Sources confirm that Trump is directly trying to tank Ukraine/border negotiations to deny Biden a political win and keep immigration as a campaign issue this year.
There's a few ways this might go. Few are good for Ukraine, and above all, precious time has been wasted. 🧵
Despite McConnell's comments, not all Republicans are on board.
"Somebody who is trying to defeat legislation, all in the name of running for office? That is irresponsible," @BillCassidy told @USATODAY. usatoday.com/story/news/pol…
It's possible McConnell is trying to open the path to delinking Ukraine and immigration reform so that a Ukraine (maybe w/ Israel) package can be put forward on its own merits.
As a Senate Republican staffer said privately last week, the votes for Ukraine are absolutely there.
But Trump's direct intervention could also tank a Ukraine deal. He hasn't come out publicly against yet—thankfully—but doing so would make it very difficult for Republicans to defy him in an election year. He'd single them out, & doing the right thing just isn't worth it to many.
No matter what, it's worth remembering just how much time has been wasted here. Ukraine is running out of ammo, more missiles are getting through air defense, more people are dying.
This delay is happening because some are choosing political power over national interest.
The worst of cynical politics are on display from Republicans and Trump here. McCarthy thought linking Ukraine/border could save his speakership, the White House was willing to make a deal, and now Ukraine is being treated like nothing more than a bargaining chip.
From colleagues doing regular meetings with congressional offices, there is zero energy or motivation to make something happen on Ukraine. They support Ukraine, but they don't feel the urgency or like they have a chance of making something happen themselves.
Many Republicans want to aid Ukraine, but they won't break with Trump over it.
For European (and especially Ukrainian) observers, remember that many of these officials could have been killed by Trump's people on January 6, yet they still stand by him. Trump's the X factor here.
Above all, this shows that US politics in 2024 are too unmoored from rational statecraft for Europe and Ukraine to rely on America. That is a devastating reality.
I'm hoping to publish a more detailed article soon on what Europe can do to hedge against a second Trump admin.
The coming days will be critical for Ukraine.
Does Trump come out against a deal? Does the Senate bring something to a vote anyway? Can Ukraine and immigration be delinked?
America's allies are watching. Putin is watching. Ukrainians are fighting and dying.
What are we doing?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨The @guardian has learned a major anti-Ukraine conference will be held in Washington, DC tomorrow.
@Heritage Foundation will bring together Hungarian President Viktor Orbán’s team & Republican congressmen to strategize how to end US support for Ukraine. theguardian.com/us-news/2023/d…
A diplomatic source close to the Hungarian embassy told the @guardian: “Orbán is confident that the Ukraine aid will not pass in Congress. That is why he is trying to block assistance from the EU as well.”
@guardian Ukraine aid was blocked in the Senate last week. That sent a dangerous signal to Putin and other strongmen like Orbán and Xi that our divisions can be exploited to harm Ukraine and weaken America.
Orbán is trying exactly that, tomorrow in Washington and this week with the EU.
We're still getting more details about today's strike against a Russian military airfield at Novofedorivka in occupied Crimea, but a few big implications are already clear.
Chief among them: The West has spent months investing in Ukraine—now we're starting to see the payoff.🧵
A defining feature of this war is how quickly and smartly Ukraine's employed sophisticated weapons systems from a West that hasn't always been eager to provide them.
Each time UA got something, it used it effectively and showed that more and better weapons wouldn't go to waste.
The latest example of this is HIMARS. The West was supremely reluctant to provide multiple launch rocket systems, but after pressure, finally provided them.
By all accounts, the system has been a game-changer.