Since the “Ancestral Vril” meme is apparently never going away, a quick run-down 🧵 on PornHub: 1/6 – Solomon Friedman is VP of Compliance at Ethical Capital Partners, the fund that purchased PH's parent company in 2023. He is not "the owner" or responsible for its decisions.
2 – ECP is currently chaired by Rocco Meliambro (Italian) and managed by Fady Mansour (Arab). With the possible exception of Shayna Miller (member of the advisory board), Friedman seems to be the only Jew in the fund’s leadership.
3 – Aylo (formerly MindGeek) oversees PH among other popular porn sites like YouPorn and Brazzers. Its leadership has not yet been fully disclosed out of privacy concerns.
4 – Before the acquisition, MindGeek was majority-owned by Bernd Bergmair, an Austrian farmer’s son in his 50s.
Its CEO was Feras Antoon (Syrian), and its COO was David Marmorstein Tassillo (Every Single Time). dossier.at/dossiers/aktue…
5 – PH was founded in 2007 by Stephane Manos, Ouissam Youssef, Feras Antoon, and Matt Keezer, none of whom appear to be Jewish; mostly Greeks and Arabs. dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9…
6 – Fabian Thylmann (German) then purchased PH’s parent firms and created MindGeek. Thylmann most likely is not Jewish, despite how much anon Wiki editors oddly insist that he is... 🤔 (check his page's edit history) archive.is/yXjVs
Overall, PornHub in reality is not "Jewish-owned" or a "Jewish company," and it never has been. People will continue to pretend otherwise, but therein lies an important truth about the meme that Jews run the modern porn industry. Don't get your worldview from memes, folx
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Eduardo Eurnekian is actually of Armenian-Christian descent and a survivor of the Armenian genocide. He affiliated with the Wallenberg Foundation to commemorate righteous Armenians.
But it's too late. The new meme about Milei's Jewish handlers has thus been determined!
This screenshot he provides ofc doesn't refer to Eurnekian as a Jewish-Armenian, but as an Armenian, and Tenenbaum as a Jew; totally flies over Keith's head.
So I tried looking into Keith’s claim that Christian Zionism itself only exists due to Jewish meddling, but there’s seriously zero evidence for it. It’s just tiny bits of speculation connected with pieces of string, the definition of conspiracy theory.
(1/7)
His thread's gist is that the Jews financed notable Bible commentator C Scofield. (That's it.)
The case rests on wealthy Zionist Samuel Untermyer, who’s connected to Scofield based on the following passage. Basically, they both attended the same gentlemen’s club at some point...
In other words it's just the guess of an unknown author who couldn't even spell Untermyer's name correctly. That's the entire body of evidence: Scofield was admitted to some club, and guess who else was at that club (allegedly*)? Samson Undermayor!
These people would genuinely have you believe that Jewish functionaries hate Russia—solely on the basis of historical grievances—and yet support Ukraine, Poland, and fucking Germany to that end.
Just make it make sense.
Not even touching on the secondary assumption that this impulse directs American foreign policy/anti-Russian sentiment. Simply ignore the entirety of the Cold War and instead focus on speculations about so-and-so seeking revenge on Nick II for oppressing his bubbe...
I think this is my third post abt this talking point, it's just at once increasingly popular and incredibly poorly thought out
This new thread is honestly a great example of the widespread confirmation bias on the Right. If you’re only looking for X, you’ll find only X, pin all blame onto only X, and then your applauding midwit followers will eat it up.
I’m blocked but might as well make this a 🧵
One of the authors Keith cites give some crucial context: within the social sciences, of which Boas was obviously a part, the trend was the OPPOSITE and egalitarianism was becoming increasingly pronounced well prior to Boas.
This strongly suggests Boasianism simply pushed the discipline along a path already set for it. But by omitting this context, and omitting any of the numerous non-J actors, Keith is able to advance his thesis: the modern stigma behind race is a Jewish invention.
So wrong... The play was about a Jew marrying a Cossack descendant of the murderers of his own family, and then converting to Christianity. The "melting pot" idea is not about multiculturalism. It's the exact opposite: the melting away of Euro cultural/racial distinctiveness. ... t.co/TUcWTHOxsC
This was specifically for European peoples and wasn't intended for non-whites. Obviously there's no such thing as "ethnically and culturally European," but Zangwill advocated European cultural amalgamation. He also married an ethnically English woman.
This should all be underscored by the fact that Teddy Roosevelt, who opposed both non-white immigration and "hyphenated Americans" or cultural pluralism, was a major fan of the play.