🧵THE MYTH OF “JEWISH” BOLSHEVISM DESTROYED - MASTER THREAD
Many of you are probably familiar with the widespread claim circulating on twitter, which claims that the Bolshevik revolution was Jewish.
This lie collapses upon minimal scrutiny of facts.
This thread will PUT TO REST the fairy-tale once and for all.
From now on, show it to anyone who repeats these claims. If they continue to assert it, be assured they are lying to you on purpose.
In a recent viral tweet, Pagan Neo-Nazi and Notorious liar ‘Orthodox Canonist’ insinuated that most ‘Bolshevik’ Commissars were Jews.
But that’s actually impossible. In the revolutionary government, Trotsky, who was later purged, was the ONLY Jew out of 17 total commissars.
This retard posted a picture of a Jewish school in Kharkov with Yiddish characters - as if every single other minority didn’t have their own characters too. You can show Arabic script in some central Asian school - Are Bolsheviks now Islamic?
ONLY 4% OF CHEKA COMIMSSARS WERE JEWS
Or does he mean Cheka commissars? Among them, a meager 4.3% were Jewish, while 54.3% were Latvian - who were 1% of the population.
JEWISH OVER-REPRESENTATION - ENTIRELY EXPLAINED BY EDUCATION
After 1923, the Cheka was transformed into the OGPU, which badly needed educated people as it became a more fully-fledged intelligence organization.
Despite the fact that nearly 70% of the Jewish population was literate, compared to only 40% of Russians, Jews still made up a meager 15% of the OGPU leadership at this time.
They did peak to over 30% briefly in the mid-1930’s due to the shortage of educated people (Baltic peoples were not within Soviet territory because of Brest-Litvosk, so couldn’t be recruited),
But after the Great Purges, with a younger Russian generation taking over as literacy and education levels rose among the general populace, they plummeted back to 4% of leadership.
JEWS WERE HELD TO A HIGHER STANDARD, HARDER TO GET LEADERSHIP
When you look even closer at the data, the notion of ‘Jewish Bolshevism’ even further collapses.
While being over-represented relative to their population, Jews were subjected to the HIGHEST standard to be accepted into leadership: 93% of them had secondary or higher education, compared to the meager 52% among Russians and Latvians.
That means it was WAY HARDER for Jews to attain positions of leadership. They had to be EXCEPTIONALLY well-educated compared to others.
ONLY 6% OF RULING ELITE WAS JEWISH
Neo-Nazis are usually extremely vague when they mention ‘Bolshevik commissars’ as they usually mean the government and party. Here are the facts:
Among full or candidate members of the Central Committee from 1917-1923, the highest power of the Bolshevik party, 17% were Jews. Of the TOTAL ruling elite of the Soviet Union, only 6% were Jews.
In the Central Executive Committee in 1929, Jews were neither a majority nor a plurality.
‘JEWISH BOLSHEVISM’ = LAUGHABLE
In the Soviet government more generally, one can simply laugh at the idea of ‘Jewish Bolshevism’ or ‘Jewish Communism.’
JEWS IN MAJORITY - RARE EXCEPTION, NOT NORM
There were moments of rare exception when Jews briefly had a majority in the Politburo - for 3 different years. But keep in mind the Politburo was beholden to the Central Committee. After 1926, Jews never made up more than 10% of its leadership.
*In CC list, numbers with (?) means there is lack of information of background.
ONLY 5% OF BOLSHEVIKS WERE JEWISH
Let us take a look at the total composition of the Bolshevik party itself. In 1922, a meager 5% of the party were Jews.
“No fewer than six other ethnic groups were more overrepresented” per their population size. Including Germans and Ossetians. Just compare them to Baltic peoples here!
JEWS: HIGHLY URBAN, STILL UNDER-REPRESENTED COMPARED TO LATVIANS
To be sure, Jews were not an entirely negligible presence in the party. Yet as we have shown, there was still WAY more Latvian and other Baltic over-representation in the party.
