Did "public health" shut down rural Minnesota to save urban NYC? No.
Early on when virtually nothing was known about a disease that was massively flooding ERs (& morgues) around the world, US states implemented stay-at-home guidance for a few months to protect their hospitals.
Governors made those decisions, and they did weigh econ & other factors alongside.
Turns out it's not good economics for a hospital system to collapse!
And there was no reason to assume that what was hitting big cities wouldn't ultimately hit rural areas too.
BTW rural communities in 2020 had similar COVID death rates to urban metros.
Lower than huge cities, higher than other metro areas, and higher than the overall national average.
By early May 2020, the CDC (public health!) had prepared detailed guidance for risk-based, phased re-opening of schools, business, day cares, etc. Not a simple open/closed binary.
There was plenty of debate at the time about trade-offs. CDC actually did issue guidance on safely re-opening schools - which Trump then trashed publicly.
Rather than attempt to support and resource safe re-opening, he just pushed a return to normal ops. cnn.com/2020/07/08/pol…
The choice didn't have to be open vs closed: it could have been to invest in safely reopening schools (more testing, enhanced support to schools, etc etc). I wrote about this at the time:
Not going to further relitigate the schools debate here but the essential point is: these were not binary options.
Public health guidance sought to manage risk in order to reopen in a safe & incremental way.
Trump rejected that, and pushed a false binary choice.
So Collins gets the history wrong and the public health wrong. It was not "public health" pushing the choice between open vs closed, it was Trump.
"Public health" was trying to reconcile COVID precautions with restarting schools, biz, etc - and that guidance was shot down.
It's easy to second-guess hard decisions made in the fog-of-crisis period when stakes are high and good info is scarce. And plenty we should learn.
But don't rewrite history in the process...
There is a concerted disinfo effort on the right to undermine "public health" by blaming it for all COVID-related grievances and airbrushing what Trump and other pols actually did.
Collins' answer naively plays into that. Unfortunate.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The effort to contain this outbreak starts with four strikes against it:
Momentum
Location
(Lack of) Medical Countermeasures
Weakened Global Response Capacity
Let's look at each.
Momentum:
The >1000 cases so far are undercount; # still rising fast as true scale emerges.
For context, the huge West Africa outbreak in 2014 was detected at 49 cases and rose to 208 a month later. So this one starts off *much* bigger. who.int/emergencies/di…
It's instructive to compare this against other major past outbreaks.
The largest Ebola outbreak in history, West Africa/2014 (which I worked on for @USAID), was detected at a far earlier stage (49 cases / 29 deaths) than this one (246 cases/65 deaths).
Deaths are now >88 and ⬆️
This one has already built up more momentum at time of detection.
Worrying because Ebola risk and response scale in an exponential, not linear, fashion.
Each extra uncontrolled case means tens of more people potentially exposed in super spreading events.
To mark the 6 month anniversary tomorrow of Trump‘s deal to end the war in Gaza, we at @RefugeesIntl teamed up with humanitarian partners to assess its humanitarian impact.
The headline: it is failing. But political will could salvage it.
🧵
The problem is not the plan itself; the problem is an execution failure.
Many of the humanitarian and civilian protection commitments of the plan are good & right.
But they are failing - and the deal's guarantors (the USG foremost) are letting that happen.
Getting the humanitarian components right is a crucial proof of concept for the wider deal, and a confidence building measure toward future steps.
If those elements fail with impunity, it is hard to see how disarmament & political/governance elements could ever succeed.