Contrary to the popular view, significant superiority in the quantity of weaponry does translate into the military victory. The military output delta is a great predictor of whether you win or not, and the longer a war lasts, the better it works
You outproduce -> You win
One major Russian advantage is the sheer quantity of air defence missiles. Countering the enemy airforce & projectiles, air defence systems cover the Russian ground forces from every possible aerial threat. They also allow Russian airforce to bomb Ukrainians without distractions
Now how can Russia produce so much? Let's follow some of the key production operations in the manufacture of S400 missile at the MMZ Avangard. Part of the Almaz Antey corporation, it is a major Russian producer of air defence missiles
1. Casting
Casting = pouring liquid metal into a form (mould/die). This is the cheapest way of mass production by far. It is seldom automated and typically involves a lot of manual operations, like this
Primitive it looks, it is unbeatably cheap & efficient for mass production
2. Pressing/forging
Serves to increase the strength of metal, and/or to give it a desired shape.
Still involves a fair deal of manual work. That is because transition to the computer control affected pressing/forging less. Thus ancient Soviet equipment can work perfectly well
Casting & pressing work great for mass production. There is however a problem. They can seldom produce a component of high precision or convoluted geometry. And that is where you need another metalworking process: machining
What is machining all about? As Michelangelo said:
"The sculpture is already complete within the marble block. I just have to chisel away the superfluous material"
And that is exactly how machining works. You take a workpiece, cut off the excess material -> get a precise part
3. Machining
And that is how machining is being conducted at the Avangard plant. Notice the contrast with the casting/pressing. Fully automated, no manual operations at all. That is because transition to the computer control revolutionized this specific process completely
Machining is how you make a missile (for most part). It is the very high precision machining capacity that determines the Russian ability to outproduce it enemies. And the Avangard Plant's machining base does not include imported machines. It consists of them
Let's consider the Avangard's corporate report for 2012. Why 2012? Well, because it was published in 2013. And starting from 2014 (=Crimea), the plant became very much less transparent. So this is the very, very last glimpse into its high transparency era
That's what they had on balance/in lease in 2012
Full list of machining equipment:
🇨🇭Switzerland: Center lathe machine tool “SCHAUBLIN” model 150A; Universal milling machine tool “SCHAUBLIN” model “53N”; Spark-erosion machine tool “AGIE” model “AGIETRON 370C” [now “GF machining solutions”]
🇩🇪 Germany: universal milling machine “DECKEL” model “FR3”; Five Axis Vertical Milling Machining Center "Spinner U5-620" with CNC "Heidenhain TNC 620+HSCI" panel
🇮🇹 Italy: Flat grinding machine “ROSA” model “RTRC 1200”;
🇪🇸 Spain: Spark-erosion machine tool “ONA” model “KE 500”;
🇺🇸 USA: Coordinate boring machine “SIP” model “MP 3 K” [“Hauser”], coordinate grinding machine “HAUSER” model “S 50 DR”;
Leadership of Western Europe. High capacity, high capability
Learning progress of Taiwan and South Korea. Still limited capability, but already high capacity
Quantitative decline of the USA. Still high capability, but already limited capacity
The absence of Russia-made machining equipment is not very surprising The post-Soviet collapse ruined Russian machine tool production and the technological disruption (transition to computer control) finished it. So starting from 2003, Putin just outsourced the production abroad
What is really interesting, and somewhat unexpected in this list is the brilliant absence of China
There was apparently nothing Chinese at the Avangard Plant in 2012
Nothing at all
Some relevant context:
1. Manufacturing chain: Does China produce everything?
For decades, any resistance to the Reaganomics has been suppressed using the false dichotomy: it is either “capitalism” (= which meant Reaganomics) or socialism, and socialism doesn’t work
Now, as there is the growing feeling that Reaganomics don’t work, the full rehabilitation of socialism looks pretty much inevitable
I find it oddly similar to how it worked in the USSR. For decades, the whole propaganda apparatus had been advancing the false dichotomy: it is either socialism, or capitalism (= meaning robber barons)
Now, as there is a growing feeling that the current model does not work, we must try out capitalism instead. And, as capitalism means robber barons, we must create robber barons
We have to distribute all the large enterprises between the organized crime members. This is the way
Truth is: the words like Rus/Russian had many and many ambiguous and often mutually exclusive meanings, and not only throughout history, but, like, simultaneously.
For example, in the middle ages, the word "Rus" could mean:
1. All the lands that use Church Slavonic in liturgy. That is pretty much everything from what is now Central Russia, to what is now Romania. Wallachians, being the speakers of a Romance language were Orthodox, and used Slavonic in church -> they're a part of Rus, too
2. Some ambiguous, undefined region that encompasses what is now northwest Russia & Ukraine, but does not include lands further east. So, Kiev & Novgorod are a part of Rus, but Vladimir (-> region of Moscow) isn't
These two mutually exclusive notions exist simultaneously
The greatest Western delusion about China is, and always has been, greatly exaggerating the importance of plan. Like, in this case, for example. It sounds as if there is some kind of continuous industrial policy, for decades
1. Mao Zedong dies. His successors be like, wow, he is dead. Now we can build a normal, sane economy. That means, like in the Soviet Union
2. Fuck, we run out of oil. And the entire development plan was based upon an assumption that we have huge deposits of it
3. All the prior plans of development, and all the prior industrial policies go into the trashbin. Because again, they were based upon an assumption that we will be soon exporting more oil than Saudi Arabia, and without that revenue we cannot fund our mega-projects
Yes. Behind all the breaking news about the capture of small villages, we are missing the bigger pattern which is:
The Soviet American war was supposed to be fought to somewhere to the west of Rhine. What you got instead is a Soviet Civil War happening to the east of Dnieper
If you said that the battles of the great European war will not be fought in Dunkirk and La Rochelle, but somewhere in Kupyansk (that is here) and Rabotino, you would have been once put into a psych ward, or, at least, not taken as a serious person
The behemoth military machine had been built, once, for a thunderbolt strike towards the English Channel. Whatever remained from it, is now decimating itself in the useless battles over the useless coal towns of the Donetsk Oblast
Yes, and that is super duper quadruper important to understand
Koreans are poor (don't have an empire) and, therefore, must do productive work to earn their living. So, if the Americans want to learn how to do anything productive they must learn it from Koreans etc
There is this stupid idea that the ultra high level of life and consumption in the United States has something to do with their productivity. That is of course a complete sham. An average American doesn't do anything useful or important to justify (or earn!) his kingly lifestyle
The kingly lifestyle of an average American is not based on his "productivity" (what a BS, lol) but on the global empire Americans are holding currently. Part of the imperial dynamics being, all the actually useful work, all the material production is getting outsourced abroad
Reading Tess of the d'Urbervilles. Set in southwest England, somewhere in the late 1800s. And the first thing you need to know is that Tess is bilingual. He speaks a local dialect she learnt at home, and the standard English she picked at school from a London-trained teacher
So, basically, "normal" language doesn't come out of nowhere. Under the normal conditions, people on the ground speak all the incomprehensible patois, wildly different from each other
"Regular", "correct" English is the creation of state
So, basically, the state chooses a standard (usually, based on one of the dialects), cleanses it a bit, and then shoves down everyone's throats via the standardized education
Purely artificial construct, of a super mega state that really appeared only by the late 1800s