Further, when you factor in Jewish involvement in urban, intellectual and political life OVERALL, we see UNIVERSAL rates of high Jewish over-representation. And it turns out that the Bolsheviks were among the least popular parties among these Jews.
Obviously urban and educated people will be more represented in positions of leadership at this time. Not everyone could join the Bolsheviks. They required advanced levels of knowledge and education in the basics of Marxist theory.
In the Western part of the Russian Empire, Jews made up as much as 40% of the TOTAL urban population!
And yet still, we find a great deal of Latvian over-representation in the Bolshevik party, for similar reasons:
IN THE RSDLP JEWS WERE MAINLY MENSHEVIKS, NOT BOLSHEVIKS
When you factor in the party the Bolsheviks split from in the first place (RSDLP), the Nazi fairy-tale becomes even more ridiculous. At the 1907 convention of the RSDLP, for example, 30% of the Menshevik delegates were Jews, as against 10% of Bolshevik ones.
Stalin himself made the observation that the ‘overwhelming majority’ of Bolsheviks were Great Russians, compared to the Mensheviks.
WAS LENIN A JEW? - NO
Many point to the claim that Lenin himself - the founder of Bolshevism in the first place, was supposedly a quarter Jewish. Even if this were true, the very ‘source’ used as proof for it, admits that he was unaware of the fact.
But actually this claim, while widespread even among the liberal establishment, is dubious and almost certainly false. This claim comes from a deliberately distorted document of his pedigree, which, ironically, Zionists picked up after the 1990’s. Why?
Because the notion of Lenin having Jewish ancestry was unfounded throughout the entirety of the Soviet Union. So Zionists, seeking to smear the Soviets as ‘anti-semitic,’ found it convenient to team-up with Neo-Nazis to spread the lie that Soviet authorities ‘covered up’ his ‘real ancestry.’ Zionists saw this as evidence they were ‘anti-semitic,’ and Neo-Nazis that they were ‘Jewish’ themselves (lol).
BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION -POPULIST AND PEASANT REVOLUTION
The Bolsheviks were distinguished from all other revolutionary factions on the basis that they were true champions of the Russian peasant. While having their main nucleus of support initially among the factory proletariat, the peasants would come to be the strongest and most reliable base of Soviet power after the revolution.
Lenin distinguished himself from Trotsky, Mensheviks and all other factions in his notion of the “Democratic Dictatorship of the Worker’s and Peasants.” What set him apart is that he believed the Worker’s revolution had to be populist, and majoritarian in nature.
The Bolshevik revolution did even more to cement the populist nature of Bolsheviks, when the majority of the agrarian Socialist Revolutionaries - the Left SR faction - was absorbed into the Bolshevik government.
Even the corrupt Orthodox Clergy ran behind the liberal Kadet party, fearing the wrath of the peasant-led Bolsheviks.
Without a firm base of support among the majority rural strata, the Red Army couldn’t have won the civil war.
Therefore revolution could not have possibly been primarily ‘Jewish’ as Jews were almost nonexistent among the peasantry.
DID JEWS SUPPORT THE BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION?
Short answer: No.
They overwhelmingly rejected it. The ‘revolution’ Jews supported was the February revolution, and most of them were solidly behind the liberal Cadet party, and after that the Zionists. Both parties which the Bolsheviks banned and severely repressed.
In Russia’s first so-called ‘democratic’ election, over 60% of Jews voted for Zionists, and the rest mainly voted for bundists, Cadets (liberals), Mensheviks and Right-SRs. Keep in mind the Bolsheviks violently disbanded the Constituent Assembly itself - leading to ALL of these parties to either protest or even join the White Armies!
DID WALL STREET SUPPORT BOLSHEVIKS? OF COURSE NOT!
While not directly related to Jews, many Right-Wing Retards love to claim that Wall Street funded the Bolsheviks. A comprehensive takedown of this lie will be saved for another thread. However, the most famous claim is that Bolsheviks were supported by a banker named “Jacob Schiff.” Basic evidence contradicts this - not only did Schiff NOT support Bolsheviks, he supported the Whites!
