This Red Sea situation is very very bad. And while the best person to consult is a logistician, I want to take a laymans stab at it.
Currently, container ships are being attacked regularly with anti ship missiles and drones via the Houthi's(Iranian Proxies in Yemen). The USS Carney, an American destroyer, has been in the region responding to attacks and shooting stuff out of the air. They've seen more action on the water in weeks than the entire USN saw on the water during GWOT in 20 years.
This puts the US in a decision dilemma. Our mandate of heaven to justify the unipolar order is based upon the power of the USN to facilitate safe global trade. It's the beating heart of the international westphalian peace, the Pax Americana. The Biden Administration has had a lackluster response, probably due to its State Department being in a love affair with Iran.(In which an underreported Iranian spy ring was uncovered recently that the media is reticent to talk about)
Maersk and other shipping giants were able to flex on the DoD to do something about it. Which is why more USN assets are being diverted to the Red Sea. But this doesn't resolve the strategic problem. What do we do about this?
The US is in what's called a "decision dilemma", or a situation where there isn't a favorable outcome. As Lloyds moves to raise insurance rates on Suez transits (costs that will be passed downstream) or remove insuring these routes altogether (it's pretty expensive to have a cargo ship get hit by a missile) I feel Egypt is a major fulcrum of this problem.
A massive share of Egypts income comes from the Suez Canal. This broke a record in 2022 at 9.4 billion USD, which is almost 30 percent of their annual revenue. If the Suez is closed, they aren't making money.
The Egyptian Government is also stressed from multiple angles. They have a refugee crisis on their border with Sudan, but particularly topical right now is their land border with Gaza. The Rafah Crossing is the only link into Gaza that is not controlled by Israel. Iran having a quarter of the Egyptian economy by the balls unless the US intervenes, means Iran has leverage over what gets into Gaza. If you use your imagination, this could include anything from chemical weapons in Syria, to a dirty bomb or even a nuclear weapon from Iran being not beyond the realm of the possible. This is a nightmare scenario for the US because such an event might force a more tangible military commitment in the region than we already have.
The other alternative is the US military escalating the middle eastern situation by striking Houthi capabilities in Yemen. This is well within the capabilities of the DoD to do fairly easily, and the State Department to handwave fairly easily, as the Houthi's are distinct from the Yemeni Govt that is officially recognized by the west. But it might invite retaliatory attacks on US Navy ships docked at any number of CENTCOM ports. Imagine a flight of drones causing a USS Cole situation in Bahrain or Djibouti.
So that seems to be the decision dilemma. If we do nothing, Egypt faces economic instability, which impacts the crossing into Gaza, the US appears unable to keep the trade lanes safe, and eventually a ship is going to sink.
But if we retaliate, we are escalating the situation into one which invites retaliatory strikes of a greater intensity. One which demands further military commitments and puts the Biden Administration in a very tough spot considering the current bottom-up pro Palestine and top-down pro Israel situation here at home that they've been straddling the fence on, right as an election year starts up.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There is something bizarre going on that I can't quite put my finger on, but it can be seen in the replies to this guys post. This guy has been poking around in DMs and replies of lots of RW twitter constantly asking for followbacks.
As I alluded to in another thread, there is something strange going on. Weird influencer accounts in "MAGAville" that have followings relative to exposure that make very little sense.
Couple that with what I saw earlier, why are large "normie" themed MAGA accounts creating "twin brothers" that they are boosting? These accounts are obviously not being accused of impersonation, they are sanctioned, because the "brothers" are mutuals.
Are they using their platforms to boost and create high follower alts to sell? What I have heard goes on is that people will create accounts and use this followback strategy until they reach a certain size, unfollow everyone they follow, change to a blank slate name and PFP, and then sell off the account. People buy these blank slate, high follower count accounts in order to immediately jump into things like monetization and begin to engagement bait.
But there is a certain and very similar "vibe" to all the accounts here. They are all congratulating Dustin here, but despite their followings only getting double digit views and 1 or no likes for the most part. Though there are a few accounts in the replies I know are organic.
Additionally, this huge "knot" of accounts retweet each other constantly, but there is very little actual engagement in their posts compared to a typical 50k+ follower account.
I think the reality of what this guy is talking about is that antipathy towards blacks *from* most whites in this era was more or less gone. That doesn't mean it was reciprocated the other way.
These men are models of what we wanted blacks to be like, not how most of them actually are. Most racial discourse in the US amounts to white people wishing black people would stop doing hood rat shit all the time.
The left thinks this is because they're poor, or grow up without enough government services, which wouldn't explain the fact that poor whites of the same income bracket as poor blacks don't commit nearly as many crimes despite there being way more of them than blacks.
So when libs worship them like cows in India, what they're really saying is "Please see the light and act civilized we will do literally anything other than face the truth of the matter!"
And the traditional white conservative position essentially hinges on the police handling the problem and just throwing them in jail when they break the law while still more or less ignoring the racial element as best as they can.
The only thing that (privately) your average white american on the left or right would agree on if they took a moment to be intellectually honest is that they don't like most of the stereotypical "black" things that exist.
