This massive Omnibus is extremely eye-opening, and I've only been able to get through 508 sections this far, so buckle up!
1. The DOD has been given "permanent authority" to call up retired members for active duty.
2. Congress and the Secretary of the Interior have authorized amendments to the "Sentinel Landscape Partnership," redefining "agricultural land owner" to "eligible owners" and "land managers."
"Sentinel landscapes are areas where conservation, working lands, and national defense interests converge. They are anchored by at least one high-value military installation or range and contain high priority lands for USDA, DOD, and DOI."
3. Our tax dollars are being used by the DOD to pay the EPA for fines!!!
A new review board shall be constructed not later than two years after enactment to;
"assess the following relating to crypto assets, as determined by the Secretary:
6 (1) The adequacy of reporting obligations and
7 anti-money laundering programs under subsections
8 (g) and (h) of section 5318 of title 31, United States
9 Code, respectively as applied to those institutions.
10 (2) Compliance of those institutions with anti-
11 money laundering and countering the financing of
12 terrorism requirements under subchapter II of chapter
13 53 of title 31, United States Code. "
5. Subtitle K—Combating Cartels on 1 Social Media Act of 2023
6. Sections 501-591 outline recruitment programs beginning in secondary schools, JROTC, etc, relaxing test requirements, retention programs for current members, and prohibitions on the use of gender and pronouns in official correspondence.
Last tweet in thread.
Personal Thoughts:
I'll continue to review and share as I go. This is extremely eye-opening due to the fact that legislative concepts, which appear to fail in Congress, seemingly find their way into ever-increasing Omnibus budgets.
I'm nearly convinced that partisan stalemates are merely media facades, acted out for the public by both parties and both chambers. Meanwhile, the real policies get snuck into massive spending packages that are difficult to tease out and assess.
Regardless, these massive budgets increase the concentrated power of a handful of federal agencies. Many of which create committees that the public will not know about until dealing with the outcomes.
Our government is slowly getting away from us, and the checks and balances created to limit its authority. We no longer read congressional reports. We now read the federal register, e.g., and that speaks volumes to the growth of the administrative state.
We need to return to single issue bills before this authority leakage becomes an irreparable flood of authoritarianism.
Point of clarity - in my first tweet, what I mean is that if this bill should pass as currently written, "The DOD has been given...." In this policy.
In hindsight, I wrongly assumed every reader would know this bill is currently going through Congress.
I apologize for any confusion, but I'm also grateful for this opportunity to learn how to reach broader audiences and craft my threads accordingly.
I'm both delighted and shocked by the amount of traction this policy thread has created. Going forward, I will endeavor to write my posts and choose my words more concisely.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There's a ton of talk and speculation about the "Mandatory Disposal of Bureau of Land Management Land and National Forest Service System Land for Housing," section in the Senate Energy and Commerce provision of the BBB. Sections 30-41
Some have claimed this is a way to reverse the 30x30. Others have erroneously stated it will help expand regenerative farming, while others cry it will destroy habitat.
The truth is that the bill could do all of these things. It really all depends on who happens to be the "Secretary," which means the outcome of this bill depends entirely on future elections.
A bit risky if you ask me. Let's drive in!
Starting with section 30, we find a list of definitions for "covered tracts," and who will be responsible for administering this project.
Secretary means the Secretary of the Department of Interior, Secretary of Agriculture, or under secretaries.
"the Secretary concerned shall give priority consideration to the disposal of tracts of Bureau of Land Management land and National Forest System land that, as determined by the Secretary concerned—
(A) are nominated by States or units of local governments;
(B) are adjacent to existing developed areas;
(C) have access to existing infrastructure;
(D) are suitable for residential housing;
(E) reduce checkerboard land patterns (a goal seen often across the "whole-of-government"); or
(F) are isolated tracts that are inefficient to manage.
Before moving forward, it's important to note that this entire addition from the Senate Energy Committee is all about putting America's land BACK into productive use. This is an attempt to remedy DECADES of radical environmental policies that have locked up lands, only to see them burn—NOT from "climate change," but a lack of management.
Moving along...
Now, here is where we get into ambiguities that will depend upon future elections:
"Housing supply, OR Associated community needs."
Associated community needs is so vague and broad it could literally mean anything. The problem here is that, once again, Congress is punting authority to the unelected bureaucracy to interpret its intent.
This leaves the ENTIRE project open to legal disputes, but so does the right of first refusal.... let me explain
(f) RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL.—The Secretary concerned may provide a State or unit of local government in which a tract of covered Federal land is located a right of first refusal to purchase the applicable tract of covered Federal land for community development purposes.
