How do you create the sharpest thing in the world? And why would you do it?
In this thread we take a voyage into true sharpness...
We've all at some point wielded something that is truly sharp. You give it respect, because it's dangerous, but it's also magical, a parer of reality. There's a subtle, definite power to a scalpel.
But we can do better than that...
An obsidian blade can be encouraged to chip along the lines of it's own molecular lattice, creating a molecular sharpness down to 3 nanometres thickness that no steel can match. It's delicate, prone to chipping and blunting, but obsidian scalpels exist.
That said, obsidian scalpels are seldom licensed for use on humans because of their delicacy. Nonetheless, their sharpness on a microstructure level shames a steel scalpel.
But we can do better than that...
Introducing the Tungsten Nano-needle: The sharpest thing on the planet. Produced by electrolytic etching, it can get down to tip thickness below a few nanometres (nm): You can fit 1 million nm into a mm, and 25 million nanometres into an inch.
But we can get sharper...
A tungsten wire is placed into a tungsten wire loop in a concentrated potassium hydroxide solution. Electrolytic etching acts most aggressively just beneath the eldctrolyte surface, so a "necking" region develops, eventually splitting the wire in two. The lower half is discarded.
Additional pulse etching is applied to the remaining half: The necked geometry influences electric field concentration and etch rate and a characteristic conical taper is formed. The shape, radius of tip curvature & taper angle is defined by pulse duration, count & voltage.
In 2006, the National Institute for Nanotechnology ' the University of Alberta set an unbeatable record: A tungsten Nano-needle tapering to a tip thickness of just one atom.
The sharpest object in the world.
Why would you do this? Well for one you can use the concentrating effect of nanoneedle geometry as a point electron source for electron microscopes: Literally using something very small to see things that are very small.
But you don't just have to etch nanoneedles: You can also use chemical vapour deposition. This is a far more industrially scalable method for producing lots of them.
Here's CVD grown tungsten oxide nanoneedle in an experimental gas sensor, for example.
You can also use this technique to produce carbon nanotubes: A 1nm wide graphene cylinder. These have remarkable properties: Thermal conductivity exceeding diamond, high surface area for uses as a catalyst and the highest tensile strength of any material.
This barely scrapes the surface, but there you go: The story of the world's sharpest thing, some of the world's smallest structures and a nascent industry of developing materials technology.
I hope you enjoyed this!
Some free downloadable papers used are shown here, showing some different methods of creating carbon & tungsten Nano-needle structures.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Rotating detonation engines: Riding the shockwave!
A technology that could revolutionise aviation, powering engines with endlessly rotating supersonic shockwaves. It could bring us hypersonic flight, super high efficiency and more.
The detonation engine thread…
Almost all jet engines use deflagration based combustion, not detonation, but while fuel efficiency has been improving for decades, we're well into the phase of decreasing returns and need some game-changing technologies.
One is the rotating detonation engine (RDE).
To understand the appeal of RDEs, you need to know that there are two forms of combustion cycle: Constant pressure, where volume expands with temperature, and constant volume, where pressure goes up instead.
Most jet engines use constant pressure. RDEs use constant volume.
As a new graduate I once had to sit down and draft an engine test program for a subsystem of a new model of Rolls-Royce aero engine. It was illuminating.
So here's a thread on some of the weirder things that this can involve: The jet engine testing thread!
Fan Blade Off!
Easily the most impressive test: A jet engine needs to be able to contain a loose fan blade. In the FBO test, either a full engine or a fan & casing rig in low vacuum is run to full speed, then a blade is pyrotechnically released.
Frozen.
The Manitoba GLACIER site in Northern Canada is home to Rolls-Royce's extreme temperature engine test beds. Not only must these machines be able to start in temperatures where oil turns to syrup, but in-flight ice management is crucial to safe flying.
How can humans realistically travel to another star, and why will it be an all-female crew that does it?
In this thread: Sailing on light, nuclear pulses, using the sun as a telescope and how to travel to another solar system. The interstellar thread!
Slow starts…
The furthest man-made object from Earth, Voyager 1, is one of the fastest. Launched in 1977, it performed gravitational slingshots off Jupiter and Saturn and is heading to interstellar space at 17 kilometres per second.
How long until it reaches another star…?
Um… a long time.
Voyager 1 is moving at 523 million km, or 3.5 AU, per year. Our nearest star from the sun, Alpha Centauri, is 278 THOUSAND AU away. If Voyager 1 was heading that way (which it isn't) it would take almost 80,000 years to get there.
It's the defining question of the energy market. Nuclear power is clean, consistent, controllable and low-carbon, but in the West it's become bloody expensive.
Are there construction techniques available to Make Atomics Great Again?
The problem.
Hinkley Point C, the world's most expensive nuclear plant, could hit a cost of £46 billion for 3.2 gigawatts of capacity, which is monstrous. Clearly nuclear needs to be cheaper, and in many places it already is. What are our options?
Steel bricks/ steel-concrete composites.
Construction can be chaos, and it's expensive chaos: Many bodies,many tasks, serious equipment. The more complexity, the greater the chance of delay, and delays during construction are the most expensive sort.
You can't depend on the wind, and you can't sunbathe in the shade, but the sea never stops moving… can we power our civilization with the ocean wave?
The wave power thread!
If not wind, why not waves?
It's a fair question. Wave power is much more predictable than the wind, it's available 90% of the time and has a higher power concentration per square metre of any renewable energy source.
But it's almost unheard of. Why is it so difficult?
Several things are important in wave power: How we collect the energy, how we use that energy to generate power, and how we store, control and deliver it.
We'll start with collection, which is divided into attenuators, point absorbers and terminators…
Industrial chemistry & materials science: What has been and what is coming up…
A quick thread-of-threads for your Saturday!
Firstly…
Jet engine efficiency is linked to the temperature of combustion, and to survive the physical extremes of burning kerosene, the high pressure turbine blades must survive in a furnace beyond imagining, while pulling 20,000 g.
To do this, we must trick metallurgy…
Cheating metallurgy and staying alive in the furnace: The single crystal turbine blade!