

PS the "General Ledger" seems to be the Trump Organization gen. ledger
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(