The problem here is the longstanding history of radical environmental groups suing states the second that states take possession of lands held in trust.
At issue is the private right of action that still exists in the Endangered Species Act. Congress isn't touching that, but is somehow telling the public these lands will be used for housing?
Not so fast says the Centers for Biological Diversity—a group that the ESA literally incentivizes to halt development. The CBD has made millions suing states to prevent profiting off of, or even managing lands held in trust.
Lands held in trust are public lands constitutionally required to make money for education, roads etc. All of which is supposed to offset local property taxes. Instead, this money goes to the far left, and will continue to do so unless Congress addresses the private right of action.
As I reported yesterday, the administrative state has published notice - via the Federal Register - that agencies have zero intent to implement Trump's Executive Orders.
Please share the pre-released Feb. 12, 2025 Unified Agenda with Trump's team ASAP.
@SebGorka @JasonMiller @StephenM
1. Leading up to Biden's Inauguration, over 101 NGOs and 35 senior level WH staff created the Thriving Together Springboard—a cross-section of 78 policy recommendations across the "whole-of-government" for the Green New Deal. 2. On Day 1 of the Biden administration, the U.N.-funded Thriving Together Springboard was implemented through a series of Executive Orders that created new Taskforces/Equity Teams above every Secretary and senior level advisory position in order to dictate how funding would be allocated that Congress appropriated. 3. As Congress approved the ARP, the Inflation Reduction Act, and The Infrastructure and Jobs Act, these administrative agencies allocated every cent through far-left NGOs first, requiring local municipalities to enter into contracts in order to receive federal dollars. 4. The purpose of this "Federal Plan for Equitable Long-Term Recovery and Resilience," was to create SPECIAL DISTRICTS (justified as building resilient to combat the impacts of climate change). 5. The contracts that local municipalities had to agree to (Community Benefit Agreements) subverted local control over land use, water rights, and minerals—centralizing control to the Federal Government. 6. Local governments - that entered into these agreements- no longer have control to even allow residents to rebuild after disasters now. Temporary housing is the only thing permitted as the Long-Term goal is 7. "COMMUNITY-DRIVEN RELOCATION" into 767 new FEMA created census tracts that will require redistricting before the next election.
"The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System shall include special districts as eligible issuers in the Municipal Liquidity Facility program, which was created in response to the COVID-19 emergency to buy municipal securities." Local municipal bonds and charter structures were specifically targeted in this plan implemented throughout the "whole-of-government." 8. This is also where the body of authority that TikTok was banned under (IEEPA) comes into play, as this is asset seizure authority.
Fast-forward to last Monday
Biden's administration began a blitzkrieg of rule changes published to the Federal Register that completely restructured the federal employee org chart—claiming none of these rules apply to the Congressional Review Act as they fall under the exemptions to the CRA (screenshot).
Saturday, Biden's administration releases this document as the Long-Term "Resilient COG Strategy" solidifying the chain of command and the justification—presumably a pre-emptive legal measure against a Trump Administration challenge.
What this ALL boils down to, in my opinion, is a massive CYA attempt at justifying how our money was spent over the last 4 years, the fact that this administration has worked to create new "special districts" (a massive Hatch Act violation) and relocate the American public into resilient cities, then re-order federal employees to shield them from being fired as personnel IS policy.
Basically, they've just made it that much harder to stop this insidious Plan for Equitable Long-Term Recovery and Resilience, which equals the U.N. Sustainable Development Goals, One Health Initiative, and Healthy People 2030 plan as an "interoperable" policy to market shocks. In other words, relocation into the SMART Cities, created on block-chain social credit via the Internet Of Things, and carbon-based taxes for the "well-being economy" via the Internet of Bodies.
You don't have to believe me, just read the federal register to see it's already been implemented through regulatory rule changes.
There are ways to stop this, but it will not be easy!
From Grok:
The Federal Plan for Equitable Long-Term Recovery and Resilience (ELTRR) implemented the policy recommendations from the Thriving Together Springboard through a comprehensive, whole-of-government approach designed to enhance community resilience and well-being across the United States. Here's how the implementation took place:
Adoption of the Vital Conditions Framework:
The ELTRR adopted the Vital Conditions for Health and Well-Being framework from the Thriving Together Springboard. This framework organizes the conditions necessary for thriving into seven categories, which became central to the federal plan's strategy. This approach helped align federal actions across agencies to improve these vital conditions, thereby supporting community resilience and well-being.
