Black people on average spend 30% more on luxury goods and brands than White people in the same income group. Why? Because wearing designer and luxury brands is necessary for affluent Blacks to gain respect and status in the White world🧵
According to an Ipsos study, Affluent Blacks use clothes as a “readily processed indicator of class outweighing race.” The point of designer brands is beyond the clothes. The clothes are used to get the respect that is only conditionally granted by the White-dominated society.
Wharton Professor Nikolai Roussanov said,“If you’re a middle-class Black, it seems like in order to be perceived by Whites and other blacks as relatively well off, you have to show you have money. You have to spend more on things that are observable.”
The poor, Black and White, spend more on visible goods if they live in poor communities, because it gives them more relative status. But those living among wealthier people don't spend extra on visible expenditures, since they are too far behind to get more status from it.
According to a Wharton study, Blacks and Whites appear to have different spending habits only because Blacks tend to be concentrated in poor communities more than Whites.
In all races, people of a given income become less and less likely to emphasise conspicuous consumption as they get farther and farther behind their neighbors financially. When it becomes impossible to keep up with the Joneses, people just stop trying.
Before South Africa had nine provinces, it had 10 Bantustans. The Bantustans were a continuation of the colonial African “reserve” system instituted in 1913. They were meant to control the influx of Blacks into “White” South Africa. This is how they really worked🧵🧵
The Apartheid government claimed that Bantustan lands corresponded with traditional African kingdoms. In reality, they were the areas left in African possession after the ethnic cleansing in the 1700s and comprised land deemed uneconomic for White habitation and cultivation.
Appropriating the then-popular rhetoric of African decolonisation, the Boer government established “independent, self-governing” Bantustans on some of the nation’s least desirable land to fool the West into thinking they had granted independence to Blacks.
When Europeans colonised America, they could have easily found slaves in Europe to work the mines and fields in the “New World”. So, why did they come hunting for slaves in Africa instead?
The thing is, during the Middle Ages—according to Emory University historian Prof David Eltis—Europe was so heavily populated that if the Europeans were primarily interested in the economic value of slavery, they would have no trouble finding slaves in Europe.
Prof Eltis writes that with “a properly exploited system drawing on convicts, prisoners and vagrants. . .[Europeans] could easily have provided fifty thousand [White slaves] a year without serious disruption to either international peace or the existing social institutions.”
How South Africa was broken and why it cannot be fixed🧵
Until the 1990s, those who claimed to want to change South Africa for the better were clear: it could only be done through the State. Only a government monopoly on resources could address the country’s vast poverty and racial inequality.
For a new government to tackle these deep social issues, it had to take over the economy and redistribute resources. When Nelson Mandela was released in 1990, he told his followers he believed in nationalising South Africa’s main businesses:
Let’s talk about Satanists and occult believers—the Skull And Bones version🧵🧵
Discussing secret societies is problematic because it’s easy to ridicule. The general public finds it extremely difficult to believe that the super-wealthy leaders of the Western world could be as insane as they really are.
Ordinary people roll their at stories about Satanists and the occult because, for the most part, they are level-headed, sensible people concerned with making a living. However, any knowledgeable historian will tell you how crucial secret societies have been to human history.
In the 1860s, Palestine, like much of Southeast Europe, Western Asia, and Northern Africa, had been under the control of the Turkish (Ottoman Empire) for a few hundred years. At this time, over 90% of the population of Palestine was Arab, while under 8% identified as Jewish...
The Arabs (who were majority Muslim but also Christian) and the Jews lived in relative peace. Meanwhile, all the way in Europe in the 1880s, a movement developed within the Jewish community. It said Judaism was more than just a religion; it was a nationality.
The Europeans who advocated the idea of Judaism as a nationality resolved that Jews deserved their own state. Between 1882 and 1903, 35000 Jews migrated to Palestine. Zionism—defined as the creation of a home for the Jewish people in Palestine—had arisen.
Muammar Gaddafi built one of the most impressive civil engineering projects in human history.[🧵]
Libya is one of the dryest countries on Earth, 90% of it being desert. There are places where it hasn’t rained since the 1990s. It only rains less than 10cm a year in areas where it does rain. For perspective, South Africa gets 5X that and is considered semi-arid.
Furthermore, Libya is the only country in Africa without a natural river. This makes Libya one of the emptiest and driest locations in the world, with 90% of the population concentrated in the north of the country near the Mediterranean Sea with a bare minimum amount of rainfall.