💥We have new docs showing multiple arms of British military have monitored *domestic* social media under the banner of countering “mis/disinformation”
They even factored the “presentational risk” of “spying” & doing “PSYOPS” in UK - but thought it “unlikely” they’d be found out
For the 1st time, docs show it didn’t only involve the information warfare army unit 77 Brigade, but the RAF!
And that they weren’t only spying for the Cabinet Office but also for DCMS (now @SciTechgovuk) Counter Disinformation Unit - & checking for terms of service violations🙄
Many docs we have relate to the pandemic. Focus areas were public health, public order(…) & the “UK’s reputation” 🙄
They show 77 Brigade did things like take notes on Green MP @CarolineLucas & even BBC Question Time (!)
We’ve been working with the Mail on Sunday to report it
@CarolineLucas It’s unclear what involvement the military has in “counter disinfo” now.
But it is crystal clear that the public, + I think parliament, have been lied to about the role of the military in domestic speech spying/policing. The military has been turned inwards - absurdly dangerous
@CarolineLucas We will publish full documents this week.
Subscribe to be the first to get updates + news on this⬇️
We desperately need support to keep this tough investigation going. If you appreciate this work, please donate what you can 🙏 it all makes a difference!bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/subscribe/
NEW UK “COUNTER DISINFORMATION” DOCS 📁
Thanks to @JHurfurt & @Erl3nd for getting these out today.
Have a look through and let us know what you think…
Our response to Starmer’s bank spying plans in “Fraud, Error and Debt Bill” in full:
I also want to give context & explain why this is *exactly the same* so far as the Tory Govt’s benefits bank spying powers Labour criticised & we defeated just 3m ago🧵bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/bankspying/big…
Labour’s bank spying plan, published today, is set out here:
Everyone wants fraud to be dealt with, and the government already has strong powers to investigate the bank statements of suspects. BUTgov.uk/government/new…
to force banks to constantly spy on benefits recipients without suspicion means that not only millions of disabled people, pensioners and carers could be actively spied on but the *whole population’s bank accounts* are likely to be monitored - for no good reason.
If the history of chaos that threatens democracy teaches us anything, it is to protect our democratic rights with more vigour, not less, when they are under threat.
Criminal activity and inciting violence online should be prosecuted.
But lawful speech should be out of bounds.
No serious anti-racist should accept that misinformation must obviously result in real-world violence, framing it as some kind of natural consequence. It is not.
Had the suspect been Muslim, surely we can agree the racist thuggery that followed would have been just as heinous?
We’ve got documentary evidence that UK MoD 77th Brigade monitored British politicians inc @CarolineLucas & press inc @BBCPolitics under the guise of “countering disinformation” - if they (I kid you not) “questioned government decision making”
Because the British Army previously claimed that the 77th Brigade “do not, and have never, conducted any kind of action against British citizens” and that “all work is internationally focused.”
That was a lie.
Also, following our previous revelations via a 77x whistleblower, ex-Defence Secretary @BWallaceMP claimed the unit only works “against hostile state actors and violent extremist organisations based outside the UK” and that “its role is not to monitor or counter opinion”. 🤔
This is in no small part due to weak, ineffective regulators.
We made a 45pg complaint to @ICOnews with all the ways facial recognition company Facewatch is breaking the law. A year later, they sent a 1pg reply that didn’t address the facts + said they’d take no further action.
Whilst Dutch & Spanish data regulators stopped live facial recognition surveillance like this, under the same law as ours (GDPR), our weak regulator buckled.
Allowing Facewatch (below) to make banners with @ICOnews logo (!) claiming a green light to biometrically scan the public
Parliament’s Economics Affairs Committee analysed CBDCs last year and concluded there was *no case* for a UK CBDC - but serious risks of state surveillance and a “centralised point of failure”.
It has been 1 week since we published the #MinistryOfTruth - it had a spread, column + leader in the UK’s most read paper; 1.4mil people saw the Twitter thread(!); hundreds of thousands are watching reporting/discussion about it online.
Even if they think UK govt depts hosting McCarthyite enclaves of truth admins who collate reports on MPs & academics is A ok, don’t they think there’s a public interest in military power being deployed at our own population online?
I know opinions vary significantly on the quality and politics of disinfo reporting within the BBC…
So if any BBC staff are reading this and want to speak whether confidentially or openly, please get in touch. I’m open to a good faith conversation about what is going on.