Cross-Agency Collaboration:
The plan involved collaboration among over 35 federal departments and agencies, reflecting an interagency effort to implement recommendations. This collaboration was inspired by the Springboard's emphasis on cross-sectoral cooperation. The ELTRR set out to enhance federal services by integrating these recommendations into regular policy, regulation development, program design, and implementation across agencies. This mirrored the Springboard's call for coordinated, community-driven action.
Community Engagement and Empowerment:
The ELTRR aimed to empower communities by fostering environments where they could engage in equitable, self-driven discussions of needs and solutions, a principle directly drawn from the Springboard. This included enhancing community access to federal support and fostering community-centered collaborations, which are key aspects of the Thriving Together ethos.
Specific Policy Recommendations:
The plan included 78 recommendations, organized by the vital conditions from the Springboard, along with cross-cutting actions meant to transform federal service delivery. These recommendations focused on changes to infrastructure that support community-led efforts and whole-person approaches, aligning with the Springboard's practical actions for recovery and resilience.
Focus on Long-Term Resilience and Equity:
Both the Springboard and ELTRR emphasize not just recovery but building long-term resilience and addressing equity. The ELTRR specifically seeks to eliminate disparities by focusing sustained whole-of-government resources on historically marginalized communities, a core aspect of the Springboard's vision for equitable recovery.
Implementation through Existing Authority:
The ELTRR was designed to leverage existing federal authority and resources, much like the Springboard suggested using available tools and resources to pivot towards equity and resilience. This meant integrating the plan's recommendations into steady-state operations without requiring new legislative authority, ensuring immediate actionability.
By adopting these strategies, the Federal Plan for Equitable Long-Term Recovery and Resilience effectively translated the Thriving Together Springboard's recommendations into federal policy, aiming to create systemic changes that promote equitable thriving across American communities.
🚨🚨L.A., like WNC, ARE ONLY THE BEGINNING as The Strategic Plan to Relocate Americans Is NOW FULLY FUNDED - How Cultural Marxism Became Federal Policy
L.A. County was the beta test for U.N. funded policies, implemented in 2021 by the Biden administration, throughout the "whole-of-government."
In early 2020, the L.A. County CEO announced that racism was a public health emergency. In order to eliminate structural and institutional racism, the County implemented the ARDI (Anti-Racism Development Initiative) zoning and planning strategy.
According to the County, this framework would push the envelope on the County's authority, and then "collaborate" with private equity and NGOs to achieve ideological outcomes—leveraging private entities to implement what the County legally could not...
Sound familiar?
"The issue brief to follow is one such effort to broaden the discussion by focusing on private, philanthropic, and nonprofit sector engagement in the relocation of American communities displaced by climate change." - The Atlantic Council Report 2017
Framers proudly boasted that ARDI would guide National best practices as the strategic plan and policy agendas were implemented over time.
Skipping past the bs, the entire plan boils down to city planning, zoning, and building codes.
For anyone living this nightmare, I don't need to explain what this means for you. For everyone else, however, here's what that looks like:
1. Your state is prone to xyz disaster that your local government typically prepares for. Only, post-covid, NO MONEY went back into preparation
2. Once your state inevitably experiences xyz disaster (hurricane, fire, earthquake, geyser, snow storm, tornado, etc), and your home is leveled, and the following takes place:
- You're not allowed to rebuild due to land use restrictions
- You're given the option to live on your property in temporary/mobile housing, OR
- Sell your property to the Federal government - who recently determined appraisals and "fair market" valuations are unnecessary - at which time you'll maybe get a fraction of your home value. 3. While you're confused and distracted, you'll quickly find out that you do not meet the equity requirements for aid, AND while your home no longer exists the Biden administration required your insurance company to add hazard insurance to your mortgage. More pressure to sell... 4. You'll own nothing and be happy, or else... Or else what? Look at the recent mental health policies for institutionalization, Healthy People 2030, or One Health...
Land use is everything, and it's been centralized to the Federal level through contractually obligated County/City-level grants, allocated through the Inflation Reduction Act, the American Rescue Plan, and the Infrastructure and Jobs Act.
The best case scenario is that this plan is dismantled and the NGOs that ended up with trillions going into 2026 can somehow be stopped from relocating affected populations into "resilient cities," AKA SMART CITIES...
However, the trillions allocated to NGOs was done to ensure compliance:
"Such a program could move communities forward in the absence of federal action on climate change by providing the resources to design, develop, and implement a relocation strategy with concrete milestones." atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-resea…
I don't understand why nobody is talking about the policies and rule changes that have been implemented to relocate Americans? It's like everyone is talking around the elephant in the room. Why?