There’s also a fuss made about ‘Olaf Aschburg.’ Aschburg was small banker whose ideology was a purely private and personal matter, had nothing to do with the banking world at large. At best, he defrauded some at Wall Street clientele for money and gave a small amount to Bolsheviks, but even then there’s no evidence for that.
Aschburg was allowed to manage the USSR’s foreign trade bank because of his experience, but was fired immediately a year or two after for mismanagement.
Beyond this, all claims about ‘Wall Street supporting the Bolsheviks’ are gone. Also you don’t even need this evidence. Why the fuck would Wall Street support the people who voided all foreign debts? Only retards who don’t understand how the banking cabal works, would think they would want their debts voided and lose all their assets.
ZERO COMMON SENSE!
BOLSHEVIK JEWS - ASSIMILATED AND DEVOID OF JEWISH IDENTITY
The entirety of the ‘Jewish revolutionaries’ stemmed from a generation that rejected Jewish identity entirely, rebelled against their parents, and sought to assimilate into Russian culture. They might even be described as ‘self-hating Jews’.
Trotsky and other ‘Jewish’ leaders were indifferent about pogroms conducted by the Red Army, even privately. Not only were these ‘Jews’ irreligious, they were Jewish only by blood. They had no sense of Jewish tribal loyalty whatsoever, as evidenced by the fact shown above that they were not even popular among Jews themselves.
These ‘Jews’ were largely eccentric personalities, and no doubt their cultural upbringing of intensive education and their adventurous spirit was a huge factor in both their appeal and ability to have some prominent roles in the party.
But they did not represent ‘Jewish power’ in any meaningful sense, evidenced by the fact that they totally rejected their own lineage.
ZIONISTS FOUGHT FOR THE COUNTER-REVOLUTIONARY WHITE ARMY, ZIONISTS SHOT BY CHEKA
One of the most prominent Zionist leaders in Russia, Danlil Pasmanik, not only supported the white army, but championed Fascist ideology before anyone even knew who Hitler was! “BASED Right-Wing” saving the West from Bolshevism, amirite fellow anti-Communists?!!!111
Even better, “BASED” White Officer, Anton Denikin, commended the “heroic activity” of “Jewish officers who fought selflessly against the desecrators of Russia” in his own memoirs.
Meanwhile, the “Jewish Commissars” (lol) of the Cheka rounded up and shot Zionists for counter-revolutionary activity.
Bolshevik propaganda was AGGRESSIVELY ANTI-ZIONIST, accusing ‘Anglo-Jewish’ Capital of enslaving the Arabs in Palestine.
RUSSIAN TSAR DEPENDED ON JEWISH CAPITAL, SO DID WHITES
The picture becomes even more striking when you realize that under the “BASED RUSSIAN TSAR” Nicholas II, Russia’s industrial economy depended heavily on “Jewish capital” according to the minister of finance. The situation was so acute that ministers under the provisional government admitted that without it, there would be no trade or industry at all.
We find some of the FIRST FUNDS for the White Army came from the JEWISH BOURGEOISIE. In Tomsk, Jewish capitalists spent SEVERAL MILLION rubles to support the Whites!
Freakin’ based, amirite orthobros?
Jewish capitalists, LIKE ALL capitalists, wanted to protect their position against the Bolsheviks, who industrialized the country in a way that overwhelmingly put the Russian peasant MAJORITY in power.
Thus, many Jewish capitalists supported the “BASED” White Army!
IF JEWS WERE BEHIND BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION, WHY DID “JEWISH BANKERS” SEND TROOPS TO KILL THEM?
The mind of a Neo-Nazi retard is perplexing. On the one hand, they suggest that Jews were behind the Bolshevik revolution. On the other hand, they simultaneously claim Jews controlled the Entente and started WW1. Which is it?
The same British government that gave Rothschild the Balfour declaration, was the NUMBER ONE power to fight against the Bolshevism during the civil war, and the BIGGEST contributor to the White counter-revolution.
