🧵OK, Mayorkas's impeachment: 1st 5 charges are Mayorkas not complying with various detention mandates, even though Congress has not funded this mandate and it would be unconstitutional detain everyone without feeding them. Even sleep deprivation conditions are unconstitutional:
They say his enforcement priorities that are mandated by 6 U.S. Code § 202 are illegal and cite a 5th circuit decision from 2022 that was *reversed by the Supreme Court*.
Oh, and guess what? Mayorkas in his first 2 years was less likely to release migrants than Trump's DHS secretaries were in his last 2 years, despite a massive increase in the flow. Charging Mayorkas over this is comical. cato.org/blog/new-data-…
They erroneously claim that Biden is abusing his parole authority, and look at this, they cite another 5th circuit decision REVERSED by SCOTUS. Here's SCOTUS direct refutation of this claim
Mayorkas is also charged with using parole to let in too many *legally*. Congress granted Mayorkas the power to decide whether to grant parole, and it's been used at least 126 times just like this by people in his position. Absolute madness: cato.org/blog/126-parol…
That's IT for the "law violations". Then you have the weakest possible charges: vague expressions that the border is "secure" or "closed" are perjury? Come on... Border Patrol caught a higher % now than almost any year. Is it a LIE to say that's "secure"?
Mayorkas terminating Trump policies is now impeachable! Even though SCOTUS said that he can end those policies, so they are not "statutory duties." Oh, and ending a policy that was removing 33/day didn't cause the border crisis. Give me a break!
Mayorkas terminated contracts for Trump's entirely pointless wall that is cut through a dozen times every single day and imposes more costs on Border Patrol and has even helped smugglers, but that's impeachable b/c he went against Trump! cato.org/blog/border-wa…
Oh, and this is extra funny b/c it was Trump's DHS that illegally took money from the DOD to build the wall
AND now with the final charge, we've left the realm of reality: Mayorkas didn't even end the asylum cooperative agreements that were basically never used! Oops wrong secretary. I guess they'll have to go back and impeach Blinken too b/c sure, why not?
So we've got citations to overturned court cases. We've got actions that Mayorkas never took. We've got demands that he detain people unconstitutionally. They want him to block *legal* entries, so more people cross illegally. They had 3 years to pull this together!
Mayorkas has made many mistakes, but it is nothing like the slew of illegal, unconstitutional, and immoral actions taken during the 4 years of the Trump admin, which resulted in the total destruction of the immigration system. This case is a joke.
As I testified: "More than 30 times, courts found that the prior administration’s policies were implemented illegally, but the assault was so relentless that many changes were not stopped. Nearly every single area of immigration law had been shredded." cato.org/testimony/bide…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Today @CatoInstitute published our report providing the first look at the fiscal effects of the wave of legal & illegal immigration over the last 3 decades. It shows immigrants created surpluses every year, by a combined $14.5 trillion, even as deficits grew
Our report covers all spending, federal, state, and local, updating the work of the National Academies' 2017 report. You can read my summary: cato.org/blog/cato-stud…
Or the full study: cato.org/white-paper/im…
How can new people cut the deficit? First, a significant portion of spending is "pure public goods," military & interest payments on old debt, that don't increase b/c of immigrants. This means the average new person is paying more in taxes than they receive in benefits...
Another judge describes how ICE intentionally brake checks ICE observers trying to cause accidents. If the observers can't stop in time, it can then label them "domestic terrorists" who "weaponized their vehicles," which is of course justification for killing them.
Here's an agent admitting on camera to this behavior:
In 2025, @AlexNowrasteh and @CatoInstitute published an enormous amount of original immigration research. My analysis of border crossings under Biden is the most comprehensive explanation for why Biden's lack of enforcement didn't cause the crisis: alexnowrasteh.com/p/biden-didnt-…
In my 1st Trump 2.0 post, I predicted that Trump would cut legal entries more than illegal entries, which has already been proven indisputably correct. cato.org/blog/trump-wil…
@AlexNowrasteh published the only paper analyzing the monetary amount of welfare received by immigration status, finding that immigrants received in 2022 21 percent less welfare per capita than the US-born population cato.org/briefing-paper…
ICE agents illegally break into a woman's bathroom in a NY nutrition bar manufacturing plant. "Pull up your pants," says a male agent. The agents only had a warrant to review employer documents. They didn't have a warrant to search for, detain, or arrest anyone there.
Agents illegally detained dozens of US citizens and demanded that they prove their citizenship. We need to defend our private property rights against trespassing government agents.
Utterly lawless: "Agents lined up Latino workers and released people they said were U.S. citizens. They questioned and detained 57 people, including people who said only that they wanted a lawyer." syracuse.com/news/2025/11/w…
On Dec. 4, DOJ labeled people who impede or "dox" ICE agents "domestic terrorists." I document how DHS believes following, recording, and protesting agents is "impeding," and has a policy of threatening & arresting ICE observers. That's unconstitutional. A thread of threats...🧵
The Constitution guarantees your right to follow, record, protest, and notify others about the agents and what you see. These are core First Amendment rights, and DHS has clearly ordered its agents to threaten and violate those rights. cato.org/blog/dhs-polic…
DHS agents have: 1) a policy of threatening to arrest ICE observers; 2) a policy of permitting the brandishing of weapons against ICE observers; 3) a policy of arresting ICE observers for honking; and 4) a policy of crashing into drivers who follow them.