Released Dec. 9, 2024, as people froze in tents
FEMA - "Now more than ever, communities across the nation are making, or have already made, the tough decision to seek higher ground and relocate away from harm’s way. As climate change continues to displace people, FEMA alongside federal partners, strives to assist these communities every step of the way during the implementation of a climate adaptation strategy known as community-driven relocation."
"The report is the first step to establishing comprehensive federal support to communities seeking to move out of harm’s way."
🧵Grok is quite impressive. I've been feeding Grok my policy research on current land use rules for development. After running several tests to make sure the AI is capable of analyzing policies properly, I asked it to generate a map of the United States in the year 2050 using the same legend parameters as an EGIS Map created by Congressional Research in 2004.
🟩 Areas in green light-dark represent Conservation Reserves with limited human use, dark green represents no human use
🟥 Areas in red represent Military Installations
🟧 Areas in orange represent mining contracts and Dept. Of Interior leases for drilling, fracking, wind, and solar.
🟦 Finally, areas in blue represent the Smart Cities for regular/ normal human use.
The documents I've fed into Grok include the following sources, directly from the sources:
🚨🧵Important Thread! NOW, I'll Add Context from Current Policies in order to Concretize the Concept...
Over the last 4 years, under Biden/Harris, a "whole-of-government" approach to running the country has been centralized under the Executive branch of the President. Both the legislative and judicial branches have lost their co-equal authority as power has been unlawfully centralized within the unofficial 4th branch of government- the administrative state.
The risk of the "pendulum swing" today would mean a Trump administration using this centralized authority rather than decentralizing that stolen authority back to the state and local levels.
A prime example of this can see be seen in the policy/rule change notices published this month by the USDA's FNS program. The FNS budget includes WIC, TANF, SNAP - otherwise known as "welfare" - or EBT payments.
Over the last 4 years, Biden/Harris have attached arbitrary metrics and behavioral benchmarks for welfare recipients to keep receiving payments, such as adherence to Title IX, Healthy People 2030, One Health goals and so forth...
The latest public notices seek to "reduce administrative time" by using the A.I Risk Assessment tools of a private corporation out of Silicone Valley. The RA tool would reduce the size of the staff at the FNS, as it would quickly identify "overpayments" and generate letters to prosecute in under 8 minutes-decision letters upon challenge would take 5 minutes- finding of guilt would take 1 minute.
Aside from the public appearance of fiscal responsibility (reducing the size of the administrative state), these actions merely alter bureaucratic authoritarianism to technocratic authoritarianism as these A.I tools combine Medicaid data and "private restricted use data" to create an interoperable smart contract that will determine what people are allowed to buy with their food stamps and public assistance.
One example given relates to insulin use, another relates to tdap vaccines in pregnancy, another objective lists the adult vaccination schedule etc- all of which work towards the Risk Assessment scoring for repayment and disqualification.
It should also be noted that the FY 2025 ICD-10 Codes for billing Medicaid have been updated to support this new interoperable approach to "Healthy People 2030."
In summary, @ConceptualJames is appropriately warning Americans that sizable forces are at work, and a Trump POTUS victory tomorrow will not automatically stop communism. This is an apt warning for Americans to remain vigilant and involved after the election to ensure these forces do not continue advancing authoritarianism through different talking points (such as reducing the size of the administrative state by implementing A.I tools).
The ONLY thing that will actually preserve our freedom in this country is to decentralize authority back to the local level, while rebuilding the clear boundaries that separate the co-equal powers of the federal and state governments.
*All information provided above was sourced from FNS public notices published to the Federal Register. I'll add screenshots of the tiles below.
Beginning on 04/04/2023 Tomeka Owens the SNAP administrator, published a notice of intent to streamline information between SNAP and Medicaid for "identifying and describing systems used by States to determine eligibility and manage SNAP and Medicaid application and recertification information." Etc... federalregister.gov/documents/2023…
On 07/19/2023 another public notice was published for the collection of information on the implementation of A.I. Risk Assessment (RA) tools.
"Data will be collected via a web-based census survey of the 53 SNAP State agencies. Case studies will be completed with six SNAP State agencies; these case studies will include telephone interviews with up to five types of State-level staff and up to two types of local SNAP agency staff (as applicable). The types of State-level staff will include RA tool development leads, SNAP Quality Control Directors, SNAP Quality Assurance Directors, IT systems staff, and data analysis staff. The types of local SNAP agency staff will include local agency supervisors and local agency eligibility staff. The study team will also request administrative data from the SNAP State agencies that use an RA tool."