THREAD Washington Post does story with headline, 'Trump quotes Putin condemning American democracy, praises autocrat Orban.' Raises question: OK, what did Trump say? 1/12 washingtonpost.com/elections/2023…
Put aside Orban. After all, the US political system did not convulse for years over Viktor Orban, as it did over Putin. So what did Trump say about Putin? 2/12
First graf of Post story says Trump's words, in campaign speech in New Hampshire, were 'part of an ongoing effort to deflect from his criminal prosecutions and spin alarms about eroding democracy against President Biden.' 3/12
OK, but what did Trump say? No quotes in first, second, or third graf. Fourth graf cites 'experts, historians and political opponents' who have 'voiced growing alarm' about Trump's rhetoric. 4/12
OK, but what did Trump say? Fifth graf quotes professor at Texas A&M who says, 'Putin hates western values like democracy and the rule of law, so does Trump.' 5/12
OK, but what did Trump say? No quotes in sixth graf, but it does note that Putin 'agreed with Trump's own attempts to portray the prosecutions as politically motivated.' 6/12
Finally, in seventh graf, there it is, from WP: ''It shows the rottenness of the American political system, which cannot pretend to teach others about democracy,' Trump quoted Putin saying in the speech. Trump added: 'They're all laughing at us.' 7/12
That was it. And you wonder, was that it? Did Trump say any more? So checking the video, here is more of what Trump said: 8/12
A little context there. Two observations. One, Trump appeared to refer to Putin as an 'adversary.' And two, Trump described a position--that the prosecutions of Trump are politically motivated--that millions of Americans share, all on their own. 9/12
They don't need Vladimir Putin to tell them that. After all, special counsel Jack Smith is taking extraordinary measures, racing to try, convict, and imprison Trump before the 2024 election. Not a surprise that some see that as politically influenced. 10/12
Putin's criticism of the US is in line with Russian/Soviet critiques of the US going back generations. In this case, there is an entirely American debate over the appropriateness of the Trump prosecutions. 11/12
So that is a bit more context for the Washington Post story. By the way, you can buy the reporter's new book, 'Finish What We Started: The MAGA Movement's Ground War to End Democracy,' next April. 12/12 End.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A new study of trans in America. Big majorities have not used hormone treatments, not had surgery. Big majorities prefer *not* to be called 'trans woman' or 'trans man.' (Prefer 'nonbinary' or 'gender non-conforming.') 1/5 washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/a-new-…
Total number: Slightly less than one half of one percent of US population. Of that small number, 70 percent do not present themselves in public as trans all the time. Sometimes do, sometimes don't. 2/5 washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/a-new-…
What to make of it? First the trans industry needs to hit brakes on life-altering, irreversible procedures--surgery, puberty-blocking hormones--on minors. 3/5 washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/a-new-…
Chinese balloon story getting more troubling tonight. WSJ, others reporting that Biden administration now says earlier, Trump-era Chinese balloon incursions happened, but nobody in US government knew about them at the time. 1/4 wsj.com/articles/biden…
Story, as told in WSJ, is that Biden officials 'pieced together' what happened later. So Trump administration veterans are telling truth when they say they never knew of such things, because the Biden team figured it all out later. 2/4 wsj.com/articles/biden…
For that to be true, one has to believe that US government missed these huge balloons over the US. Did that really happen? Seems hard to believe. Or did military spot them but not inform civilian leadership? Seems harder to believe. 3/4
Big news last August when Adam Schiff, Dems asked Intelligence Community for 'damage assessment' of Trump classified documents case. Show the terrible harm Trump has done to national security! So now, months later, has anyone seen the assessment? 1/5 washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/whatev…
Answer: No. 'We have not been briefed,' says House Intel member. 'I'm still waiting,' says Senate intel chair Warner. 'Damage assessment' nowhere to be found. 2/5 washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/whatev…
IC silence leading to theories. 'If there had been something significant it would have been briefed and leaked by now,' said one Hill source. Warner seems to think he's getting the runaround. 3/5 washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/whatev…
Several headlines tonight along lines of 'U.S. May Execute Its First Openly Transgender Woman.' Missouri prisoner was convicted of killing 'former girlfriend.' Journalists straining to avoid saying that killer, Scott McLaughlin, was a man at time of 2003 murder. 1/4
In prison, Scott McLaughlin was mentored by another murderer, James Hicklin, who successfully sued state of Missouri to force it to pay for transgender hormone treatment. James Hicklin now goes by name Jessica. 2/4 apnews.com/article/legal-…
Three years ago, Scott McLaughlin began taxpayer-funded transition. Now goes by name Amber. Among other arguments, last-minute petition for clemency says Scott McLaughlin suffered from gender dysphoria. 3/4
On Republicans joining J6 Committee: One thing McCarthy feared was that committee leadership would keep GOP members in dark about what was going on. So now, look at this episode from @DraperRobert piece in NYT: 1/4 nytimes.com/2022/12/23/mag…
@DraperRobert Late June. Cheney has gotten explosive, revised testimony from Cassidy Hutchinson. Members don't know what is going on. Cheney & Thompson summon them to SCIF for hush-hush meeting on June 28. 2/4 nytimes.com/2022/12/23/mag…
@DraperRobert Cheney & Thompson tell J6 members: We've got something big. There's a hearing in three hours. Here's the script. That afternoon, the show went on. 3/4
Fetterman campaign, many in media, seem to believe Oz made killer gaffe when he said federal government should play no role in abortion. Rather, wanted to see women, doctors, local political leaders involved in democratic process to set policy at state level. 1/5
Democrats pounced. Oz wants to station local politicians in hospital rooms with women making difficult medical decisions! 2/5 washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/whats-…
This is confusing. SCOTUS sent issue of abortion to the states. Someone has to decide what each state's abortion law/policy will be. How can that be done without political leaders? 3/5 washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/whats-…