1/ I have respect and affection for the old-school liberals. They're people of integrity. And there were things they were right about, like civil rights and political free speech. In the 50s & 60s, their record on those issues was much better than the record of the conservatives.
2/ Today old-school liberals (Bill Maher's a good example) are in shock about Woke ideology's influence in the progressive movement and the Democratic Party. They see the illiberalism of the contemporary left as a betrayal of what they stood for. They're deeply distressed by it.
3/ There is truth in the idea that Woke ideology is betrayal of liberal values. But it's not the whole story. The whole story will require old-school liberals to engage in some serious self-critical reflection. There are respects in which they themselves bear responsibility.
4/ There are respects in which old-school liberals planted--even nurtured--the seeds of the plant whose manifest toxicity rightly distresses them today. Old-school liberals, in the 60s, bought into the worldview that the late Robert Bellah labeled "expressive individualism."
5/ Among their primary motivations for embracing expressive individualism was the affirmation of aspects of the sexual revolution. That was a conscious and deliberate choice that liberals made. They didn't have to make it.
6/ Some liberals--Irving Kristol, Richard John Neuhaus, Mary Ann Glendon--bolted from the movement or were excommunicated from it precisely because they rejected expressive individualism as incompatible with sound philosophical anthropology and the flourishing of human brings.
7/ Most liberals, however, chose to embrace some version of expressive individualism. It seemed to them to pave the way to "enlightened" policies and cultural changes. They failed to heed the parable of Chesterton's Fence. Thus was ushered in what I call the Age of Feeling.
8/ Faith and reason as the arbiters of truth and goodness were abandoned (though lip-service was paid to "reason" and, in mainline churches, even to "faith"). Feeling became the standard of judgment.
9/ "If it feels good, do it" was the perfect, if imbecilic, slogan of the aptly described "me generation." Some reflection will reveal how short the step is from expressive individualism to Woke identitarianism and illiberalism. Precisely that reflection is needed now.
10/ The examination of conscience I'm urging won't be easy. Facing up never is. When things go wrong, all of us--not just old-school liberals--want to believe that "we were right; our values were sound; it's just that we were betrayed and our movement was hijacked!"
11/ I'll end by returning to where I began. The old-school liberals are honest people. What's more, some of the things they stood & stand for are right. Those like myself on the conservative side need to acknowledge & honor that. (We have our own self-critical reflection to do.)
12/ The old-school liberals' sense that their values have been betrayed and their movement hijacked is not baseless or completely wrong. But it's only part of the story--the part that's easy to accept. It's the part that's not so easy to accept that now needs to be confronted.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ On the question of what caused the Civil War, can there be a more eminent authority than Abraham Lincoln? What can we learn from him? We know that he did not fight the war to abolish slavery. He made that clear. And yet, he stated that slavery was indeed the cause. His words:
2/ "One-eighth of the whole population were colored slaves, not distributed generally over the Union, but localized in the Southern part of it. These slaves constituted a peculiar and powerful interest. All knew that this interest was, somehow, the cause of the war."
3/ Lincoln continued: "To strengthen, perpetuate, and extend this interest [i.e., slavery] was the object for which the insurgents would rend the Union, even by war; while the government claimed no right to do more than to restrict the territorial enlargement of it."
1/ Over the past two months, the public has learned about some crazy things happening on college campuses. Folks are also now aware of some of the disturbing beliefs young people have come to adopt (e.g. 67% of 18-24 year-olds regard Jews as "oppressors"). What can be done?
2/ First, let's talk about what not to do. Don't further restrict free speech on campus. (Believe me, that will backfire.) Don't expand speech codes or further ramp up the power of DEI bureaucracies in the hope of, e.g., combatting anti-Semitism. It won't work.
3/ The problem is that universities have become ideological monocultures. Prevailing dogmas go unchallenged; dissenting opinions are rarely heard. Students are catechized, not taught. They assume that only an ignoramus or bigot would not agree with the campus orthodoxies.
1/ Repeating here what I've said elsewhere on this site. My friend Colin Wright has drawn some unfair criticism from religious folk who object to his expressing disappointment (as an atheist) that Ayaan Hirsi Ali has become a Christian. They view this as hostility to Christians.
2/ If someone thinks that someone else, especially a friend, has moved from a position he believes is true to one he believes false, of course he will be disappointed. That doesn't mean he's arrogant or regards himself as intellectually or morally superior, much less infallible.
3/ As Colin says in responding to his critics "We're all just feeling our way through life. I'm just trying to do the best I can, and am always open to other viewpoints. The fun conversation is where the magic happens."
1/ Democrat and liberal support for the idea that Israel is an illegitimate "settler colonial" apartheid state is roughly where Democrat and liberal support for the idea that marriage should be redefined to include same-sex partners was in the mid-2000s. msn.com/en-us/news/pol…
2/ The base of the party and the movement, its intellectual leadership, and youth brigades are there. On campuses, it's already unquestionable dogma. Office holders and politicians, holding fingers to the wind, aren't there ... yet. But they're heading or will be dragged there.
3/ More than 50 Democratic National Committee staffers--17% of the DNC's employees--have already signed a statement opposing President Biden's policy on Israel. That by itself gives you a clear idea of where things are going.
1/ I'm puzzled that people describe Cornel West as a "Marxist" or as "blending Marxism and Christianity." Cornel is a Christian socialist, but he is a not a Marxist. Indeed he is an anti-Marxist. He rejects everything distinctive and important in Marx's teaching--everything.
2/ People--on the left and right--who identify Cornel West with Marxism misunderstand West, Marx, or both. Brother Cornel rejects Marx's atheism and dialectical materialism, his historical determinism, his account of the class struggle and theory of the base and superstructure.
3/ Cornel is critical of capitalism and supports policies aimed at elminating large-scale economic inequalities, but he does not favor, as Marx did, the abolition of private property or the elimination of markets. Nor does he think violent revolution is inevitable or desirable.
1/ As the new academic year begins, I have some advice for students entering colleges and universities--especially conservative and religiously observant students whose views will place them "outside the mainstream" of secular progressive campus opinion. mirrorofjustice.blogs.com/mirrorofjustic…
2/ You'll encounter double standards. Don't be quiet about them. Ask for them to be removed. If necessary, be assertive and persistent, though always respectful, relying on the force of argument and the power of reason.
3/ You may experience prejudice, perhaps in grading, perhaps in other areas of your academic or social life on campus. If you do, try to find a friendly faculty member who can guide you and perhaps even advocate for you in addressing the injustice.