Megha Profile picture
Jan 4 4 tweets 2 min read Read on X
To help me post partum, my husband never: woke up to tend to baby at night (he tried at first but quit when he realized he was useless at it), changed a nappy, gave her a bath, changed her clothes, washed a bottle. No baby care, no cooking me food, didn’t wash one dish or ever do the cleaning…but he was the BEST SUPPORT I could have hoped for post partum.

Do you know why?

Because he stuck to his STRENGTHS instead of LARPing as a woman. He made sure I could stay with my mom and sisters post partum so they could baby me while I recovered. He got me the best healthcare support money could buy. He took me to beautiful and sunny places to relax. He bought us amazing dinners so I wouldn’t have to cook all the time. He made sure we could afford the healthiest food. He got me a maid to help clean the house. He made sure we lived in a building and pool so that it would be easy for me to make my body stronger without having to worry about childcare or driving to a gym every day. He works hard so that I don’t have to be separated from my baby 9 hours a day to work.

A man doesn’t have to become a woman to look after you.

So many of these shrew women, yes many who call themselves “conservative” HATE their husbands so they lash out at them by forcing them to behave like women, and then yelling at them when it’s not intuitive or easy for him to do. Men and women are different. We have different strengths and weaknesses. Expecting woman behaviour from a man is a recipe for disappointment. And vice versa.
TV Women when it comes to domestic chores: “we have to make it 50/50

TV Women when it comes to literally any other responsibility: “it’s the man’s job”
TV woman: a woman whose ideas about culture, relationships, history, politics are all downloaded from the mainstream propaganda. She is vile and narcissistic only insofar as the culture she has downloaded has made her this way.

A better description than “leftist woman” or “modern woman” etc
* A building with a gym and a pool* oof lost the time to edit.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Megha

Megha Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @meghaverma_art

Apr 28
Interesting speech by Eva, but she has missed a crucial and CORE aspect of the problem. It’s not just rapacious browns and blacks outnumbering the native population. The problem is in the decadence and atheism and utter depravity of native Europeans. The majority of Europeans are NOT Christian, except perhaps nominally. They do not respect family and faith. They are not getting married and having children. Prostitution and sodomy is legal everywhere. They desecrate their own churches with atheism and blasphemy. Of COURSE this Europe wouldn’t stand a chance against invasion. Of COURSE this Europe would sire an elite that seeks nothing but to destroy everything that was once beautiful about its history and people. Eva points only ever to the superficial aspect of the problem. But she is missing the main part, which arguably started as far back as the reformation.
In France, Christians are still severely punished…by their OWN people and have been for generations. It is fiercely “secular” country. Of course when a people come who believe in God, though they are Muslims, they will have more power and conviction and stronger families
When the Churches have been long abandoned by Europeans, they cannot complain when strangers settle in. In order for Europe to recover, it must reject all its atheistic elites. It must fiercely cleave to Catholicism again. As it did when Europe was at its height in the 13th cent
Read 4 tweets
Apr 22
Evolution is so obviously fake. I can’t believe people still don’t see this. You only need to put the idea to a few simple logical tests and it falls apart.

Observation: different species exist
Hypothesis: they were all one species and split apart due to a mechanism of mutations and different mutations surviving in different environmental contexts (evolution)
And what’s the experiment to test this?
“Oh these fossils or these animals look kinda similar so they’re probably related” 🤡
And oh sorry not THOSE similarities, those are due to “convergence”. Proof? Are you an evolution denying religious extremist? We don’t use PROOF around here.
Evolution believers are the most backward unscientific religious people on earth.
Every time there is a mutation it is ALWAYS deleterious. There isn’t ONE example of a mutation that is actually helpful to any species. And you’re telling me millions of coordinated mutations occurred to create complex systems over millions of years? Please.
Furthermore, if survivability and sexual selection determine the mutations that thrive, where are the half working eyes and half functioning digestive systems that somehow still manage to survive? (Because you don’t need perfection to survive) Why does every living thing have a perfect system? Because evolution is FAKE.
Read 6 tweets
Apr 9
The relationship you have before and after you’ve committed for life in front of God and family, is entirely different. She is a different woman. He is a different man. Serious commitment changes how people fight, love, cooperate, plan... That’s why living together before marriage is retarded.
“I need to take them on a test drive before I commit for life” say the couple who really just wants to fornicate without commitment.
And if there’s a baby? People who cohabitate are usually also okay with infanticide, sorry, “reproductive freedom”
Nothing you find out by living together is worth breaking up over. When people break up from living together it’s because they gradually lost so much respect for eachother that they quit. When you’re married you have the respect of serious commitment.
Read 6 tweets
Jul 23, 2023
How your “virtual community” reinforces your isolation

It was thought that long distance relationships become easier because of the wonders of modern technology. Friends, family can stay in touch oceans away. But there is a sinister, hidden consequence behind this convenience.
Because people believe that they can “stay in touch” no matter how far away they move, they do not prioritize efforts to move closer together and become strangers from the people who live next-door. Why bother when you can talk to more interesting people by opening your phone?
Staying in touch is an ironic phrase because you are not “in touch” at all

Without physical presence you can only have counterfeit relationships that satisfy you short-term but longterm, contribute to the suffocating isolation that plagues modern man, despite instant access to… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Read 9 tweets
Jun 26, 2023
In 2 years, surrogacy will be “normalized” by the mainstream and every celebrity who denied using it will come out. And the impoverished women who are bought and sold for this process will be forgotten like sweat shop workers in China.
Surrogacy is already a status symbol among wealthy Chinese families for example. They don’t use it because they have a “health issue”. They just don’t want to “ruin their bodies” with the process. Like an evil witch chasing perpetual maidenhood by devouring it from other girls.
Pregnancy and childbirth are inalienable parts of preparing a woman for motherhood. Women are naturally more narcissistic and vain than men. This is a form of self preservation. But pregnancy & childbirth kills that. The self preservation extends instead to her baby.
Read 11 tweets
Jun 16, 2023
There’s a trend, and I think I’ve only seen it in the last 5-6 years, of grown men crying when they see their bride walking down the aisle.

I have to say it is extremely gay.

Men shouldn’t cry at such things. It should be reserved for extreme moments of pain eg death.
Even I as a *woman* would be embarrassed and would not cry in public. I’d rather excuse myself and go somewhere else, do anything, but put my tears on display. So the groom crying at his wedding is even more GAY because it’s definitely done for vanity/show.
Consider why the bride never cries when she sees her groom during modern weddings? Surely she feels the same emotion? It’s because showing the man cry is part of the feminist ritual. “Look how you’ve already started to emasculate this man!” It’s like a triumph of role reversal
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(