New Left identitarians, like Claudine Gay, discovered they could mimic forms of expertise as a means to power for their DEI activism. Her academic work is representative of a vast body of laundered research & credentials that prop up the entire DEI edifice. 1/n
In an audacious hoax project, @peterboghossian, @HPluckrose, & @ConceptualJames submitted ludicrous research papers to highly esteemed journals in DEI-related fields to expose the activist racket. 7 absurd papers were published, most in top-tier journals. 2/n
Up until now, laundering poorly researched ideology through peer review to secure legitimacy among elites had a cultural forcefield around it. Activist scholars & their students would level relentless ad hominem attacks & accusations of "isms" at anyone who questioned their legitimacy. The forcefield seems to be semi-permeable now. 3/n
Claudine Gay, who is fundamentally a DEI activist, stepping down from the top job at the most prestigious university in the world is a major development. She's likely to become a template to take down much more of the harmful activist infrastructure. 4/4
This documentary is a case study of the ideology & ethos embedded in DEI bureaucracies. It covers the relationship between identity studies, student activists, and the DEI administration of a college in Olympia, Washington. Part 1/3.
Recent congressional hearings in the US have created a broader willingness to look at higher eds ideology problem. University leadership has reached an inflection point that I’ll try to explain here in simple terms. THREAD
I’ll start by drawing a comparison between a scientific theory & a Critical Theory (CT), which is the theoretical work that underlies DEI administrations, most student activism, & the disingenuous testimony we heard at the hearings. 2/n
A scientific theory emerges from the observation of facts. It’s a kind of story we tell about why certain groupings of facts show up the way they do. 3/n
A renowned public intellectual, @Ayaan Hirsi Ali, tapped the zeitgeist with a recent article published to @unherd entitled “Why I am Now a Christian.” The piece is a literal come-to-Jesus moment for Ayaan, who is famous for her atheism advocacy. THREAD
Her decision to adopt Christianity was more than personal, Ayaan worries that the faithless “dislocated masses” of the West will not fare well in a civilisational war against The CCP, Islamism, Putin’s Russia, & the religiously Woke. 2/n
Her piece had major circulation because she touched the deepest layers of a moral & spiritual crisis of the liberal order. A crisis that appears to be drawing in a growing number of artists & intellectuals. 3/n
What explains this amorphous leftish coalition? It's not random - a particular ideological understanding of the world unites these issues. THREAD
These seemingly different interest groups are held together by Woke Identitarian ideology, which has a grand unifying theory of oppression called "Intersectionality". Here's an explainer montage I cobbled together from different NGO resources. 2/n
Like many words in the Internet era, the term "ideology" has gotten flabby. It’s commonly used to describe any collection of political ideas at all but this bloated definition deprives us of an important tool for pointing out a particularly destructive form of thinking. 3/n
In 1922, a journalist by the name of Walter Lippmann published a book called Public Opinion where he explored the limitations of the liberal democratic order in the burgeoning era of mass media. 1/n
This was a time between the world wars when innovations in radio, the telegraph, industrial printing, & cinema were being honed as powerful tools for propagandising the masses. 2/n
He argued that the public doesn’t have direct access to objective reality due to limitations in knowledge & access to information. Instead, they rely on heavily mediated info & simplified constructs to create a distorted image of reality that he called a ‘pseudo-environment’. 3/n
"What this issue has revealed is a crisis in the published medical research"
Jillian Spencer, a brave child psychiatrist, has connected the dots between problems within gender clinics & a system-level failure that begins with the academic publishing process. 1/4
Activist researchers are essentially laundering political opinions as established facts through the peer review process. The problem is a new form of epistemological (how we know what we know) activism that contorts knowledge resources from the source - academic journals. 2/4
This gives activists the appearance of expertise that grants them standing within institutions to make radical changes based on laundered evidence. The 'affirmation model' Jillian mentions is only one downstream effect of this problem & many more will surface. 3/4