Senators Lummis (R. WY) & Gillibrand (D. NY) have introduced comprehensive legislation to regulate the crypto asset space.
This is a revised version of a Bill the Senators introduced last year.
Here are 3 key takeaways...
1. The Bill would make clear that crypto assets that do not represent a financial interest in the underlying project would be commodities--not securities.
If a token carries with it no rights to dividends or interest payments or ownership in the issuer-it's a commodity.
2. The Bill assigns the job of regulating crypto exchanges like @Coinbase to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)--not the SEC.
The Bill includes strong customer protections, mandating segregation of customer funds and periodic reporting of proof of reserves.
A lot will happen in crypto court cases in the next several months.
Each court decision that comes down potentially impacts other pending cases.
Here's a status report and upcoming deadlines in some of the key cases...
1. SEC v. @Ripple: Waiting for critical ruling from Judge Torres on cross-motions for summary judgment. Open question whether the Judge will address secondary sales of $XRP.
2. SEC v. Bittrex: (June 30) Deadline for Bittrex to file motion to dismiss.
3. SEC v. Genesis & Gemini: (July 21) Deadline for SEC to respond to motions to dismiss filed by Genesis & Gemini arguing that the “Earn Program” is not properly classified as a security.
4. SEC v. @Coinbase: (Aug. 7) Deadline for Coinbase to file motion to dismiss.
In an aggressive move, @Binance has gone on offense against the SEC in the federal court case.
Lawyers for the @Binance defendants have filed a motion accusing the SEC of engaging in unethical conduct.
This is a big deal.
Let me explain...
@Binance has accused the SEC of violating Court rules by making statements outside of court that are:
1) false; 2) designed to harm @BinanceUS's customers; and 3) likely to taint the jury pool.
Binance asks the Court to order the SEC to comply with the applicable Court rules.
@Binance argues that--after entry of an order agreed to by the parties--the SEC issued a misleading press release claiming:
1) it had secured "emergency relief"; 2) CZ had "commingled" and "diverted" customer assets; 3) the order was "essential to protecting investor assets."
1/ The SEC complaint against @binance appears to solve the mystery of why Brian Brooks abruptly resigned as CEO of @BinanceUS in 2021.
CZ allegedly reneged on promises that Brooks would be given autonomy to run Binance.US independently from @binance.
2/ The Complaint cites an unnamed source who ran @BinanceUS briefly in 2021.
We know from the dates in the complaint that the source must be Brian Brooks, who ran @BinanceUS for 3 months in mid-2021.
The complaint quotes testimony Brooks gave about his brief stint as CEO.
3/ Brooks testified that CZ broke promises made to him in the recruitment process.
As Brooks put it:
"I realized, huh, I'm not actually the one running this company, and the mission that I believe I signed up for isn't the mission. And as soon as I realized that, I left."
A Golden Opportunity to begin to reform the SEC and rein in its tendency for regulatory overreach.
Here's how...
2/ Amend the Bill to say:
"At the conclusion of every litigated SEC case, the Court shall determine which party is the 'prevailing party.'
If the Court determines that the Defendant is the prevailing party, then the SEC shall pay all attorneys fees incurred by that Defendant."
3/ This would mean that--if @Ripple were to prevail in its case with the SEC--the SEC would be required to reimburse Ripple its $200 million in legal fees.
If the SEC loses, why should they be able to just shrug and move on after inflicting such enormous damage on a defendant?
1/ BREAKING: The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has just filed a brief in the @coinbase v. SEC case, calling out the SEC for acting "unlawfully" in the digital asset space.
This is The U.S. Chamber of Commerce--not the Chamber of Digital Commerce.
This is a Big Deal.
Here's why...
2/ The U.S. Chamber is a highly influential organization representing companies in all industries across the U.S.--not just crypto.
The brief opens with:
"As it stands today, nobody knows for certain which digital assets, if any, are 'securities' under federal law."
Exactly!
3/ The Chamber makes 3 arguments.
1. Regulatory uncertainty is killing innovation in the U.S. 2. The SEC is destabilizing the digital assets regulatory environment. 3. The SEC is violating Constitutional Due Process and Fair Notice rights.