Welp There It Is, Farting Cows, CO2 Levels, OZONE, The Globalist Climate Change Scam, It’s All A Lie
Senate Hearing Australia “CO2 Doesn’t Trap Heat — You Actually Can’t Measure Climate Change”
“Heat is Kinetic Energy, the energy of motion. So if you were to believe that CO2 “traps” heat, then the actual temperature would drop as temperature is a measure of mean molecular momentum. The Greenhouse effect is a lie. Unlike a greenhouse there is no solid object in the atmosphere that prevents heat from rising upwards through convection. Rather than being trapped Heat rises. The evidence of this is proven by the height of the troposphere which is circa 16 km high at the equator and only circa 6 kms high at the poles. What does trap heat is gravity which is the force that gives us our atmosphere. If there was no gravity, atmospheric molecules would fly off into space”
“Thank you Senator Babbitt and you touched on many good issues there and I too support this motion because at the end of the day what will start off as a $100 billion investment will end up much, much more than that because that figure has been actually quoted quite a few times and it was first quoted a few years ago. So it would already be considerably much, much more than what is quoted here. And I know actually I'm glad we've got Senator McAlister.
I've asked her in estimates. How are they tracking the cost of transmission lines up till 2030? How many kilometres of transmission lines are needed by 2030? Of course, we can never get a straight answer on any of this sort of information. We know that renewables not only destroy the environment, whether it's our biodiversity, et cetera, et cetera, but it's also going to destroy our economy. We've touched on this many times this afternoon and previously in the chamber.
But I will take up Senator Babert's comment about the science isn't settled. Because I actually think the science has been quite settled for quite a while. And it's actually called the Ideal Gas Law. It's actually, CO2 is actually a gas. And one of the things that really annoys me about this argument actually, and so it's more from the greenhouse effect in the climate change KPI.
You can't actually measure climate change. It states the obvious because at the end of the day you're often asked, do you believe in climate change? Well, guess what? Climate change isn't a religion. It's not something you believe in. It's something you understand. I think we all agree that the dirt spins on its axis every 24 hours, rotates around the sun every 365 days, has a slight tilt because of the gravity pulled from the moon, which gives us our seasons.
Tycho Bray came up with this stuff in the late 1600s, early 1700s, that the earth travels in an ellipse. So all of these factors will contribute to a change in the climate. That's not the issue. The point is whether or not you want to believe that CO2 actually traps heat, because that was the initial argument that somehow suddenly CO2 traps heat. Well, of course, that is an oxymoronic statement, because heat is kinetic energy. It is the energy of motion. So if you were to believe that CO2 was to trap heat, as these people say, then the actual temperature would drop, because temperature is a measure of mean molecular momentum. So the slower the molecules move, the colder it gets. So yet again the logic is completely flawed.”
- Senator Gerard Rennick
This continues on for over 8 minutes so I can’t transcribe it all due to X’s text limits but it’s an excellent listen!
Senate Hearing Australia “CO2 Doesn’t Trap Heat — You Actually Can’t Measure Climate Change”
“Heat is Kinetic Energy, the energy of motion. So if you were to believe that CO2 “traps” heat, then the actual temperature would drop as temperature is a measure of mean molecular momentum. The Greenhouse effect is a lie. Unlike a greenhouse there is no solid object in the atmosphere that prevents heat from rising upwards through convection. Rather than being trapped Heat rises. The evidence of this is proven by the height of the troposphere which is circa 16 km high at the equator and only circa 6 kms high at the poles. What does trap heat is gravity which is the force that gives us our atmosphere. If there was no gravity, atmospheric molecules would fly off into space”
“Thank you Senator Babbitt and you touched on many good issues there and I too support this motion because at the end of the day what will start off as a $100 billion investment will end up much, much more than that because that figure has been actually quoted quite a few times and it was first quoted a few years ago. So it would already be considerably much, much more than what is quoted here. And I know actually I'm glad we've got Senator McAlister.
I've asked her in estimates. How are they tracking the cost of transmission lines up till 2030? How many kilometres of transmission lines are needed by 2030? Of course, we can never get a straight answer on any of this sort of information. We know that renewables not only destroy the environment, whether it's our biodiversity, et cetera, et cetera, but it's also going to destroy our economy. We've touched on this many times this afternoon and previously in the chamber.
But I will take up Senator Babert's comment about the science isn't settled. Because I actually think the science has been quite settled for quite a while. And it's actually called the Ideal Gas Law. It's actually, CO2 is actually a gas. And one of the things that really annoys me about this argument actually, and so it's more from the greenhouse effect in the climate change KPI.
You can't actually measure climate change. It states the obvious because at the end of the day you're often asked, do you believe in climate change? Well, guess what? Climate change isn't a religion. It's not something you believe in. It's something you understand. I think we all agree that the dirt spins on its axis every 24 hours, rotates around the sun every 365 days, has a slight tilt because of the gravity pulled from the moon, which gives us our seasons.
Tycho Bray came up with this stuff in the late 1600s, early 1700s, that the earth travels in an ellipse. So all of these factors will contribute to a change in the climate. That's not the issue. The point is whether or not you want to believe that CO2 actually traps heat, because that was the initial argument that somehow suddenly CO2 traps heat. Well, of course, that is an oxymoronic statement, because heat is kinetic energy. It is the energy of motion. So if you were to believe that CO2 was to trap heat, as these people say, then the actual temperature would drop, because temperature is a measure of mean molecular momentum. So the slower the molecules move, the colder it gets. So yet again the logic is completely flawed.”
- Senator Gerard Rennick
This continues on for over 8 minutes so I can’t transcribe it all due to X’s text limits but it’s an excellent listen!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
