The Cultural Tutor Profile picture
Jan 10, 2024 22 tweets 9 min read Read on X
A Brief History of Sydney Opera House... Image
What is the world's most famous opera house, or even most famous concert hall full stop?

There can be no doubt about the answer: Sydney Opera House, a global icon.

And the story of its construction was a drama for the ages... Image
It begins with Sir Eugene Goossens, conductor of the Sydney Symphony Orchestra — in 1947 he calls for the construction of a concert hall to match the rising population and status of the city.

The authorities eventually heed his call and in 1954 they select a site for it. Image
In 1957 an international design competition is held.

One of the entrants is a 38 year old Dane called Jørn Utzon. He is a visionary who wants to depart from the standard form of 1950s architecture.

This was a time when the blocky forms of the International Style were dominant: UN Headquarters, New York (1952)
Taking a cue from Brutalism — with its exploitation of concrete on a vast scale — and Expressionism — with its bold, flowing shapes — this is what Utzon came up with.

A simple freehand sketch that was utterly original & utterly perfect.

He wins the competition. Image
But how the hell would they build it? Nothing of this form had been constructed in human history.

Sir Ove Arup is brought in as the design engineer. He would become one of the greatest engineers of the 20th century, but even Arup said this was "an adventure into the unknown". Image
So construction started in 1959 and, slowly but surely, they found a way.

This was one of the first ever times that computers were used to work through the necessary structural calculations, perhaps saving them years of work.

A landmark in more ways than one, then. Image
The challenge of creating those now-iconic clusters of shells was solved when Utzon realised they could all be cut from the same sphere.

The revelation came to him while he was peeling an orange.

And so the impossible started to happen... Image
Amid cranes those concrete cowls rose in the midst of Sydney Harbour, on a former wharf called Bennelong Point.

Location is integral to architecture and they could not have picked a more dramatic spot

The Opera House would not so striking were it surrounded by other buildings. Image
The surface of the concrete shells was covered with interlocking ceramic tiles, over one million in total, half white and half cream, in a chevron pattern.

Utzon thought of the whole thing as sculpture, and he wanted its whiteness to contrast with the blues of the water and sky. Image
Another challenge, and one successfully overcome, was how to create the windows of the opera house.

This project was a litany of seemingly unsolvable architectural and engineering conundrums, but each was solved as the years went on.
Image
Image
And though we often fail to see it, the opera house rises from a colossal plinth.

Utzon was fascinated by Maya architecture and this plinth, along with the main stairway, was inspired by their temples.

That was phase one, finished in 1963; then the shells; then the interior... Image
But... costs were rising, delays kept coming, and the politics were heating up.

A new government was elected in 1965 and the new Minister for Works, a man called Davis Hughes, cut off funding for the project because of Utzon's management — an attempt to curry public favour?
Negotations were fruitless and, despite later protests to bring him back, Utzon was forced to resign in 1966. He left Australia and never returned.

The architect Peter Hall was brought in to finish the opera house; he controversially changed Utzon's plans for the interiors. Image
Alas, by 1973 it was finally finished.

And so the Sydney Opera House was formally opened that year by Queen Elizabeth II and, already a landmark for Australians, it quickly became a global icon.

Little more than 30 years later, in 2007, it was made a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Image
And there it stands, still, glittering on Sydney's harbour by the bridge.

What the Eiffel Tower is to France, Big Ben to England, the Sphinx to Egypt, the Sydney Opera House has become to Australia.

A symbol as much as a real building. Image
And its influence can be seen in the thousands of "strangely shaped" buildings that now decorate our skylines — it has changed the appearance of the world.

But all these peculiar megaprojects, intended to become icons, have yet to match the Sydney Opera House.

Image
Image
Image
People rarely use Sydney Opera House as an example of "modern architecture", even though it could hardly be more modern in design or construction.

Perhaps it has broken the mould and become so famous that it feels timeless.

But it isn't — it appeared in a specific context. Image
Everything changed in the decades after the Second World War, when what had been in the 1920s and 1930s the radical architecture of Bauhaus and Le Corbusuier suddenly became the global standard.

Vast concrete and glass towers rising all across the world. Image
And it promised so much! Things were possible that had once been unthinkable!

Well, Modern Architecture did what it had to: steady the world in a time of change and provide cheap solutions to the problems of rebuilding after war and expanding during massive population growth. Image
But, aesthetically, it has largely been a failure; public opinion shows people don't much like Modern or Contemporary Architecture.

They think it is boring, ugly, hostile, or needlessly strange.