Every allied government, including the USA, invaded Russia. You can either claim Jews run the banks, or they control the Bolsheviks, but you can’t claim both when bankers are directing their governments to attack Bolsheviks and supply their enemies with weapons.
It also is fucking stupid when you consider the basic fact that Bolsheviks forfeited all foreign debts and all debts in general, liquidated all private banking. HOW was this beneficial to the supposed ‘Jewish bankers?’ The world may never know.
‘JUDEO-BOLSHEVISM:’ THE PERFECT PROPAGANDA
Given all this shocking evidence, and the fact that NEVER in the history of Bolshevism were Jews EVER CLOSE to a majority of total leadership, where did this allegation even come from?
It’s simple. The Bolsheviks were a populist, majoritarian, and peasant-oriented party. The populations they appealed to, generally held anti-Semitic attitudes, because they associated Jews with petty usury (as Jews were barred from owning land, this was one of the professions).
One of the reasons Jewish presence among the Bolsheviks was so over-exaggerated is because a huge proportion of the Bolsheviks' own supporters harbored anti-Semitic feelings. This made it effective propaganda by exploiting tensions in their own rank and file.
The Bolsheviks were ONE COHESIVE unit. They needed every man they could get. They needed specialists, engineers, doctors, officers, everything. Spreading division was very harmful to Red Army operations.
Some pogroms were even conducted by the Red Army soldiers themselves. Though these were not encouraged by the leadership, who retained a principled stance on the matter and opposed all pogroms. But alas, they simply didn’t have control.
WERE ‘ANTI-SEMITIC’ OPINIONS PUNISHABLE BY DEATH UNDER BOLSHEVIKS?
The pagan Neo-Nazi liar @ocanonist made another viral tweet, in which he claims that “under section 58 of the Soviet Criminal Code” anti-Semitism was punishable by death.
You can read the entirety of Article 58 under the 1934 RSFSR Criminal Code here. NO MENTION of anti-Semitism!
The claim originates in a reply Stalin sent to the Jewish News Agency, which raised concerns over Soviet anti-Semitism. Stalin said that active anti-Semites were liable for the death penalty. But what did he mean by active?
He meant POGROMISTS, meaning people who commit acts of mass violence against Jews, which had been very common in the civil war.
Not only Jews, but all Soviet people were protected from any violence. Hence, Jews are not mentioned in the criminal code and weren’t considered special.
In the USSR, ‘anti-Semitism’ didn’t mean having prejudiced opinions. Privately, Stalin also harbored prejudiced views against Jews. It meant participating in pogroms.
BOLSHEVIKS WERE THEMSELVES ACCUSED OF ANTI-SEMITISM
On the eve of the October revolution itself, ALL OTHER leftist parties accused the Bolsheviks of demagogic anti-Semitism. SOUND FAMILIAR? This is what these shitlibs accuse us of too, even today.
They were seen as anti-semitic because of their populist orientation, which favored the rural strata over the more educated and urbanized population more generally.
Bolshevik leadership had a principled stance against anti-semitism. But unlike ‘leftists’ today, they forgave anti-semitic feelings among its supporters, seeing them as the result of a lack of education.
Being ‘canceled’ and getting called ‘anti-semitic’ did not discourage their populist orientation, they moved forward, championing the cause of the masses against ALL the bourgeoisie, including the Jewish bourgeoisie.
But curiously, the Neo-Nazis today only single out the Jewish capitalists?🤔I wonder who benefits from that?
‘JUDEO-BOLSHEVISM’ MYTH GLOWS
Just how was this meme able to be amplified so easily recently? With the rise of an authentic and populistic Communism, similar to the Bolsheviks themselves, gaining traction from people from all around the political spectrum, the amplification of this ‘meme’ is suspicious when you take into account there is not even a SINGLE GRAIN OF TRUTH in it.
Just look at how laughable and retarded these ‘memes’ are. When you realize how deliberately falsified it is, one cannot help get the impression it was some kind of fucking prank.
