Brynn Tannehill Profile picture
Jan 20 24 tweets 7 min read Read on X
Last weekend, McKay Coppins of The Atlantic wrote a piece urging everyone to go see a Trump rally to see what he and his most ardent followers are REALLY about. I read it, and wow, he's so close to getting it, but not quite. 1/n theatlantic.com/politics/archi…
The (supposed) point of the article is that Trump is no longer the force that he used to be: his speeches are more incoherent, rambly, self-pitying, and boring than before. But, along the way, Coppins misses some of the really big insights. 2/n
First, I'll get it out of the way that I agree with him on one thing: Trump speaks in a weird shorthand that only conservatives understand. Except, this is not a new observation: I wrote about it in my book 3 years ago. 3/n
Image
Image
I'll also give partial credit to Coppins acknowledging "some people might not feel safe."

Uh, no, some people definitely are NOT safe. Trump has encouraged his followers to beat people at his rallies, and cops to rough them up. 4/n axios.com/2022/05/02/tru…
After 8 years of conservatives telling the public that trans people are dangerous insane child molesting and mutilating communist vermin who are dedicated to destroying America who must be eradicated, WTF do you think will happen if they figured out who I am? 5/n
Definitely not safe. And this is the first missed opportunity for epiphany: what sort of movement demonizes a tiny minority, calls for their eradication, and encourages violence? Sounds kind of fascist to me. Might as well ask black people to attend a Klan rally. 6/n
Coppins also fails to invert the question: would a really nasty conservative, standing quietly at a Biden speech be in any particular danger? Answer: probably not. I've seen people from the Daily Wire crash trans events. Violence is ingrained asymmetrically. 7/n
It also begs the question: why doesn't Coppins beg conservatives to attend a Joe Biden speech or campaign event to learn how nice, friendly and boring most Democratic supporters are? Or hear what Biden's policy goals really are, and not from Fox News? 8/n
You don't and this is part of the biggest problem I have with the article: the normalization of fascism, because the author fails to realize: he's standing in the middle of a fascist rally, and the people around him are every bit as good and normal as Germans circa 1932-1933. 9/n
Coppins tries very hard to normalize, and even empathize, with Trump supporters. "See, look, they're friendly churchy types!" "Yeah, they have some kooky views, but you should have empathy for these slightly misguided people." 10/n
Image
Image
What Coppins fails to realize (or say) is that even if Trump's act is stale, the movement he is the figurehead for is ascendant. I called this out in American Fascism repeatedly, and it's literally the first sentence in the book. 11/n
Image
Image
These are not poor misguided but otherwise very nice people: they're fascists, and Donald Trump is where he is because he's giving them what they want to hear, while promising them social supremacy and vengeance. They WANT the end of Democracy. 12/n newrepublic.com/article/177796…
If Trump keels over tomorrow of natural causes, the number 2 guy in the GOP primaries (DeSantis) is also a terrifying glimpse into a post democracy America.

It feels safe and normal to Coppins, because he is a straight white man from a conservative religious tradition. 13/n
He missed the history lessons from both the US and Germany that tell us perfectly nice, normal people who are wonderful to members of their in group can be the most ardent supporters of absolutely horrific movements: whether it's slavery, Jim Crow, or National Socialism. 14/n
Tons have been written on the topic, but I'd recommend "They Thought They were Free: The Germans 1933-1945" by Milton Mayer, "Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil" by Hannah Arendt, and 15/n
"Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland" by Christopher Browning. I'd also suggest "Narrative of the life of Frederick Douglass", which contains the following: 16/n Image
This is the gazillionth article that subtly (or not-so-subtly) tries to paint Trump supporters in a sympathetic light, motivated by economic anxiety (they're not) or simply by being misled by Trump and bad actors flooding the zone.

They're not. And media should be ashamed. 17/n
Where's the flood of articles following the 20% of trans people who have already fled red states because they see what's coming from this fascist movement? There's some legitimate anxiety. Where's the "humanization" of Biden supporters? 18/n
There has been a fascination with what make people support horrific movements, but less so about how much responsibility they bear for supporting this movement. In WWII, we went directly to obliterating them if they were standing too close to something of military value. 19/n Image
The only reason we (and by we, I mean the media and public at large) haven't acknowledged this movement as something horrific beyond words is because we haven't reached the "Oh God, they're all dead. What have we done?" part of the cycle. 20/n
And if you think this is hyperbole, consider this letter sent to a trans content creator recently. Even if this didn't happen (and it probably didn't), they certainly fantasize about it. This is coming from the sort of "good" people you find at a Trump rally. 21/n Image
In the end, this article was a huge missed opportunity for epiphany. About the banality of evil. About how fascism is deeply embedded in American politics, Trump or no. It notices "Trump got stale, but he's still winning. Weird." but doesn't ask "Why?" 22/n
I suspect it's because they answer to "why" speaks to a deeper, and extremely ugly, truth: we have normalized fascism, and a desire for dictatorship writ large in the US, and we're about to get it in the face with both barrels. 23/n
And here's the thing: I don't hate them. They're just average human beings. They may dream of eradicating me, but not vice versa.