From stochastic irrational violent crime like Karmelo Anthony stabbing a kid for telling him he wasn't where he was supposed to be to black women being rude and disagreeable, whites really hate this shit and wish blacks would just act like Bill Cosby or Will Smith.
The real crime is that they taught an entire generation of white kids to treat blacks like they *were* Bill Cosby and Will Smith, when they are actually models of what white people wish black people were actually like.
The problem is that when anyone tries to confront this problem, the top 20-25 percentile of black america gets held up as an example that stereotyping is wrong and they aren't all like that. This is really just copium to the tune of "But they can change! Look at my black friend who went to college and has a mortgage and a family!"
And good for them, but there's a reason the first thing black people with the ambition for upward mobility do is move away from all the other black people. The problem is that an entire generation was shown an aspirational version of black people and told "See? They're just like you and me!" while most of the black community hadn't changed at all.
So racism wasn't gone, white kids were just shown black people as we wish they were and nobody gave us the memo that this wasn't really true if you lived in a major city. I'm sure all these dudes live in neighborhoods that are majority white.
I had the viewpoint of the OP when I was younger, because there weren't really very many black people where I grew up. So my opinion was largely based on what I saw on TV or online.
But I've been stationed in Biloxi MS.. I've lived in Houston for 10 years now.. Not reality.
That's the other thing.. The Japanese in california had a generation where they were poor, new to the US, and picked our fruit. Next generation they took over landscaping across the state, all gardeners were japanese.
The ironic part is every Indian I've ever talked to on a positive basis generally agrees with me on this. This article is a pretty fascinating inside look, from an Indian who came to the west and had to "un-learn" a lot of things. Eye-opening.
Relevant story from a political event in TX I attended a few years ago juxtaposed with a meeting I was at last night: 🦣
I have a friend who is a really solid political organizer in Houston, knows all the ground game and does amazing work, normie gen X dad guy who really puts in the work. He taught me a ton about how local and municipal elections work, because of him I worked on several local campaigns. Good teacher.
But he had me come to an event with him, and there was this old guy who has been a Texas GOP employee for a long time. My friend introduces me to this boomer guy who he states is pivoting to manage the state parties efforts to recruit the youth at the high school level. This guy is like 65 years old at the time, this was maybe 3 years ago, he chairs several GOP committees both at the county and state level here in Houston.
So friend introduces me to him as one of his locals who is very sharp and understands the younger perspective etc etc and leaves us to talk. I sort of throw a softball with an opinion on how the younger generation are polarized extremes, if they have any interest in politics it's to the far end of the right or the left.
He immediately disagrees with me and says "I think one of the problems with our efforts to recruit in high school is that all this Trump MAGA stuff is too extreme, if we want to get them interested we need to be more moderate."
Gave him a sneer and shook my head in disgust and did an about face to go grab a beer at the bar. Knew with an opinion like that he was beyond help.
I was at a meeting last night talking about this exact same problem, and we've essentially abandoned getting any assistance from the state party whatsoever and are working with a TPUSA field director who is a lot more accomodating. I spent many years not liking TPUSA and Kirk, but they've been improving over the last few years, slowly but surely.
Also, during this meeting one of the local hardcore grandma volunteers that I frequently have friction with, she takes the mic and talks about how polarized by gender Gen Z is (she's right ofc) but then says we need to direct more resources at the high school level to try and get girls interested.
I took the mic to respond to her and said it was a waste of time to dedicate too many resources to bringing young women on board. If a zoomer girl isn't already down with the right because of her own convictions or religion or worldview, she's basically gonna be a lefty forever until she gets hitched and has kids and may cross the picket line then, and that a full court press on young men that ensures they are energized enough to show up and vote and make their friends vote makes more sense.
When I reminded my friend of my interaction with the old GOP guy a few years ago he said "He's more GOP than MAGA, but that's a dying breed with no future."
Personally, I think *high school* outreach is a waste of time. College is a lot more fruitful, high school kids have way too much going on, both IRL and in their own heads, to start thinking of politics in any non-emotive way. It's just going to kind of attract the lame sheltered religious kids (who are good kids) but were already onboarded aggressively by their parents anyway.
But at the end of the day my political relationship to the boomers of the GOP has always been that they alienate anyone to the right of them, which is everyone younger than them on the right just about, and then wonder why they aren't "making inroads with the youf"
I've studied the negligible impacts of govt incentive structuring in Hungary and Japan, which has *some* impact, but not much
I'm convinced the only way to fix this is to get women to stop going to college, or to give men extreme preference in the most lucrative jobs at *scale*.
Sweeping away bullshit govt and NGO jobs by downsizing or taking govt grant money away is going to cause a lot of extreme selection pressure on women who work and have a degree.
There's gonna be more competition for those jobs but hopefully a lot of women decide to just dip out.
I'm going to be watching President Trump address congress shortly, I'll put any relevant things I hear in this thread, in case anyone can't/doesn't want to sit through it:
🧵
Big standing ovation as Trump enters, lasted a long time
Trump just sort of inferred for everyone to give Melania applause too and they did
Starts off "To my fellow citizens, America is back"
Chants of USA USA
Proclaims ushering in of a golden age for America, says we've accomplished more in 43 days than most do in 4 years and just getting started