The Colorado Supreme Court has issued an unsigned opinion disqualifying Trump from the ballot: "The sum of these parts is this: President Trump is disqualified from holding the office of President under Section Three; because he is disqualified."...courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file…
...This ends a string of losses for advocates of this dangerous novel theory. They finally found a court that would embrace what the court admits is a case of "first impression." My first impression remains that same. The court is dead wrong in my view...jonathanturley.org/2023/08/21/the…
...It is striking that the court relies on Schenck v. U.S., where the Court upheld the denial of core free speech rights of a socialist opposing a war. The opinion of the Colorado Supreme Court is so sweeping that it would allow for tit-for-tat removals of candidates from ballots
...The opinion is remarkable in how the four justices adopted the most sweeping interpretations to get over each barrier. The result is lack of a limiting principle. I view the opinion as strikingly anti-democratic in what it now allows states to do in blue and red states alike.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Rep. Onder just body slammed Smith on his effort to give Trump's legal team little time to read millions of pages of documents. Smith's response was that he wanted to be sure that Trump got a speedy trial, even though the Trump team was trying to slow down the trial to review his document dump...
...It was a strikingly dishonest moment from Smith, who was clearly pushing for a trial before the election in the view of many of us. Smith insisted that the speedy trial is a public right, but it is not a right that has seemed to motivate him in the past in seeking such a rushed schedule...
...Smith also sought to curtail Trump's usual right to appeal in this mad rush...
The hearing has started with Jack Smith in the Judiciary Committee...
...Smith is giving his opening statement. He stated that he did not consider the upcoming election in his actions. That is hard to square with the extraordinary efforts before the election by Smith, including filings clearly designed to impact voters in the view of many of us...
...It also involved irregular efforts to prosecute Trump before the election, including calling for skipping standard appeals that he might take...
After taking control of the Virginia government, Democrats unleashed a torrent of new tax proposals and other controversial measures. It is becoming a fringe frenzy, including a bill that would make it more difficult to find federal fraud by nonprofits...foxbusiness.com/politics/somal…
...With billions being investigated for fraud, Virginia Del. Jessica Anderson is pushing HB 1369 bar agencies from requiring recipients to supply federal eligibility information for funds. It appears part of a new state motto: Virginia is for Defrauders. lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/2…
...Here is the operative language: "No state agency responsible for the administration of federal funds shall impose a requirement on a nonprofit charitable organization providing a federal public benefit to determine, verify, or otherwise require proof of eligibility of any applicant for such benefits."
Don Lemon did his best to perfect the case against the protesters in the Minneapolis Church as targeting the congregants over their faith. In what sounds like a pitch for prosecution under the FACE Act, Lemon zeroed in on the religious values of the congregants in a new tirade...
...The former CNN host dismissed criticism for storming a church gathering, explaining "I think people who are, you know, in the religious groups like that, it's not the type of Christianity that I practice, but I think that they're entitled, and that entitlement comes from a supremacy, a White supremacy"...
...This follows organizer Nekima Levy Armstrong, who leads the local Racial Justice Network, is declaring that the churchgoers "need to check their theology and the need to check their hearts.”...
We are 15 minutes away from the oral argument in Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J. I will be on X and Fox News with the coverage...
...Notably, Lindsay Hecox does not want the Court to hear her case. This may reflect the fact that the Court is likely to not just rule against the claims under the Equal Protection Clause but establish historic new precedent... supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/2…
...I will be listening with most interest to Justice Gorsuch who wrote the majority opinion in 2020 in Bostock v. Clayton County, ruling that federal employment discrimination laws protect gay and transgender employees. He was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan. He treated the transgender status as employment discrimination “because of sex.”...
The criminal investigation of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell raises legitimate concerns over retaliation. There was no referral from Congress (as is usually the case in alleged false statements in hearings). There are equally legitimate concerns over the soaring costs, but that is hardly unknown in Washington...
...President Trump has insisted that he did not order the criminal investigation, but the concern is that this is a Becket-like circumstance where associates respond to the implied question of "who will rid me of this meddlesome fed?'
...The most credible cases are referrals not from individual members but from a Committee and supported by the House...