Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 Profile picture
Dec 21 3 tweets 2 min read Read on X
More action on the docket for Whitmer fednapping appeal. Last week, DOJ finally filed its brief detailing opposition to overturn convictions of Barry Croft and Adam Fox after retrial on federal terror charges.

Croft and Fox alleged judicial misconduct in the handling of both federal trials. DOJ asking for oral arguments; no date set as of yet.

Of the many scandals related to this case, one involves the recusal of Mark Totten, the current US Attorney for Western Michigan.

He removed himself from the prosecution team but did not explain why--but it's safe to assume his role as Whitmer's general counsel as the FBI kept Whitmer and her aides apprised of the entrapment scheme during 2020 has something to do with it.Image
Joshua Blanchard, Barry Croft's public defender, filed a lawsuit in June 2022 against DOJ seeking info about Totten's recusal. DOJ is still fighting the lawsuit and refusing to produce any records.

Maybe @JudiciaryGOP can help here? Image
Splitting hairs--DOJ doesn't say if a memo exists only that "documentation" exists.

Then admits government is withholding it.

If a sitting US Attorney was involved in entrapping citizens, we deserve to know. And if so, he should be removed from office. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @julie_kelly2

Dec 21
NEW: Jack Smith files response to Trump’s reply to DOJ petition for SCOTUS to expedite consideration of presidential immunity matter.

Smith getting closer to admitting Biden regime wants this trial over and done before Election Day
Image
Image
Some disputed my earlier reporting that due to immunity appeal, all pretrial proceedings were on hold.

Jack Smith just admitted as much Image
Truly outrageous for a largely failed former prosecutor with zero accountability overturned by SCOTUS in a key political prosecution argues Trump should be denied normal due process rights so Smith can try to win another rigged case for Democrats.

Defund then investigate @JudiciaryGOPImage
Read 4 tweets
Dec 21
Court filings coming fast and furious this week but this is a stunner.

Former AG Edwin Meese asks SCOTUS to deny Jack Smith's petition to expedite appeal of immunity ruling, argues Merrick Garland broke the law by appointing a special counsel w/o statutory authority:
Image
Image
While noting other special counsels have been US Attorneys, Meese's amici curiae petition (meaning doesn't side with either party) underscores how Smith's appointment is unlawful.Image
Which brings to mind this clip...
Read 4 tweets
Dec 13
NEW: Donald Trump just filed response to Jack Smith's demand to expedite appeal of Judge Chutkan's presidential immunity order at DC appellate court. This is separate from response due next week related to similar request before SCOTUS:Image
"This appeal presents novel, complex, and sensitive questions of profound importance. Whether a President of the United States may be criminally prosecuted for his official acts as President goes to the core of our system of separated powers and will stand among the most consequential questions ever decided by this Court. The manifest public interest lies in the Court’s careful and deliberate consideration of these momentous issues with the utmost care and diligence."

The 3-judge panel at appellate court that will first decide the appeal includes 2 Biden appointees and one Bush appointee (all women)
Discovery so far, Trump's lawyers wrote, is "equivalent to the Washington Monument, stacked on top of itself eight times, with nearly a million pages to spare.”

DOJ, per usual, foot-dragging discovery. Judge Cannon in classified docs case scolded DOJ numerous times for not fulfilling discovery obligations/deadlines.

Judge Chutkan turns a blind eye.

In fact, one of my favorite Chutkan moments was when Trump's defense attorneys during a hearing in late August complained about the voluminous amount of discovery involved in the case--Chutkan replied that they should have been collecting evidence for the past year bc they "knew" the indictment was coming.Image
Read 5 tweets
Dec 10
New: Last night, Jack Smith filed a motion objecting to Trump's demands for vast amounts of evidence from various agencies including DHS and J6 committee.

I will post some highlights...

It appears DOJ is part of the scandal of the missing Secret Service texts. As I reported a few days ago, thousands of texts between 2 dozen Secret Service officials/agents including the director and Robert Engel--the agent Trump allegedly attacked on J6 according to Cassidy Hutchinson--were deleted at the end of Jan 2021.

