If you do a deep dive on this, you find out that Arabs pushing their African maids/slaves out of upper-story windows is actually "a thing", though it hasn't received a ton of media coverage.
E.g. this 2011 BBC report on Malagasy maids in Lebanon, which mentions that, among many other abuses, they were sometimes deliberately crippled by being pushed out of windows.
Or, this 2014 comic, which dramatizes the experience of an Ethiopian maid in Saudi Arabia, who, in addition to being raped by the man of the house, was eventually pushed out of a window by her mistress after demanding her wages.
Apparently it's not exclusive to African maids. In 2017 a Moroccan maid in Saudi Arabia was thrown out of a window by her employer.
In 2010, a Kenyan maid accused her Saudi employer of throwing her out of a third-floor window, breaking her legs and hands.
All in all, maid defenestration may not be its own "thing", but may be one of many abuses and occupational hazards visited upon foreign servants in countries that place little value on their lives. There have been numerous deaths by falling among maids in Singapore and Hong Kong.
By which I mean, I don't know if pushing your maid out the window is a institutionalized practice in Arab states. It might just be the result of employers getting creative with abuse, or demanding that the maids do unsafe tasks. But it *is* really weird that it happens at all.
Also, here is a link to the full comic that recounts the story of Almaz, the Ethiopian maid who was pushed out a window. A very eye-opening look at the treatment of foreign domestic workers in the Gulf states.
European countries whose constitutions contain explicit references to culture, identity, language, ethnos, or nationhood that unambiguously or arguably establish it as a state for, or centered on, or indelibly connected to a particular people, i.e. an "ethnostate"
Most ex-communist countries have this. Croatia is a typical example: A preamble recapitulating the history of the nation, language establishing it as a nation state for the nation's titular people, and sometimes explicit enumeration of historic national minorities.
Hungary absolutely bats it out of the park. Not going to reproduce all of it here. This is the Orbán constitution, but the language used is really not all that much stronger than many other ex-communist states whose constitutions have attracted no particular controversy.
Countries that had no awareness, understanding, or appreciation of entire eras of their ancient history have no greater of a moral claim on artifacts from those eras than the Europeans who discovered, studied, translated, and reconstructed them, often for the first time ever.
Rather than the Benin bronzes, which were literally looted, an example of artifacts which should *never* be returned are the Assyrian reliefs at the British Museum—legally acquired at a time when no one else knew of or cared about their existence, and in real danger if returned.
British and French archaeology of the ancient Near East began decades before the first Ottoman archaeological regulations. The lamassus in the British Museum were acquired in 1851, 18 years before the first regulations were enacted.
This is like saying "Lincoln Cathedral is older than the Ming Dynasty." A vacuous triviality that only sounds revelatory if you don't know anything about Mesoamerican history. The Aztecs were not ancient; they were a very "modern" state that hearkened back to ancient forebears.
I enjoy Crémieux's content, but almost everything in that thread is just bait for ignorant RW accounts to gloat about history. Harvard is older than Hasidic Judaism? Wow, I'm just hearing this now. Next you'll tell me that the College of William & Mary is older than Methodism.
Like... How could this possibly be considered surprising. The whole story of the Cherokee alphabet is how it was one facet of the Cherokees' attempt to assimilate into and be accepted by the cultural and legal order of the young United States...
Deserving of a more thorough discussion, but:
- Yom Kippur is not about kapparot
- A substantial number of Orthodox Jews have always rejected kapparot
- Kapparot is not supposed to be a sacrifice
- You are not supposed to believe your sins are literally transferred to the chicken
It's supposed to be a charitable act in which a chicken or money is given to the poor, with the idea of the offering as a "substitute" being a purely symbolic reflection on Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement. Nonetheless, many rabbis have historically rejected it as a superstition.
Many Jews, Orthodox and otherwise, have also objected to the practice on animal welfare grounds in modern times.
There are lots of comparisons to make between the systems established after the Spanish and Islamic conquests, but I think what made the Islamic system different—and in my opinion, worse—was the abjection and oppression of the supposedly "protected" dhimmi communities.
Obviously with variation across time and place, but across the sweep of history the dhimma system contrived to subject those who resisted or deferred conversion to Islam to humiliation, ruin, and ever-further diminishment.
Basically constantly increasing precarity until the point where they were vulnerable to social extinguishment or outright physical annihilation, a point which they faced in the 20th and 21st centuries in the Middle East and centuries ago in North Africa (Christians, anyway).
In Greece's defense, this was a mutual ethnic cleansing with Turkey brokered by international powers at the Lausanne Conference—Fridtjof Nansen, the League of Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, decided that population exchange was the only viable solution.
My understanding is that if the 1947 Palestine partition plan had been carried out, there would have been internationally-sanctioned relocation of Arabs from the Jewish state to the Arab state. But the flight and expulsion that actually happened was far more violent and lawless.
Worth remembering that it also took a lot of "population engineering" even after the genocide to make Armenia 99% Armenian. Its location is basically a historically accidental slice of territory, and it would have made at least as much sense in other places.