Roy Profile picture
Jan 22 8 tweets 4 min read Read on X
If you do a deep dive on this, you find out that Arabs pushing their African maids/slaves out of upper-story windows is actually "a thing", though it hasn't received a ton of media coverage.
E.g. this 2011 BBC report on Malagasy maids in Lebanon, which mentions that, among many other abuses, they were sometimes deliberately crippled by being pushed out of windows. Image
Or, this 2014 comic, which dramatizes the experience of an Ethiopian maid in Saudi Arabia, who, in addition to being raped by the man of the house, was eventually pushed out of a window by her mistress after demanding her wages.
Image
Image
Apparently it's not exclusive to African maids. In 2017 a Moroccan maid in Saudi Arabia was thrown out of a window by her employer. Image
In 2010, a Kenyan maid accused her Saudi employer of throwing her out of a third-floor window, breaking her legs and hands. Image
All in all, maid defenestration may not be its own "thing", but may be one of many abuses and occupational hazards visited upon foreign servants in countries that place little value on their lives. There have been numerous deaths by falling among maids in Singapore and Hong Kong.


Image
Image
Image
Image
By which I mean, I don't know if pushing your maid out the window is a institutionalized practice in Arab states. It might just be the result of employers getting creative with abuse, or demanding that the maids do unsafe tasks. But it *is* really weird that it happens at all.
Also, here is a link to the full comic that recounts the story of Almaz, the Ethiopian maid who was pushed out a window. A very eye-opening look at the treatment of foreign domestic workers in the Gulf states.

positivenegatives.org/story/almaz/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Roy

Roy Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @royllovians

May 16
Two years ago I made a thread discussing these "Talmud quote compilation" memes. The nice thing is that the entire Talmud is available online for anyone to read for free at Sefaria, so we can actually follow up on these citations. Let's take a look at a couple more.
Let's start with one of the ones that looks more weird and tyrannical than heinous and barbaric: The image claims that Eruvin 21b says "Whosoever disobeys the rabbis deserves death and will be punished by being boiled in hot excrement in hell." What does Eruvin 21b actually say?
Eruvin 21b opens in the middle of a discussion, continued from the previous section, in which verses from Jeremiah and the Song of Songs are explained as comparing the righteous and wicked to fragrant figs, and pure men and women to mandrakes and choice fruits. Okay.
Image
Image
Read 14 tweets
Apr 13
A firsthand account from British Assyriologist Archibald Sayce. Did 19th-century Western archaeologists "steal" artifacts from Ottoman lands? Did anyone regard it as stealing or try to stop them?
Image
Image
What's notable is what's not said as much as what is said: There are no references to interference by local authorities, demands for permits, or paperwork for exporting artifacts. Antiquarian surveys were not an area of human activity regulated by the Ottomans.
It's clear that the idea of these archaeological missions being "theft" is a projection of modern politics and law onto the past: Open borders advocates point out that 19th-century borders were often hardly regulated compared to borders today. It turns out this cuts both ways.
Read 6 tweets
Apr 8
On a not quite related note, I've sometimes heard it said that Indians "didn't have history" and didn't know anything about their own ancient history until the British studied it—with regard to the proper use of the word "history", this is certainly untrue—
—from the development of writing in India, Indian rulers certainly *did* record their deeds and accomplishments in inscriptions and monuments and so on—this is "history". The actual claim they seem to be making is that Indians didn't have *historiography*—writing *about* history.
I personally don't know if it's true that Indians didn't have historiography, i.e. written "histories" that summed up, systematized, and analyzed the historical events that kings recorded in inscriptions.
Read 8 tweets
Apr 7
Wrt "British Museum" discourse, it cannot be emphasized enough that, with few exceptions, the ancient civilizations of the Near East played no role at all in the culture or identity of the Arab and/or Islamic peoples of the region before European archaeologists rediscovered them
It is not even that Muslims, in principle, often regarded pre-Islamic cultures with contempt—in fact, neither they nor anyone else had any knowledge or memory of ancient Near Eastern cultures beyond that preserved in Greek tradition until the work of 19thC European archaeologists
The main exception being Iran, which did place significant value on its pre-Islamic history—even so, Muslims still regarded it with ambivalence. The Zoroastrian tradition through which this knowledge was preserved also did not preserve a coherent pre-Sassanid historical timeline.
Read 21 tweets
Feb 13
White people converting to Islam is almost always a form of transracialism.

It is often also a way for men to claim masculinity (see Andrew Tate).
If there was a religion that allowed you to transracially convert into being an Eastern European thug, it would majorly cut into Islam's monopoly on conversions of lost and insecure young men. (I don't think Eastern Orthodoxy is really on top of that yet.)
In a rather comparable way, identifying as a Republican serves as a masculine prosthetic for young gay men in the US.
Read 5 tweets
Aug 17, 2022
A funny thing some anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists believe is that the word "goyim" *literally* means "cattle". Of course, it actually means "nation", or by extension, "foreigner". We can see this in the Bible. Unless God was calling the progeny of Abraham a "great cow"...


Image
Image
Image
Image
More examples of people thinking the word "goy" literally means "cow". The word "goy" in the common sense of "foreigner" can have an unfriendly connotation, but the word is not originally a term of abuse and is a completely neutral equivalent of the Greek/English term "gentile".


Image
Image
Image
Image
Yet more examples.


Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 39 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(