Last year, after Elon Musk acquired Twitter, President Biden gave federal agencies the green light to go after him.
And they have.
Today, the FCC adds itself to the growing list of federal agencies engaging in the regulatory harassment of Elon Musk.
I dissent.
President Biden stood at a White House podium & stated that Elon Musk “is worth being looked at.”
When asked "How?", President Biden responded “There’s a lot of ways.”
There certainly are. The DOJ, FAA, FTC, NLRB, SDNY, & FWS have all taken action.
The FCC now joins them.
The FCC's recent decision - like many of the other actions being taken by federal agencies against Musk - fits the Biden Administration’s pattern of regulatory harassment.
It is a decision that cannot be explained by an objective application of law, facts, or policy.
First, the FCC revokes Starlink’s $885 million award by making up an entirely new standard of review that no entity could ever pass and then applying that novel standard to only one entity: Starlink.
The decision does not even grapple with the evidence—it simply ignores it.
Second, rural America ends up paying the highest price for this decision.
Over 642,000 rural homes & businesses would have gained high-speed Internet access for the first time ever under the deal.
But the FCC just vaporized that commitment & replaced it with . . . nothing.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In 2021, the Biden Administration got $42.45 billion from Congress to deploy high-speed Internet to millions of Americans.
Years later, it has not connected even 1 person with those funds. In fact, it now says that no construction projects will even start until 2025 at earliest.
Meanwhile, the Biden Admin has been layering a partisan political agenda on top of this $42.45B program - a liberal wish list that has nothing to do with connecting Americans.
Climate change mandates, tech biases, DEI requirements, favoring government-run networks + more.
It gets worse
While the Biden Admin's $42.45B plan from 2021 has not resulted in even a single shovel's worth of dirt being turned, the government in 2022 revoked an award to Starlink that would have delivered high-speed Internet to 642K rural locations
After being caught allowing personnel in Beijing access to U.S. data, TikTok promised to reform its ways & wall that data off.
But of course, TikTok did not change its ways. As the WSJ found, it kept on sharing sensitive U.S. data with China. Personnel inside China have simply ignored the “Project Texas” promises that TikTok has made to U.S. lawmakers.
Or take TikTok’s decision to enable Beijing-based personnel to spy on Americans.
Initially, TikTok denied the story and claimed that the reporters lacked journalist integrity. But eventually,
TikTok was forced to confess that, yes, it had illicitly surveilled the locations of specific Americans despite its representations to lawmakers.
For years, TikTok represented that none of the sensitive data that it collects on U.S. users is available to personnel inside China.
Then leaked internal materials revealed this to be nothing more than gaslighting.
A deeply reported story broke in 2022 that pulled back the curtain on TikTok’s data flows back into China.
Based on leaked audio from 80 internal TikTok meetings, the report revealed that “Everything is seen in China,” as one TikTok official put it.
And that “everything” is more than just your average cat video.
TikTok collects reams of highly sensitive data on U.S. users, including location data, search and browsing histories, keystroke patterns, and biometric identifiers, including faceprints and voiceprints
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 requires that the government keep this type of data confidential when it is collected by the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission.
But the FCC goes another way—one that violates the Constitution, as courts already found in two prior FCC cases.
This is no benign disclosure regime either.
The evidentiary record makes clear that the FCC has chosen to publish these scorecards for one and only one reason—to ensure that businesses are targeted and pressured into making decisions based on a person’s race and gender.
New analysis here shows that the average #TikTok user is more likely to be exposed to content favorable to the CCP than a user of other major social media
TikTok search results for “PLA” overwhelmingly pro CCP
“Wuhan lab” lacks relevant results on TikTok, suggesting moderation
Leaked documents obtained by a reporter in 2019 showed that "TikTok... instruct[ed] its moderators to censor videos that mention Tiananmen Square, Tibetan independence, or the banned religious group Falun Gong." Those guidelines are no longer in use.
That same year, a search for #hongkong on Twitter returned images of pro-democracy marchers.
Searches on TikTok revealed a different and for the CCP "more politically convenient" version of reality: playful selfies, food photos & barely a hint of unrest.
Today, the FCC takes an unprecedented step to safeguard our networks and strengthen America’s national security.
Our unanimous decision represents the first time in FCC history that we have voted to prohibit the authorization of new equipment based on national security concerns.
I called for the FCC to take this action in 2021 as a necessary means of closing the “Huawei loophole”—a problem where insecure gear could continue to be approved for use in the U.S. by the FCC despite the threat posed to our national security.
Today’s decision by the FCC to deny equipment authorizations involving insecure equipment responds to strong, bipartisan calls for action.