But it fully tracks with the fact that feds would prefer Neo-Nazism to gain popularity, over Bolshevik-style populist Communism.
Which makes sense, when you realize the whole fucking US federal government was weaponized against domestic Communism for nearly a century.
CONCLUSION: ‘JUDEO-BOLSHEVISM’ IS TOTAL BULLSHIT
Claims that ‘Jews’ were behind the Bolsheviks completely ignores basic facts of the circumstances by which Bolsheviks got to power.
While Jews did have a relatively disproportionate presence among Bolsheviks relative to their population, this was not because they were Jewish, but because they, like Latvians who were even more over-represented - had higher per capita literacy and education rates, being mostly urban, professional and middle class.
And even then, Bolshevism was DISTINGUISHED from other Marxist parties by the fact that it had far LESS Jewish representation in general. The fact that Bolsheviks led the revolution, proves the revolution wasn’t ‘Jewish.’ It was a popular revolution supported by the overwhelming majority.
We further see Jewish representation in Soviet government completely plummet after Stalin’s Great Purges, which should have buried this stupid meme forever.
But it did not stop the Nazi liars from continuing to KNOWINGLY LIE and still claim Jews controlled the Soviet government. This was pure war propaganda with no basis in fact, intended to justify their colonial project of rape, plunder and massacre against the Soviet people.
Nazi propaganda is the main source of why people today claim that ‘World Communism is Jewish.’ It has no basis in reality - especially not after 1939.
Neo-Nazis are the reason this lie has begun to resurface, and upon minimal scrutiny, it collapses. Be VIGILANT of anything these LIARS say.
THIS THREAD WAS BROUGHT TO YOU BY INFRARED AND RTSG Thank you to
@volkvulture1 @InfraHaz @REVMAXXING @Iran_Analyst @Mammothologist @AngelicReforms Additional credit to @wVivare and his well researched substack, which helped lay the groundwork for starting this thread.
🚨 Nobel Peace Prize winner Maria Machado is a US puppet and a ZIONIST 🧵
1) Maria Machado’s first big break in her career was founding an NGO called “Súmate” in 2002. Súmate is funded by NED and USAID, and was partly responsible for the attempt at recalling Hugo Chavez from office. This was a referendum coordinated closely with US state department agencies and US-based NGOs, and publicized by the Economist. Without a doubt, she was a major player in the attempt to destabilize Venezuela.
These efforts were able to achieve the consolidation of an opposition movement during those moments, which, despite the failure of the coup d’etat, was able to cause severe damage to the oil industry and the national economy via economic sabotage and a “stoppage” by managers and business owners.
The US embassy in Caracas opened up a series of “satellite consulates” (American Corners) in five states across the country – without the authorisation of the Ministry of Foreign Relations. These states, Anzoátegui, Bolívar, Lara, Monagas, and Nueva Esparta (Margarita) are rich in oil, minerals and other natural resources, which the US is seeking to control. These US headquarters found spaces inside lawyers associations and municipal councils controlled by the opposition, and continue to function as centres of propaganda, conspiring against the Bolivarian revolution.
2) In 2020, Maria Machado signed an alliance with Netanyahu’s party Likud. This alliance included ideological, financial, social, and security cooperation, with a specific focus on “countering authoritarian regimes.”
Israel, not Iran, has been the largest destabilizing force in the history of the Middle East since 1948.
The recent unprovoked attacks on Iran are just the latest violation of regional stability.
This is a list of Israeli wars and destabilizing actions in the region.
1947–1949: Nakba (Palestinian Catastrophe)
16,000+ Palestinians killed and 700,000+ Palestinians forcibly expelled or fled during the 1948 war.
Over 400 Palestinian villages were destroyed.
Marked the start of the Israeli policy of demographic engineering through ethnic cleansing.
1948: First Arab-Israeli War
Following the UN partition plan and Israel’s declaration, Arab states entered the war to stop the genocide and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians. Israel’s actions in mass displacement, a permanent refugee crisis, and armistice lines (not recognized borders).