USSS claimed the purge was caused by a pre-planned reset of devices--and it happened after House Dems notified exec branch to preserve records related to Jan 6.

J6 committee subpoenaed the texts only to be told they were not recoverable. Now it looks like DOJ had actual phones but still could not find the deleted messages?

This is insane--no one can possibly believe this given the invasive tools the govt has and has used in this investigation.

This is in addition to Biden's DHS refusing to give House GOP numerous transcribed interviews with Secret Service officials--also apparently the one with Engel.



WHAT IS THE SECRET SERVICE HIDING?
Image
Well, this is some stunning logic right here.

Law enforcement and those officials duty-bound to secure the Capitol (Sergeant-at-arms for Pelosi and McConnell to name a few) are not to blame for what happened but Donald Trump--who is not responsible--is? Image
DOJ continues to conceal info related to extensive use of undercover police from numerous agencies and deployment of FBI informants before and on Jan 6.

Defendants cannot get access to this crucial evidence (see @FreeStateWill) as govt refuses to account for these assets. Image
Read 4 tweets
Dec 8
Reading now DC appellate court ruling that mostly upholds gag order on Trump.

One thing is very clear: This panel strongly refuted the media's description of the order as "narrow."

"The district court’s order, however, sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary."
Image
On balance--while the Dem judges certainly take their shots at Trump--the decision is a defeat for Judge Chutkan and Jack Smith in particular.

As far as public statements re potential witnesses--Chutkan prohibited all comments on those individuals including former WH officials.

"The district court’s ban on speech that 'targets' witnesses and trial personnel reaches too far. The ordinary meaning of statements that 'target' a person is statements aimed at or directed toward a person or entity."

This ruling narrows the scope to include statements "concerning their potential participation in the investigation or in this criminal proceeding."

Noting that potential witnesses including individuals who speak critically of Trump (Bill Barr, Mark Milley, Mike Pence), the judges argue Trump has a right to fight back as long as it doesn't pertain to the trial.

"Mr. Trump has a First Amendment interest in publicly debating those individuals’ commentaries in a way that is independent of and disassociated from any role they might have in the trial. Yet the Order would proscribe such speech because it would speak about someone who is a reasonably foreseeable witness, even if Mr. Trump’s speech would have nothing to do with their witness role or the possible content of any testimony."
OMG LOL this is so embarrassing for Jack Smith.

Recall--Smith is the one who asked for a gag order prohibiting Trump from posting mean things about him.

3 Dem judges basically said: put your big boy pants on

Image
Image
Read 4 tweets
Dec 5
New: Jack Smith just filed a motion describing the evidence he plans to use in Trump's J6 trial in DC.

It's like reading the J6 Committee TV script:

* Historical Evidence of the Defendant’s Consistent Plan of Baselessly Claiming Election Fraud

* Historical Evidence of the Defendant’s Common Plan to Refuse to Commit to a Peaceful Transition of Power

* Evidence of the Defendant and Co-Conspirators’ Knowledge of the Unfavorable Election Results and Motive and Intent to Subvert Them

* Pre- and Post-Conspiracy Evidence That the Defendant and Co-Conspirators Suppressed Proof Their Fraud Claims Were False and Retaliated Against Officials Who Undermined Their Criminal Plans

* Pre- and Post-Conspiracy Evidence of the Defendant’s Public Attacks on Individuals, Encouragement of Violence, and Knowledge of the Foreseeable Consequences

* Post-Conspiracy Evidence of the Defendant’s Steadfast Support and Endorsement of Rioters
The motion is stunning in its level of sophistry, demagoguery, and hypocrisy.

The same DOJ that concocted the Trump-Russia election collusion hoax in 2016 to derail his candidacy/presidency now claims Trump tried to undermine the transition of power that year.
Image
Smith cites Trump's recent comments about excessive sentences for Proud Boys and promises to pardon J6ers as evidence he supported the "riot."

Smith will use proposed pardon to impeach credibility of defense witnesses, esp anyone tied to Jan 6. Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(