🚨5 YEARS PRISON FOR ACCESSING ‘VIOLENT EXTREMIST MATERIAL’ ONLINE (unless you’re a fed or journalist)🚨
The new Prohibited Hate Symbols and Other Measures amendment to Counter-Terrorism legislation has outlawed the mere access of so-called violent extremism material online.
This would seem to apply to everything from PDF books, the ordering of books online, and even the storage of memes that could be construed as promoting ‘violent extremist content’. The irony is that the only exceptions for such possession are for those engaged in…
… law enforcement activity and journalistic activity, or activity of a private individual assisting law enforcement. So, the law itself is designed to be abused by police and journalists collaborating together to entrap private citizens. This offence carries a 5yr sentence. RT!
“Material is also violent extremist material if: it is ‘reasonable’ to consider the material together with other material; and were all of the material to be taken to be a single item of material, it would constitute violent extremist material.” So they can arbitrarily pair…
… unrelated items together to argue they’re ’violent extremist material’. So, would possessing a book in defence of nationalism and then separately an historical photo of some military unit be able to be considered together as ‘promoting ideology of violence’ and ‘violent acts’?
The law was largely the culmination of relentless campaigning from the chairman of the Anti-Defamation Commission, Dvir Abramovich. In parliament, promotion of the bill was championed by Attorney General Mark Dreyfus.
Furthermore, just posting a photo that features a swastika online is now punishable by 12 months imprisonment. 🚨RETWEET THIS IMPORTANT INFORMATION AND DECEPTIVE ATTACK ON PATRIOTS! 🚨
This Bill had bipartisan support, and the level of absurdity is such that they exempted the ISIS flag from banned symbols for the Muslim community. Islamic terrorist symbols are okay but pro-White symbols aren’t? Share far and wide❗️Australia 🇦🇺 is under tyrannical control!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵 DEBUNKING THE CIVIC NATIONALIST MYTH ABOUT WHITENESS IN AUSTRALIAN IDENTITY 🧵
Many colourblind civic nationalists attempt to argue that the ideal of a White Australia is not an intrinsic feature of Australian identity. This argument is meant to diminish the…
… role of race and ethnicity as the cornerstone of Australian nationality, and attempts to legitimise claims of historical continuity for a nationalism that is multiracial. However, a proper inquiry into Australian history shows that race was never considered merely incidental…
… nor was it to be considered a secondary aspect of Australian political society. Rather, it was its essence.
As far back as 1858, the racialist case (vs economic) for White Australia was fully developed — its ineffaceability made explicit by future NSW premier James Martin.
🇮🇱 THE JEWISH STAKE IN NEW DRACONIAN LAWS MEANT TO STOP ‘EXTREMISM’ IN AUS🇦🇺
The influence of the Jewish Zionist Lobby on this new law (which came into effect this week and could be used to target or entrap innocent White patriots) appears at every stage of its development.
As the BBC wrote, ADC Chairman Dvir Abramovich had been campaigning personally for 6 years to achieve the implementation of such laws in Australia. The ADC specifically says they want to advocate for “counter the defamation of the Jewish people and Israel.”
Despite the media reporting only on the ban of the swastika symbol and salute, the main purpose of the bill was to empower law enforcement to further encroach on the rights of Australian citizens. The salute was only inserted into the bill because the Liberals wanted it to be.
🧵 AUSTRALIANS 🇦🇺 AS DESCRIBED BY A WRITER IN THE 1900s 🧵
(paintings by Percy Spence)
Writer Frank Fox said this about Australians:
“In the streets the city men's garb refuses to conform to British conventions; the whole male population almost is straw-hatted.
“… The women, on the other hand, are dressed more gaily and expensively than is usual in the streets of a British city. This is due to the fact that in almost every Australian city some stretch of street is looked upon as a social meeting-place, and women dress for…
“… the street as for a matinee. There is no stiffness of social manner. The traditions of the old pastoral days still colour the people's life, and the stranger is looked upon with friendliness rather than suspicion. The usual greeting to a man who is introduced for the…
With #WhiteAustraliaParty trending as a charge against the pro-multicultural Liberal Party of 2023 for some reason, let’s take a look at what our Prime Ministers throughout history really thought about the White Australia Policy.
Edward Barton (Protectionist):
“The policy of this Government will be to bring about a white Australia… there is an interest of Australia, not only of labour, but one largely racial… It is Australia we have at heart.”
Alfred Deakin (Protectionist and later the original Liberal Party):
“A white Australia is not a surface, but it is a reasoned policy which goes down to the roots of national life, and by which the whole of our social, industrial, and political organisations is governed.”