How do you create the sharpest thing in the world? And why would you do it?
In this thread we take a voyage into true sharpness...
We've all at some point wielded something that is truly sharp. You give it respect, because it's dangerous, but it's also magical, a parer of reality. There's a subtle, definite power to a scalpel.
But we can do better than that...
An obsidian blade can be encouraged to chip along the lines of it's own molecular lattice, creating a molecular sharpness down to 3 nanometres thickness that no steel can match. It's delicate, prone to chipping and blunting, but obsidian scalpels exist.
That said, obsidian scalpels are seldom licensed for use on humans because of their delicacy. Nonetheless, their sharpness on a microstructure level shames a steel scalpel.
But we can do better than that...
Introducing the Tungsten Nano-needle: The sharpest thing on the planet. Produced by electrolytic etching, it can get down to tip thickness below a few nanometres (nm): You can fit 1 million nm into a mm, and 25 million nanometres into an inch.
But we can get sharper...
A tungsten wire is placed into a tungsten wire loop in a concentrated potassium hydroxide solution. Electrolytic etching acts most aggressively just beneath the eldctrolyte surface, so a "necking" region develops, eventually splitting the wire in two. The lower half is discarded.
Additional pulse etching is applied to the remaining half: The necked geometry influences electric field concentration and etch rate and a characteristic conical taper is formed. The shape, radius of tip curvature & taper angle is defined by pulse duration, count & voltage.
In 2006, the National Institute for Nanotechnology ' the University of Alberta set an unbeatable record: A tungsten Nano-needle tapering to a tip thickness of just one atom.
The sharpest object in the world.
Why would you do this? Well for one you can use the concentrating effect of nanoneedle geometry as a point electron source for electron microscopes: Literally using something very small to see things that are very small.
But you don't just have to etch nanoneedles: You can also use chemical vapour deposition. This is a far more industrially scalable method for producing lots of them.
Here's CVD grown tungsten oxide nanoneedle in an experimental gas sensor, for example.
You can also use this technique to produce carbon nanotubes: A 1nm wide graphene cylinder. These have remarkable properties: Thermal conductivity exceeding diamond, high surface area for uses as a catalyst and the highest tensile strength of any material.
This barely scrapes the surface, but there you go: The story of the world's sharpest thing, some of the world's smallest structures and a nascent industry of developing materials technology.
I hope you enjoyed this!
Some free downloadable papers used are shown here, showing some different methods of creating carbon & tungsten Nano-needle structures.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It's the defining question of the energy market. Nuclear power is clean, consistent, controllable and low-carbon, but in the West it's become bloody expensive.
Are there construction techniques available to Make Atomics Great Again?
The problem.
Hinkley Point C, the world's most expensive nuclear plant, could hit a cost of £46 billion for 3.2 gigawatts of capacity, which is monstrous. Clearly nuclear needs to be cheaper, and in many places it already is. What are our options?
Steel bricks/ steel-concrete composites.
Construction can be chaos, and it's expensive chaos: Many bodies,many tasks, serious equipment. The more complexity, the greater the chance of delay, and delays during construction are the most expensive sort.
You can't depend on the wind, and you can't sunbathe in the shade, but the sea never stops moving… can we power our civilization with the ocean wave?
The wave power thread!
If not wind, why not waves?
It's a fair question. Wave power is much more predictable than the wind, it's available 90% of the time and has a higher power concentration per square metre of any renewable energy source.
But it's almost unheard of. Why is it so difficult?
Several things are important in wave power: How we collect the energy, how we use that energy to generate power, and how we store, control and deliver it.
We'll start with collection, which is divided into attenuators, point absorbers and terminators…
Industrial chemistry & materials science: What has been and what is coming up…
A quick thread-of-threads for your Saturday!
Firstly…
Jet engine efficiency is linked to the temperature of combustion, and to survive the physical extremes of burning kerosene, the high pressure turbine blades must survive in a furnace beyond imagining, while pulling 20,000 g.
To do this, we must trick metallurgy…
Cheating metallurgy and staying alive in the furnace: The single crystal turbine blade!
This is the last in my series of Generation IV nuclear reactor threads, and for the finale we’ll look at the one everyone leaves out: The weirdo, the maverick…
The Gas-cooled Fast Reactor!
Why is this one ignored?
We’ve covered fast reactors several times and the premise is simple, though hard to explain quickly: A fast neutron spectrum allows fuel breeding from plentiful Uranium 238, plus burn-up of heavy isotopes.
Fast reactors are typically cooled by molten sodium.
What about gas?
A gas coolant has advantages: Compatibility with water gives simple cooling cycles. It doesn't activate radiologically and doesn’t phase change in the core, reducing reactivity swings. It's also optically transparent, improving refuelling & maintenance.
The Yerkes Observatory in Wisconsin holds the world's biggest refracting telescope. Weighing almost 6 tons, with a 40” main lens, it's so well balanced that it can be moved by hand.
Finished in 1897, no bigger one was ever made. What did we do instead?
The telescope thread…
A refracting telescope uses convex lenses to focus light. Shown are the objective lens & eyepiece, with their respective focal distances: The ratio between these focal lens gives the magnification.
This also shows why the image in a simple refraction telescope is upside-down!
A basic (but incomplete) description of refraction is that changes to the local speed of light affects the direction of light waves as they enter & exit a medium like glass or water. A convex lens exploits this.
Different wavelength’s diffraction angles differ slightly though…
This is the NASA Ames low speed wind tunnel, the biggest in the world. It can fit full sized planes and takes up to 104MW of power to run!
But why use a wind tunnel, and what problems do you run into when trying to make it smaller? Let's go deep.
The wind tunnel thread…
Why use one? For one thing, wind tunnels let you measure and visualize the flow field, using smoke, particle image velocimetry or a host of other techniques.
You can also directly measure the forces on your model with a force measuring ‘sting’ as shown.
Strange tunnels:
This is a rolling road tunnel for Formula 1 cars. The road belt needs to have a velocity that matches the airflow, and the force in the wheels needs measuring: This can be with stings on each wheel, or in pressure sensors under the ‘road’.