MetaLawMan Profile picture
Jan 13 7 tweets 2 min read Read on X
SEC v. @Coinbase, Update

The hearing on Coinbase’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings will be held on Wednesday, Jan 17.

There are four possible outcomes, with potential permutations to each. 👇
Option 1. Judge Denies the Coinbase Motion. 

It’s a low bar for the SEC. 

To win, all the SEC has to show is they have alleged facts making their claim “plausible.” 

The case moves on to discovery for a year or more until motions for summary judgment (like in @Ripple).
Option 2. Judge Grants @Coinbase's Motion "with prejudice."

This means the entire case is dismissed.  

It’s all over at the District Court.

The SEC moves on to appeal at the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.
Option 3. Judge Grants motion “without prejudice.”

SEC gets a chance to amend the complaint to cure deficiencies cited by the judge.
 
But, if the court rules the SEC lacks authority from Congress to regulate crypto exchanges, there would be no point in allowing an amendment.
Option 4. Judge Grants motion with respect to the claims relating to the 13 crypto tokens, but Denies with respect to the staking service. 

The case would then move on to discovery, focused only on the staking service and whether it qualifies as an investment contract.
The judge almost certainly will not rule at the hearing.

But, it is possible she will leave some hints through her questioning.

I will be in court in New York on Wednesday to see what I can see.

I will share my views on which outcome is most likely after the hearing.
Judge Failla understands the stakes are enormous in this case.

I would expect her to issue a ruling quickly.

"Quickly" for me would mean in under three months.

You can listen in to the hearing live at 10 am EST on Wednesday by dialing:
(888) 363-4749
Access code 5123533

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with MetaLawMan

MetaLawMan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MetaLawMan

Jul 12, 2023
New Crypto Regulation Bill.

Senators Lummis (R. WY) & Gillibrand (D. NY) have introduced comprehensive legislation to regulate the crypto asset space.

This is a revised version of a Bill the Senators introduced last year.

Here are 3 key takeaways...
1. The Bill would make clear that crypto assets that do not represent a financial interest in the underlying project would be commodities--not securities.

If a token carries with it no rights to dividends or interest payments or ownership in the issuer-it's a commodity.
2. The Bill assigns the job of regulating crypto exchanges like @Coinbase to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)--not the SEC.

The Bill includes strong customer protections, mandating segregation of customer funds and periodic reporting of proof of reserves.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 28, 2023
Crypto Litigation Update.

A lot will happen in crypto court cases in the next several months.

Each court decision that comes down potentially impacts other pending cases.

Here's a status report and upcoming deadlines in some of the key cases...
1. SEC v. @Ripple: Waiting for critical ruling from Judge Torres on cross-motions for summary judgment. Open question whether the Judge will address secondary sales of $XRP.

2. SEC v. Bittrex: (June 30) Deadline for Bittrex to file motion to dismiss.
3. SEC v. Genesis & Gemini:  (July 21) Deadline for SEC to respond to motions to dismiss filed by Genesis & Gemini arguing that the “Earn Program” is not properly classified as a security.

4. SEC v. @Coinbase: (Aug. 7) Deadline for Coinbase to file motion to dismiss.
Read 9 tweets
Jun 22, 2023
In an aggressive move, @Binance has gone on offense against the SEC in the federal court case.

Lawyers for the @Binance defendants have filed a motion accusing the SEC of engaging in unethical conduct.

This is a big deal.

Let me explain...
@Binance has accused the SEC of violating Court rules by making statements outside of court that are:

1) false;
2) designed to harm @BinanceUS's customers; and
3) likely to taint the jury pool.

Binance asks the Court to order the SEC to comply with the applicable Court rules.
@Binance argues that--after entry of an order agreed to by the parties--the SEC issued a misleading press release claiming:

1) it had secured "emergency relief";
2) CZ had "commingled" and "diverted" customer assets;
3) the order was "essential to protecting investor assets."
Read 8 tweets
Jun 5, 2023
1/ The SEC complaint against @binance appears to solve the mystery of why Brian Brooks abruptly resigned as CEO of @BinanceUS in 2021.

CZ allegedly reneged on promises that Brooks would be given autonomy to run Binance.US independently from @binance.
2/ The Complaint cites an unnamed source who ran @BinanceUS briefly in 2021.

We know from the dates in the complaint that the source must be Brian Brooks, who ran @BinanceUS for 3 months in mid-2021.

The complaint quotes testimony Brooks gave about his brief stint as CEO.
3/ Brooks testified that CZ broke promises made to him in the recruitment process.

As Brooks put it:

"I realized, huh, I'm not actually the one running this company, and the mission that I believe I signed up for isn't the mission. And as soon as I realized that, I left." Image
Read 4 tweets
Jun 3, 2023
1/ A Modest Proposal to Reform the SEC.

The draft Digital Assets Bill released yesterday by Congressmen @PatrickMcHenry @RepFrenchHill & @CongressmanGT presents--

A Golden Opportunity to begin to reform the SEC and rein in its tendency for regulatory overreach.

Here's how...
2/ Amend the Bill to say:

"At the conclusion of every litigated SEC case, the Court shall determine which party is the 'prevailing party.'

If the Court determines that the Defendant is the prevailing party, then the SEC shall pay all attorneys fees incurred by that Defendant."
3/ This would mean that--if @Ripple were to prevail in its case with the SEC--the SEC would be required to reimburse Ripple its $200 million in legal fees.

If the SEC loses, why should they be able to just shrug and move on after inflicting such enormous damage on a defendant?
Read 6 tweets
May 11, 2023
1/ BREAKING: The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has just filed a brief in the @coinbase v. SEC case, calling out the SEC for acting "unlawfully" in the digital asset space.

This is The U.S. Chamber of Commerce--not the Chamber of Digital Commerce.

This is a Big Deal.

Here's why...
2/ The U.S. Chamber is a highly influential organization representing companies in all industries across the U.S.--not just crypto.

The brief opens with:

"As it stands today, nobody knows for certain which digital assets, if any, are 'securities' under federal law."

Exactly!
3/ The Chamber makes 3 arguments.

1. Regulatory uncertainty is killing innovation in the U.S.
2. The SEC is destabilizing the digital assets regulatory environment.
3. The SEC is violating Constitutional Due Process and Fair Notice rights.

And the topper is...
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(