Not only normal buildings (house, offices etc.) but would-be cultural landmarks: Royal Ontario Museum
Sydney Opera House is a shining example of what modern architecture could, sometimes does, but so often fails, to achieve — the wonders of modern construction have made architecture possible that was undreamable in ages gone by.

Those soaring shells tell us to keep dreaming. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Cultural Tutor

The Cultural Tutor Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @culturaltutor

Aug 31, 2025
We spend more than 90% of our time inside, so why do we design so many of our interiors like this?

Grey carpets, white walls, harsh lighting.

It's generic, boring, and genuinely bad for our physical and psychological health... Image
Not all interiors look like this, but too many do, and more all the time.

Grey carpets, white walls, harsh lighting, neutral colours for details, everything plastic, shiny, and rectangular.

This has become the standard for new buildings (and refurbishments) around the world. Image
A common response is that some people like it, or at least don't mind it.

Maybe, but that's the problem.

The sum of all tastes is no taste at all, and if our aim is simply to make things that people "don't mind" then we end up with blandness. Image
Read 22 tweets
Aug 21, 2025
The world's most famous neoclassical buildings are kind of boring and generic when you actually look at them.

It's even hard to tell them apart: which one below is Versailles, or Buckingham Palace?

So here's why neoclassical architecture (although it's nice) is overrated: Image
Buckingham Palace, despite being one of the world's most famous and visited buildings, is essentially quite boring and uninspiring from the outside.

There's a certain stateliness to it, but (like most big neoclassical buildings) it's really just a box wrapped in pilasters. Image
The same is true of Versailles.

Again, it's evidently pretty (largely thanks to the colour of its stone) but there's something weirdly plain about it, almost standardised.

Plus the emphasis on its horizontal lines makes it feel very low-lying, undramatic, and flat. Image
Read 26 tweets
Aug 17, 2025
These aren't castles, palaces, or cathedrals.

They're all water towers, literally just bits of infrastructure relating to water management.

Is it worth the additional cost and resources to make things look like this... or is it a waste? Image
These old water towers are an architectural subgenre of their own.

There are hundreds, mostly Neo-Gothic, and all add something wonderful to the skylines of their cities.

Like the one below in Bydgoszcz, Poland, from 1900.

But, most importantly, they're just infrastructure. Image
We don't think of infrastructure as something that can improve how a town looks and feels.

Infrastructure is necessary to make life convenient; but also, we believe, definitionally boring.

These water towers prove that doesn't have to, and shouldn't be, the case. Image
Read 24 tweets
Aug 8, 2025
If one thing sums up the 21st century it's got to be all these default profile pictures.

You've seen them literally thousands of times, but they're completely generic and interchangeable.

Future historians will use them to symbolise our current era, and here's why... Image
To understand what any society truly believed, and how they felt about humankind, you need to look at what they created rather than what they said.

Just as actions instead of words reveal who a person really is, art always tells you what a society was actually like.
And this is particularly true of how they depicted human beings — how we portray ourselves.

That the Pharaohs were of supreme power, and were worshipped as gods far above ordinary people, is made obvious by the sheer size and abundance of the statues made in their name: Image
Read 23 tweets
Aug 6, 2025
This is St. Anne's Church in Vilnius, Lithuania.

It's over 500 years old and the perfect example of a strange architectural style known as "Brick Gothic".

But, more importantly, it's a lesson in how imagination can transform the way our world looks... Image
Vilnius has one of the world's best-preserved Medieval old towns.

It's a UNESCO World Heritage Site, filled with winding streets and architectural gems from across the ages.

A testament to the wealth, grandeur, and sophistication of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Image
Among its many treasures is the Church of St Anne, built from 1495 to 1500 under the Duke of Lithuania and (later) King of Poland, Alexander I Jagiellon.

It's not particularly big — a single nave without aisles — but St Anne's makes up for size with its fantastical brickwork. Image
Read 18 tweets
Jul 31, 2025
Tell your friends! Your enemies! Your lovers!

The Spanish edition of my new book, El Tutor Cultural, is now available for pre-order.

It'll be released on 22 October — and you can get it at the link in my bio.

To celebrate, here are the 10 best things I've written about Spain: from why Barcelona looks the way it does to one of the world's most underrated modern architects, from the truth about Pablo Picasso to the origins of the Spanish football badge...Image
What makes Barcelona such a beautiful city? It wasn't an accident — this is the story of how the modern, beloved Barcelona was consciously created:

Image
And, speaking of Barcelona, here's why the renovation of the Camp Nou is — although necessary — a shame:

Image
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(