These two things are simultaneously true:
• The richest Americans are the richest in the world
• Food poverty is more severe in America than in any other developed country
To reiterate, a higher percentage of people in America have to skip meals because they don’t have enough money for food, than in not only Britain & France but also Lithuania & Slovenia.
By this measure, extreme poverty is worse in the US than in any of these poorer countries.
But despite such wide disparities in US living standards, a fascinating new study finds that:
• Americans are less supportive of efforts to redistribute income from rich to poor than people in peer countries
• After reading about inequality in the US they become even less keen!
Why?
Could it be that Americans still don’t appreciate the severity of US inequality?
It doesn’t look like it: Americans are more likely to describe their country’s income distribution as "very unfair" than people in any other peer country
But: Americans are by far the least likely to say government should try to narrow the gap between rich and poor, and the most likely to say it’s up to low-income people themselves.
The old "pull yourself up by your bootstraps" philosophy
As it happens, Americans are also the most likely to say that despite the gap between rich and poor being so large, nothing should be done about it 🤷♂️
"Yes some people are very rich and some people are very poor, that’s life", essentially.
And this brings us onto the American dream aspect: more than any other country Americans believe firmly that hard work brings success…
And Americans view themselves as more upwardly mobile than people from other countries, feeling that they will move up the ranks of society in the coming years.
Between this and the "hard work brings success" chart, this is the American Dream distilled in two graphics.
But that’s just perceptions. How about reality?
The US actually has one of the *lowest* rates of social mobility of any developed country.
Both upward mobility and the idea that hard work translates into success are *less true in the US than almost anywhere else*
So, a strong culture of aspiration, meritocracy and individual responsibility. Many would argue these all are positives, and I wouldn’t even disagree.
Britain could certainly do with more aspiration!
And these beliefs surely all play a role in America’s entrepreneurialism and wealth generation.
The US as a whole is very rich. It’s full of innovators, and attracts the best from around the world.
But these strong beliefs in individual responsibility and the accompanying scepticism of government intervention make it easier for inequalities to arise, and much harder to address them.
Americans recognise that inequality is a problem, but consistently reject the solutions.
• Higher taxes on the rich? No thanks.
• Increase the minimum wage? Nah.
• "Inequality is not government’s problem, it’s individuals’ problem"
Now, does all of this mean extreme wealth and extreme poverty have to go hand in hand?
I don’t think so. You can have a society where the rich do very well and the poor still have a good standard of living.
But America is clearly not currently getting that balance right:
In US society, a culture of aspiration and individual responsibility appears to breed apathy towards inequality and especially towards government intervention, leaving the poorest to fend for themselves.
And here’s the ingenious study from @PepperCulpepper and co that found that Americans become *even less supportive of redistribution* after reading about US inequality banklash.bsg.ox.ac.uk/sitefiles/rigg…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
For all the talk of a general fall in births, the drop is overwhelmingly driven by people on the left having fewer kids.
By ceding the topic of family and children to the right, progressives risk ushering in a more conservative world.
There’s something of a paradox at play here.
On the one hand, pro-natalism often implies constraining individual liberty and setting back women’s progress. As such, the left’s aversion to worrying about birth rates is perfectly natural.
But: the consequence of this emerging ideological slant in birth rates is that each successive generation gets nudged rightwards, increasing the likelihood that conservative politicians (who want to constrain individual liberty and set back women’s progress) get elected.
NEW: Is the internet changing our personalities for the worse?
Conscientiousness and extroversion are down, neuroticism up, with young adults leading the charge.
This is a really consequential shift, and there’s a lot going on here, so let’s get into the weeds 🧵
First up, personality analysis can feel vague, and you might well ask why it even matters?
On the first of those, the finding of distinct personality traits is robust. This field of research has been around for decades and holds up pretty well, even across cultures.
On the second, studies consistently find personality shapes life outcomes.
In fact, personality traits — esp conscientiousness and neuroticism — are stronger predictors of career success, divorce and mortality than someone’s socio-economic background or cognitive abilities.
There’s been a lot of discussion lately about rising graduate unemployment.
I dug a little closer and a striking story emerged:
Unemployment is climbing among young graduate *men*, but college-educated young women are generally doing okay.
In fact, young men with a college degree now have the same unemployment rate as young men who didn’t go to college, completely erasing the graduate employment premium.
Whereas a healthy premium remains for young women.
What’s going on?
At first glance, this looks like a case of the growing masses of male computer science graduates being uniquely exposed to the rapid adoption of generative AI in the tech sector, and finding jobs harder to come by than earlier cohorts.
The number of people travelling from Europe to the US in recent weeks has plummeted by as much as 35%, as travellers have cancelled plans in response to Trump’s policies and rhetoric, and horror stories from the border.
Denmark saw one of the steepest declines, in an indication that anger over Trump’s hostility towards Greenland may be contributing to the steep drop-off in visitor numbers.
Corporate quotes are usually pretty dry, but the co-founder of major travel website Kayak wasn’t mincing his words: