How do you create the sharpest thing in the world? And why would you do it?
In this thread we take a voyage into true sharpness...
We've all at some point wielded something that is truly sharp. You give it respect, because it's dangerous, but it's also magical, a parer of reality. There's a subtle, definite power to a scalpel.
But we can do better than that...
An obsidian blade can be encouraged to chip along the lines of it's own molecular lattice, creating a molecular sharpness down to 3 nanometres thickness that no steel can match. It's delicate, prone to chipping and blunting, but obsidian scalpels exist.
That said, obsidian scalpels are seldom licensed for use on humans because of their delicacy. Nonetheless, their sharpness on a microstructure level shames a steel scalpel.
But we can do better than that...
Introducing the Tungsten Nano-needle: The sharpest thing on the planet. Produced by electrolytic etching, it can get down to tip thickness below a few nanometres (nm): You can fit 1 million nm into a mm, and 25 million nanometres into an inch.
But we can get sharper...
A tungsten wire is placed into a tungsten wire loop in a concentrated potassium hydroxide solution. Electrolytic etching acts most aggressively just beneath the eldctrolyte surface, so a "necking" region develops, eventually splitting the wire in two. The lower half is discarded.
Additional pulse etching is applied to the remaining half: The necked geometry influences electric field concentration and etch rate and a characteristic conical taper is formed. The shape, radius of tip curvature & taper angle is defined by pulse duration, count & voltage.
In 2006, the National Institute for Nanotechnology ' the University of Alberta set an unbeatable record: A tungsten Nano-needle tapering to a tip thickness of just one atom.
The sharpest object in the world.
Why would you do this? Well for one you can use the concentrating effect of nanoneedle geometry as a point electron source for electron microscopes: Literally using something very small to see things that are very small.
But you don't just have to etch nanoneedles: You can also use chemical vapour deposition. This is a far more industrially scalable method for producing lots of them.
Here's CVD grown tungsten oxide nanoneedle in an experimental gas sensor, for example.
You can also use this technique to produce carbon nanotubes: A 1nm wide graphene cylinder. These have remarkable properties: Thermal conductivity exceeding diamond, high surface area for uses as a catalyst and the highest tensile strength of any material.
This barely scrapes the surface, but there you go: The story of the world's sharpest thing, some of the world's smallest structures and a nascent industry of developing materials technology.
I hope you enjoyed this!
Some free downloadable papers used are shown here, showing some different methods of creating carbon & tungsten Nano-needle structures.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
High on a mountain in the Atacama desert, Chile, the European Southern Observatory is building something immense.
It's called the Extremely Large Telescope, and here's a highlight reel of this beast's ultimate capabilities.
With a 39m main mirror it will be, by a long way, the biggest optical & infrared telescope in the world. It will transform study of planets around other stars, distant galaxies, the early universe, dark matter, black holes.
And it's an engineering miracle.
A telescope is limited, among other things, by the light it's main mirror can gather. The ELT will gather 100 million times more light than the human eye.
It will do this with an adaptive array of five mirrors, four of which can adaptively change shape.
Well a number of things, but one of the biggest is that the A330 on the left is mostly Aluminium, whereas the A350 on the right is mostly composite. This matters.
Find out why & how this happens...
In this thread we'll cover Carbon Fibre Reinforced Polymers (CFRP), what they are, what they're good for, how they're made and the increasing automation of CFRP assembly which has reduced costs and scaled-up applications for the aerospace world.
CFRP comprises a 'matrix' (thermoplastic/ epoxy etc) around a mesh of aligned high carbon 'reinforcer' fibers. This gives extremely good tensile strength in a single axis, and resistance to crack propagation perpendicular to the fibers.
As a little treat for us all, here's an appreciation thread for my favourite NASA X Planes.
From rocket powered spaceplanes through lifting bodies, darts, tailless aircraft, the world's fastest to the eerily quiet, here we go...
Starting at the start:
The Bell X1, built in 1945, was a high speed rocket plane that famously was the first to break the sound barrier in level flight in 1947, launched from a B29 and piloted by Chuck Yeager.
He nicknamed the plane Glamorous Glennis for his wife.
The Douglas X3 Stiletto.
Designed to test low aspect ratio wings and Titanium construction in sustained 2000mph flight, the underpowered X3 sadly didn't even manage Mach 1.
But it did validate the theory of intertia coupling...
Why is there a blended fan at the back of that aeroplane?
For fuel efficiency. Let's talk about the Propulsive Fuselage Concept, and wake energy loss...
Some 60%-70% of a commercial aircraft's total drag is viscous skin friction drag, from the creation of a boundary layer & resultant wake. This wake loses kinetic energy to the surrounding air.
Of this viscous drag, about half is from the fuselage, another half from the wings.
Most aircraft engines, for optimal propulsive efficiency, operate in the freestream, away from boundary layer wakes. Because their kinetic energy exchange must balance out aircraft drag, this creates an inverse wake and plenty of wasteful churn.
What is the link between this 90s beast from Russia, and an aerospace technology that is on the cusp of something revolutionary?
The NK93, counter-rotating turbofans, and the COBRA project. A thread.
Unique at the time, the core of the NK93 drove two huge counter-rotating fans through a 30,000hp planetary gearbox. The small core and huge fan stage gave a bypass ratio of 20, making it an 'Ultra High Bypass Ratio' engine.
But it was the contrarotating fans that were special.
The increasing bypass ratio of turbofans is driven by a truism: It's more efficient to accelerate a large volume of air slowly than a small volume quickly. So, bigger fans.
But UHBR fans are limited by geometry. Eventually they can't be any wider, and tip speed is a concern.