You're not gonna like this post, #Fed pundits.
I've seen a lot of arguments the Fed is misleading investors, doing a terrible job of communicating, and that @NewYorkFed President Williams contradicted @federalreserve Chair Jay Powell on rate cuts.
You're wrong.
1/7
Traders and analysts are reacting to what they thought they heard. But they did not listen. 2/7
Powell said rate cuts were not a focus of discussion. Williams said that rate cuts were not a focus of discussion. They both characterized the meeting the exact same way. 3/7
But did rate cuts come up? Yes, both said. But both said only when some individual members of the Open Market Committee presented their SEP forecasts and mentioned the topic. 4/7
There's no contradiction there. Same explanation.
Additional points: Fed officials aren't sent out to "mop up" comments from the Chair. The interviews are scheduled well in advance*. And for Powell & other FOMC members, their comments are a function of what they are asked. 5/7
Bottom line: the Fed has shifted to a peak rate regime. That raises the question of rate cuts. They had to make forecasts and some said 3 in 2024, up from 2 in September. They presented those forecasts. That was the sum of the discussion, say BOTH Powell and Williams. 6/7
You can criticize policy. But listen to what they actually say, not what you think you heard.
*Except for when the Chair wants to send markets a message through the WSJ Fed reporter. 7/7
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The #Fed, a 🧵
According to @Business, Lael Brainard has emerged as a serious candidate for Fed chair. Let’s look at what it could mean (a lot):
1/17
If Powell were selected as chair and Brainard as vice chair for supervision, confirmation would be relatively quick and easy. Both are already governors, both have been confirmed. 2/17
The Banking Committee could dispose of those nominations by the time the Chair’s term ends in February (the vice chair’s position is already vacant).
3/17
THREAD:
For traders excited by the continuing claims decline, a more pessimistic take: 1) Don't forget Pandemic Assistance for gig workers not normally eligible for benefits. Add them to regular initial claims and 3,107,574 people filed last week; 1/5
2) If that many people are still filing 10 weeks into the pandemic, it probably means companies are starting to give up and close permanently. Consequences to come; 2/5
3) Don't forget the Paycheck Protection Program So far, 4,448,533 small businesses have received loans. 75% of a loan must be used to rehire or retain employees. So many people who started getting claims may now be on PPP payrolls, getting paid but not working; 3/5
I’ve covered G7 meetings since 1995. I’ve never seen a country, let alone a G7 member, singled out like this: g7.gc.ca/en/g7-presiden…
—thread—
I asked Secretary Mnuchin his reaction. He told me the US, because of tax cuts, still leads the global economy. But he acknowledged the rest of the G7 may disagree.
In fact, they do. I spoke to the finance ministers from the rest of the G7, many of the central bankers, the EC and Eurogroup representatives, and senior officials from the IMF. Unanimous that the US is mistaken and will pay a big price.