In honor of Holocaust Remembrance Day, I've decided to put my series on Holocaust revisionism in an easy-to-navigate thread
Here is nearly everything you've ever wanted to know about Holocaust revisionism
First up, let’s look at the scientific evidence against the gas chambers, mass graves, as well as some of the numeric anomalies of Auschwitz
The first clip is of Fred Leuchter who wrote the Leutcher Report that comprehensively examined Auschwitz
Next let's discuss how German confessions were obtained through torture, the human lampshade & soap claims, and one of the most interesting Holocaust facts:
No document had ever been found where Hitler ordered any exterminations
Next, here’s a Jewish man, David Cole, on the inconsistencies of the gas chambers (wood doors & other illogical construction), as well as explaining the piles of hair and shoes
David is surprised “how little evidence there is for the Holocaust”
Next, here's David Irving discussing how there wasn’t enough coke to cremate the number of bodies the camp claimed to have cremated, the Germans making no references to gas chambers in private or public documents, and the gas chambers on the Auschwitz tour being “reconstructions”
With so many Holocaust survivors telling stories of the Holocaust many have been exposed as false
From the infamous Elie Wiesel to the lady who claimed to be raised by wolves, here’s just a few of the Holocaust claims that have been debunked:
Next, What was life was like inside the “death” camps?
Well the camps had theaters, swimming pools, soccer leagues, orchestras, and plays
But don’t take my word for it, here are some Holocaust survivors describing it:
Here's David Irving once again discussing Hitler’s apprehension to using nerve gas against the Allied soldiers
It’s interesting Hitler had a double standard when it came to using nerve gas against the Jews, isn’t it?
We're almost done...
This clip goes over the propaganda war after WWII, rising and falling Auschwitz death tolls, and the history of the 6 million number. But most importantly:
This shows the tactics of violence and intimidation used against deniers
Finally, let's talk about how the Holocaust narrative is used against Whites to guilt them and as a tool to increase jewish unity
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
But if I'm right, this conspiracy effects nearly every sentence that's written in the english language today
It's also a subversion of Christianity
And it's by none other than, you guessed it, the Jews
So what is this conspiracy?
Let me explain
You see, the Jews hate the Christian cross so much they created an entirely different mathematical addition symbol from the traditional addition symbol (+) so that it looks less like the Christian cross
So this made me curious: how do jews treat the lower case "t" letter, since that letter even more closely resembles the Christian cross?
There have been at least 1030 Jewish expulsions in modern recorded history
But why exactly do the Jews keep getting expelled?
To understand it, let’s take a look at the first Jewish expulsion from England in 1290
First, we need to understand that money lending at interest (known as usury) is a sin in Christianity and Islam. Yes, you read that right: the very basis of the entire contemporary Western financial system is built on a sin in the eyes of Christianity. That said, usury is not a sin for Jews, or at least it’s not a sin if Jews lend to goyim (non-Jews) at interest
Ok, back to the story of the first Jewish expulsion from England
Money lending with due interest (usury), being a sin, had been banned in England for most of England’s history until the year 1066. In that year, William the Conqueror defeated King Harold II to take the English throne. William’s conquest was largely funded by money lenders (most of whom were Jewish), and as a reward to these money lenders for helping finance his military campaign, once king, William allowed money lending at interest throughout all of England
With William’s blessing, the largely Jewish money lenders immediately began practicing usury in England…and the results were disastrous. Lands mortgaged by nobles were charged interest rates as high as 33% per year, while workmen who pledged the tools of their trade or their chattel were paying up to 300% in interest per year. Within two generations, one quarter of all English lands were in the hands of these money lenders after being reclaimed by the money lenders for lack of payment on the interest. The wealth of the money lenders was so great that the Jewish money lender Aaron of Lincoln’s wealth at the time of his death in 1186 was estimated to have exceeded that of even the king
Partially as a consequence of this money lending, taxes were also raised, and by the beginning of the 13th century many nobles were in danger of losing their land through taxation and usury. Once a noble was indebted and unable to repay the loan, the king or money lender would simply buy up the loan at a discount and confiscate the noble’s land. This practice eventually led to a revolt against King John by the nobles in the year 1215. The revolt was successful, and in 1215 King John signed the Magna Carta
The Magna Carta is a much more interesting document than we’re taught in grade school. In grade school, we’re told the Magna Carta is essentially an early European version of the American Bill of Rights; however, while somewhat true, that's misleading. If you read the Magna Carta itself, the vast majority of the document regards property ownership rights, borrowing/banking practices, and property ownership succession provisions. The Magna Carta doesn’t make much sense until you realize the nobles were having their lands seized because of usury in England, and the Magna Carta was a direct retaliation against this usury (here's a link to the full text of the Magna Carta: )
With the Magna Carta signed, tensions toward usury and the king abated for a time, and in 1216, 9-year-old King Henry III took the throne. Over his reign, Henry III even relaxed some of the restrictions against usury. However, Henry III’s heir, Edward I, saw the same issues and tensions arise from usury that had caused the Magna Carta revolt, and in 1275, he passed a statute abolishing usury in England and also requiring Jews to wear badges indicating they were Jewish. Finally, in the year 1290, King Edward issued a statute expelling the Jews from England. This statute was primarily passed because Jews were the principal group practicing usury
So, what did this expulsion of Jews and the corresponding expulsion of the practice of usury result in for England? I’m making a generalization about a few hundred years here but - disregarding the 14th century when the Great Famine occurred throughout all of Europe and was subsequently followed by the Black Death - with taxes more tolerable now that exorbitant debts were abolished, no state debt, and no interest to pay, England saw tremendous growth and prosperity. The men of the 15th century were so well paid, in fact, that their purchasing power wouldn’t be exceeded until the 19th century. The average laborer of the 15th century worked 14 weeks per year and enjoyed 160-180 days of time off work each year. All a man and his family’s needs were taken care of and they had plenty of food. With the ample amounts of free time laborers were afforded they began to volunteer their labor, and because of this, many of England’s great cathedrals were constructed at this time. This time period also saw the Elizabethan Era, which is often referred to as the golden age of England
The Jews would be allowed to return to England by Oliver Cromwell in the 1650s and the practice of usury would return with them. This would also set the stage for usury to be applied on a much larger scale with the establishment of the Bank of England
Here's King Edward's proclamation to the Exchequer detailing why he expelled the Jews from England in his own words:
"5 November 1290, King's Clipstone
To the treasurer and barons of the exchequer.
Whereas the king in his parliament at Westminster at the quinzaine of Michaelmas, in the third year of his reign, ordained that no Jew of the realm should thenceforth lend anything in usury to any Christian upon lands, rents or other things, but should earn his living by trade and labour, and the Jews afterwards, maliciously deliberating amongst themselves, changed the kind of usury into a worse, which they called 'courtesy', and depressed the king's people under colour of such by an error double that of the previous one ; wherefore the king, by reason of their errors and for the honour of Christ, has caused the Jews to leave his realm as perfidious men ; the king, not wishing to be inconsistent with his previous ordinance, but rather to imitate it, has wholly annulled all manner of pains and usury and every sort thereof that may be exacted from any Christians of the realm for any reasons whatever by reason of Jewry for any times whatsoever, willing that nothing shall be exacted from the Christians except the principal debts that they received from the Jews ; of which debts he wills that the amount shall be verified before the treasurer and barons by the oath of three Christians, and that they shall be then paid to the king at suitable terms to be appointed by the treasurer and barons."