However, they scare the hell out of me because I know very well where movements like theirs eventually go.

Where we're going now. Where I am. 24/n

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Brynn Tannehill

Brynn Tannehill Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BrynnTannehill

Jan 20
Ok, I tried DM'ing McKay before about things, and he didn't respond. But, I will try to succinctly summarize what my issues with the article were. (Good stuff up front: his prose is always tight and evocative). 1/n
The problems generally fit into two categories:

1. The information in the article often doesn't break new ground, or repeats media mistakes of the past

2. When it does offer a new insight, it doesn't take the next steps of asking "why" and "what does it mean?" 2/n
Regarding point 1, it's normalizing Trump supporters, looking for nice-ish reasons why they're there, begging people to try to understand them (done a million times since 2015). Old hat really. 3/n
Read 16 tweets
Jan 17
I'd like to address a longstanding problem for Democrats, Biden, and Senator Sanders: namely laying out an agenda for a second term. It's harder than you might think: in fact, it's nearly impossible. 1/n theguardian.com/us-news/2024/j…
The BLUF is that Biden can promise all sorts of things, but due to institutional dysfunction and a Senate composition that is biased by 7 points (and growing) towards the GOP, plus the filibuster, moving any sort of legislation forward is nearly impossible. 2/n
Unless the President's party controls the House and Senate, almost nothing is going to make it through. Only 22 bills passed in 2023 with the House controlled by the GOP. House Republicans have zero interest in compromises. 3/n
Read 13 tweets
Jan 14
A lot of people in the past have talked about the effect mass deportations would have on US industry like home starts and agriculture. I'd going think through it out from a logistics perspective, because I believe the comparison below is flawed. Stick with me here. 1/n
First: basic facts. There's about 10.5 million people in the US right now, according to some of the more reliable, neutral estimates available. This is down from the peak of 12.2m in 2007. 2/n Image
The US has seen an increase in apprehensions by CBP. There are undoubtedly more people attempting entry. The denominator (total) is something of a known unknown. A relatively strong post-COVID economic recovery seems to be the driver. 3/n cato.org/blog/us-labor-…
Read 17 tweets
Jan 7
There's something going on in my Twitter posts, and it kind of stinks of Farms in St. Petersburg, if you catch my drift. Which is why I'm announcing a new kind of person (or bot) I will block on sight. Short thread. 1/n
Something keeps popping up over and over again among accounts that appear so far left that they're basically tankies (warning sign number 1). Many have blue checks now (number two). They show up to say that there's zero difference between Biden and Trump. 2/n
This is just utter nonsense. Biden won't eradicate trans people, or birth control, abortion. He won't invoke the insurrection act to get a Tiananmen Square massacre of protesters. Not going to withdraw from NATO and give Ukraine to Putin. 3/n
Read 13 tweets
Jan 4
I got a bit of "fan mail" yesterday that touched on something I've been meaning to post about for a while: namely why I'm not a huge fan of the "Trans women are women" slogan because its imprecision invites this. I'd also be curious what I misunderstand about Christianity. 1/n Image
First off, I don't believe that people can "change sex" in the way this gentleman suggests. Indeed, the trans community has eschewed the term "sex change" for decades (since the mid-90's, really). Transition, and it's result, has a somewhat more complicated definition. 2/n
I am well aware of my biology and history. I did not "change sex". To relieve my long running gender dysphoria (decades) I took medical, social, and legal steps to live in accordance with my gender identity. 3/n
Read 17 tweets
Jan 3
Here's the thing: imagine what happens when he's in office, has purged the top ranks of the military, filled them with loyalists, and invoked the Insurrection Act...

Trump's power to bully his way into getting what becomes unlimited. Examples: 1/n
Suppose a judge might rule against his administration? A hint that there's a cell at Leavenworth waiting for them (or worse) would pop up. And, he'd only have to carry through once or twice to get the results he wants.

No due process, just martial law. 2/n
What if Dems control the House? You wouldn't have to lock up that many to get the results he wanted, or even flip the House.

Ditto blue state officials.

This is what @mashagessen meant when she wrote "your institutions will not save you." 3/n
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(