George Monbiot Profile picture
Dec 8 11 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
We should never underestimate the extent to which the BBC changed this country by giving endless airtime to Nigel Farage, other far right extremists and the Tufton Street junktanks, while shutting out progressive voices. 🧵
You might wonder what its game is: after all, they all profess to hate the BBC and want to defund it. But I've seen this organisation change beyond recognition since I stopped working for it, 36 years ago.
It's true that the BBC was never an impartial organisation. It has done the state's bidding, and blacklisted radicals, from the beginning. But it never possessed the self-immolatory character it has now. How did it happen? Appeasement.
I worked at the BBC from 1985-87. Last of the glory years. Yes, it was Establishment, but it also had a bold go-get-'em mentality. That's why Thatcher launched her coup against it, from which the BBC has never recovered. It was turned overnight into a cowering shadow of itself.
Since then, it has grovelled to anyone who has the power to beat it up. Who has that power in spades? The billionaire press. The BBC shifts and shifts and shifts to appease the insane demands of the Mail, Telegraph, Sun etc. But they cannot be appeased. They'll always want more.
So rather than providing a counterweight to the psychopathic, nation-destroying demands of offshore billionaires and their junktank stooges, the BBC amplifies them. But appeasement only makes your opponents stronger.
An important part of the media baron strategy is to persuade their readers that the BBC is a leftwing organisation. Even as it bows to their every demand, even as its panels give more and more airtime to the far right, they insist it's a nest of Trots. And people believe it!
Even if Farage were appointed BBC chair, the message in the papers would be that his job was to "root out leftwing bias". This is what needs to be understood: the billionaire press is *dissatisfied by design*. It will not and cannot be satisfied.
In graphic form: who the journalists booked by Question Time work for. Leftwing bias? My left foot.
No one from @BylineTimes, @openDemocracy and other brilliant new left or leftist outlets. But plenty from the new and old billionaire-funded rightwing outfits.
Sorry, that should have read left-ish, not leftist. Autocorrect can go to hello ...

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with George Monbiot

George Monbiot Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GeorgeMonbiot

Dec 10
1. I’m very grateful for the response to my appearance on Question Time, but also puzzled. I felt that in all cases I was simply stating the bleeding obvious.
Is this now so rare in public life that it becomes an event when someone does it?
The grim truth seems to be: yes. 🧵
2. It seems to me that almost all public discussion in the UK now falls into one of two categories:
A. Deliberate lying, obfuscation or distraction, whose purpose is to disguise plutocratic power, and to present its interests as the interests of all.
3. B. Hedging, hesitancy and circumlocution, whose purpose is to avoid confrontation with plutocratic power.
Read 10 tweets
Dec 4
Wow. There are no trains running south from Bristol. Not their fault - there's flooding. But instead of replacement buses, @GWRHelp has given us taxi chits. Just one problem: hardly any taxi drivers want to do the distance. There's a queue of 1000 people and no movement.
It's as if they've never faced disruptions before.
Even by UK rail standards, this is crazy. People have been standing for hours in the cold.
It all adds to the sense that, as a result of privatisation and austerity, this country is falling apart.
Read 4 tweets
Nov 29
1. This is a thread about waste plant and animal fats, which for 20 years have been promoted as the magic potions that would solve all our transport problems. It doesn’t matter how often this story gets debunked: unlike these commodities, it appears to be endlessly recyclable.
2. In 2004, biodiesel was sold to us, by the EC among others, on the grounds that it could be made from used cooking oil. We could all enjoy guilt-free driving! Yes, it *could* be. But, as I estimated that year, it could supply only 1/380th of demand. monbiot.com/2004/11/23/fee…
3. We were told the same story about biokerosene: also from used cooking oil!
And bioethanol: from crop wastes!
And biomass: from forestry trimmings!
And biogas: from food waste, sewage and slurry!
And livestock feed: from food waste!
Everything could be powered by waste! Image
Read 12 tweets
Nov 27
1. This paper in Nature should spell an end to the nonsense spread by @AllanRSavory et al: that livestock grazing can cause a net removal of greenhouse gases from the atmosphere. It shows that soil carbon cannot compensate for livestock’s own emissions. 🧵nature.com/articles/s4146…
2. It should also spell the end of claims for “climate friendly beef” and of the industry selling carbon credits in ranchland (you might as well buy them from a coal mine). The whole edifice is built on false claims: bullshit in (literally and metaphorically), bullshit out.
3. Aerated (i.e. agri) soils are not reliable carbon stores: you can increase the rate of carbon cycling, but you can't guarantee that it stays there. While good farming practice should be encouraged for many reasons, no carbon credits should be issued for ranch or farm soils.
Read 6 tweets
Nov 24
1. This is the only radiator in our house. We haven't turned it on yet, or used any other heating source. Yet we are always warm. Why? Because this house (which we rent) was built almost to passive house standards. Our bodies/cooking/appliances are sufficient to heat it. 🧵 Image
2. Every new home should be built this way. It’s not rocket science. It just takes a little more care, and strong regulatory standards. Yet the government still allows houses to be built that will need to be extensively refurbished to meet its own environmental targets.
3. Refitting is far more expensive, disruptive and difficult than building homes right in the first place. It's the mother of false economies. Shoddy homes are being built not for our benefit, but to allow the construction industry (a major sources of Tory funds) to cut corners.
Read 5 tweets
Nov 22
1. In this week’s column I rashly attempt to work out how much it would cost to restore a functioning public sector and put the country right. It’s a very rudimentary effort: a proper job would take months and a wide pool of expertise. But ... 🧵
theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
2. On my very rough estimates, to prevent the collapse of public services, buildings and infrastructure and avert state failure, public spending would need to increase by between £65 billion and £100 billion a year for 20 years.
That’s the legacy of 44 years of neoliberalism.
3. Is this achievable? Yes. The column ends with a tentative endorsement of Modern Monetary Theory, which was accidentally tested during the pandemic and found not to be the disaster that some predicted. Never let them tell you there's no money.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(