Volkvulture has submitted a response debunking professional liar and pseudo-intellectual @Soothlayer—who claims nobody will debate him, despite blocking everyone who challenges him.
We will address the liar’s pseudo claims one by one.
Claim 1: "V. Vulture’s article tries to reframe American history as a latent socialist “civilization.” It’s loaded with idealism, settler nostalgia, and Duginist language dressed up as Marxism. If you have the article, ill be going paragraph by paragraph and unpacking the grift"
Response: From the first paragraph, the article in question not only isn’t trying to say that America is an ‘idealized’ or perfectly imagined ‘civilization’ but is pushing back on the tendencies in American socialist ‘historiography’ from the ‘progressive left’ and ‘bourgeois academia’ both. Not only is America not “inherently good”, it’s also not “inherently evil” nor a historical “aberration” or exception.
Claim 2: "Volk opens by calling both socialism and America “unbounded dreams”
Response: Not only does Volk not “call” American & socialism this, it’s a quote that Volk is
criticizing from the historian ‘Daniel Bell’. Daniel Bell was notoriously a self-proclaimed SPA ‘socialist’ in his youth and later became a hardened anti-communist ‘liberal’ historical revisionist & anti-communist sociologist in academia. Volk writes explicitly against the anti-Bolshevik & New Left historiography that tries to downplay American socialist history. The article also shows US socialist and democratic history’s significance within and for Marxism as being no less than any other great national revolutionary socialist and democratic tradition.
Volk’s writing directly says “socialism as it actually exists is neither unbounded, nor a dream”, and then says that “Our nation was more than dreamt of” and finally “Socialism and America are not dreams.” Blatant bad faith mischaracterization by Soothliar of the writing in question.
🧵The CIA feared the USSR could reach communism because they were reducing hours at the workday.
In "The Economic Problems Socialism USSR", Stalin gave an argument for how the USSR would reach Communism. He proposed doubling living standards, and reducing the hours of labor in the USSR.
Starting in 1956, the USSR begun reducing the total hours of labor, which had a deadline to meet by 1968. If this plan was successful, hours of labor would have went from 48 hours a week, to 30 hours a week, and the minimum wage would have went from 250 to more than 600 rubles.
1/4 The reason we believe it is so important to study the gold standard is that since the United States abandoned it in 1971, labor hours have not decreased and have instead remained stagnant.
This was a deliberate attack on the working class.
2/3 Unions have also capitulated to this reality, instead focusing on demanding higher wages—which will ultimately be eroded by inflation. This ability to erode wages and extend work hours is a hidden feature of the fiat dollar system. Bourgeois economists call it "full employment."
3/4 Due to the hidden power of fiat currency, wages can increase, but inflation can increase faster. This is why Marx ultimately concluded that workers could "rob" capitalists by shortening work hours:
"If the laborer uses his disposable time for himself, he robs the capitalist."
🧵Quotes from Nick Land (@xenocosmography) that are similar to Karl Marx.
1: Accelerating accumulation as the definition of capital:
Land: “Among [accelerationism’s] predictions is the expectation that you’ll be too slow to deal with it coherently.”
Marx: “Constant revolutionising of production, uninterrupted disturbance of all social conditions, everlasting uncertainty and agitation distinguish the bourgeois epoch from all earlier ones. All fixed, fast-frozen relations, with their train of ancient and venerable prejudices and opinions, are swept away, all new-formed ones become antiquated before they can ossify. All that is solid melts into air, all that is holy is profaned, …”
2: Capital as a process headed to a final crisis:
Land: “[The] deep problem of acceleration is transcendental [that] describes an absolute horizon – and one that is closing in.”
Marx: “As soon as labour in the direct form has ceased to be the great well-spring of wealth, labour time ceases and must cease to be its measure, and hence exchange value [must cease to be the measure] of use value. The surplus labour of the mass has ceased to be the condition for the development of general wealth, just as the non-labour of the few, for the development of the general powers of the human head. With that, production based on exchange value breaks down, and the direct, material production process is stripped of the form of penury and antithesis.”