This launch follows HMS Vanguard overhaul, and therefore is part of a Demonstration And Shake down Operation (DASO). It aims at certifying a SSBN crew and weapon system for future strategic deployments (patrols). The whole system is tested, culminating with missile launch.
Many tracking assets will be involved, on land, in the air and at sea. Among mobile assets, the most important will be USNS Waters acting as the Launch Area Support Ship (LASS), and USNS Pathfinder at reentry area acting fitted with the Navy Mobile Instrumentation System (NMIS).
The SSBN HMS Vanguard is fitted with special systems in order to collect data on and around SSBN environment during launch.
We can see one of the probable probe on a beautiful pic. taken today while HMS Vanguard was leaving Port Cape Canaveral to go to launch area
Two ways communications, incl. data and voice, with USNS Waters/LASS and aircraft such as P-8 are allowed thanks to Buoyant Cable communication System (BCS). At least two P-8 are currently flying over launch area.
6000 km away (for this test) is station TAGS-60 USNS Pathfinder survey ship, equipped with the NMIS. This set consists of several equipment such as two tracking radars (X & C-band), optics, telemetry and weather systems.
For safety reasons, the ship remains ~25 nm from expected reentry zone. In order to evaluate RV (reentry vehicles, or bodies, or warheads) accuracy, a Portable Impact Location System was developed. It consists of 9 to 12 acoustic buoys + 3 communication relay buoys.
The com. relay buoys can collect RV telemetry from 3 RV (MIRV) spaced 12 sec in time from reentry until splashdown in the ocean. Spectrogram below shows such telemetry from a real test. Signal is lost ~35km (altitude) / 9s before impact due to plasma generated ...
... by hypersonic speed when reaching dense atmosphere.
Signal comes back ~2,6km / 2s before impact.
This gives an average speed of 3,8 km/s, explaining why it's REALLY hard (almost impossible) to intercept such a warhead with point defense systems such as Patriot or SAMP/T.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/🚀Shooting across the Globe without harming the seals - How #Russia is planning its longest ICBM test ever🚀
Thanks once again to the amazing @La_souris_DA , we now know that Moscow intend to launch a #SARMAT heavy ICBM up to the Southern Pacific, almost a 15 000 km range👇
2/ While most Russian (and before Soviet) intercontinental missile (SLBM & ICBM) tests are targeting areas in or close to Russia, some of them have been launched in the past far in the Pacific in order to test missiles at (or close to) their max. range.
3/ One of the longest range achieved so far (not counting R-36O FOBS) was in 2008, when a R-29RM SINEVA SLBM was launched from Barents sea toward the equatorial region of the Pacific, flying 11 547 km.
2/7 While all of the previous tests were carried off the coast of California, this one happened in the Marshall Islands in the Pacific. HALO51, an MDA electro-optic aircraft was deployed in Honolulu to monitor the test.
3/7 On Oct. 12th, HALO51 took of at 07:10 UTC toward the Marshall Islands. @callsignmangust and @thenewarea51 were able to monitore coms of a B-52H callsign TORCH20 going toward Hawaii the same day. It probably flew ~6600 km to reach the launch point.
1/8 #Russia: 9M723/#Iskander trajectories - beyond the myth.
In January, rafal9820, an anonymous contributor of @github, published an detailed study on the different trajectories of the aeroballistic #missile, that shares a lot with #Kinzhal missile.
2/8 The following analysis is based on this study. While the number seem consistent, I am not an expert in ballistic physics. A more in-depth peer review would be very interesting, and could lead to a similar study for Kinzhal.
cc @wslafoy @ArmsControlWonk @tomkarako @Pataramesh
3/8 One of the most important conclusion is that Iskander almost always stays below 100km altitude. Only trajectories longer than 500 km would imply crossing this limit. 9M723/Iskander being INF compliant trajectories beyond 500 km are probably not used for operational missions.