I know this sounds dramatic, but we hold copies of a "confidential" plan run by the Tory attack agency Topham Guerin to pay influencers to attack @GoodLawProject over the Christmas period.
Topham Guerin's client, on this occasion, is Palantir. Influencers are asked what their “fee expectations” are for agreeing to send two tweets, one a video and the other a follow-up written tweet about Good Law Project.
Those who accept the offer – which bears the branding of Topham Guerin – are told they must “keep the brand confidential and not tag Palantir”. The briefing document is clear that Good Law Project is the only target. And the content must "go live before the New Year."
Lots of questions arise including how many of the bad faith attacks on our work are secretly paid for by Topham Guerin or other Tory attack agencies. And why, if Palantir's operations are above board, it demands secrecy from those it pays.
Leaked emails reveal that the tech giant Palantir has hired Topham Guerin to pay influencers to attack Good Law Project on social media – but the source of the money is to be kept ‘confidential’. goodlaw.social/r4uz
I know it's very fashionable amongst certain, usually very privileged, commentators to sneer at @GoodLawProject. But whilst they sneer from the sidelines, here is some of the work we have done this year. THREAD
We funded a case that established – and campaigned for – a new defence for women sued for defamation by men who sexually assaulted them. goodlawproject.org/update/win-nin…
We forced the Tufton Street climate change denier Global Warming Policy Foundation to refer itself to the Charity Commission... goodlawproject.org/update/global-…
(1) Why did we buy five years supply at 500% of pre pandemic prices. (2) Why were VIPs, selected by Tory Ministers, fourteen times more likely to win a PPE contract?
(3) Why did VIPs get paid 80% more than average? (4) Why did we buy from so many brand new, uncapitalized, companies with no experience of supplying PPE? (5) Why did we ignore offers from huge, established PPE suppliers who knew what they were doing, like Arco?
(6) Why, of the £12.5bn we spent buying PPE, did DHSC's own statutory accounts record that over £10bn was wasted? (7) Why did civil servants feel worried about what would happen if they did not buy from friends of Ministers?
So, we have sent a formal letter before action to Rishi Sunak threatening to challenge his unilateral decision to ignore what Parliament has enacted about HS2, cancel the project, and salt the earth by selling all the land. 🧵
We haven't yet formed a view about whether we will sue - we want to know whether affected Mayors and MPs are serious about their opposition - and although our lawyers reckon its a runner we also wanna know what his lawyers say - and we don't yet have their *full* response.
I emphasise the word *full* because we did receive this response from them. It asks us to sue Mark Harper instead of Rishi Sunak because "the Prime Minister was not the decision maker in this matter."
It should surprise no one that Sir John Hayes MP of the misnamed Commonsense Group has been hopelessly misled by his own Solicitor General. 🧵
Even from a quick glance we can see that the total costs Central Government has paid us when Good Law Project has been Claimant are far more than the figure of £63,738.71 given by the Solicitor General Michael Tomlinson.
In this case (from 2021) Government paid us costs of £85,000 and in this case (from 2022) Government paid us costs of £35,926. Each of those numbers seems to have just been ignored by the Solicitor General.
Brianna Ghey's killers exchanged transphobic slurs. This followed after, in the weeks leading up to her killing, an average of 38 articles a day about trans people, the vast majority with negative framing. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan…
If the loathing of trans people that is commonplace in our media were instead directed at Jewish people editors would (rightly) he sacked, in prison, or both. And I can't see any logical justification for the difference in treatment.
Dominic Cummings - the man who brought you Brexit and was organ grinder to Johnson's monkey - has (heroically, given the evidence) written the witness statement you would expect: everyone is stupid, all systems are buggered, if only people had followed his instructions...
It's also as slippery as you might expect from the man who suggested leaving the EU would mean the NHS got an extra £350m a week. But let me pick up (for now) on one point.
He says that in April 2020 officials had been told to demand discounts on PPE and this contributed to PPE being "in a terrible state".