🧵OK, Mayorkas's impeachment: 1st 5 charges are Mayorkas not complying with various detention mandates, even though Congress has not funded this mandate and it would be unconstitutional detain everyone without feeding them. Even sleep deprivation conditions are unconstitutional:
They say his enforcement priorities that are mandated by 6 U.S. Code § 202 are illegal and cite a 5th circuit decision from 2022 that was *reversed by the Supreme Court*.
Oh, and guess what? Mayorkas in his first 2 years was less likely to release migrants than Trump's DHS secretaries were in his last 2 years, despite a massive increase in the flow. Charging Mayorkas over this is comical. cato.org/blog/new-data-…
They erroneously claim that Biden is abusing his parole authority, and look at this, they cite another 5th circuit decision REVERSED by SCOTUS. Here's SCOTUS direct refutation of this claim
Mayorkas is also charged with using parole to let in too many *legally*. Congress granted Mayorkas the power to decide whether to grant parole, and it's been used at least 126 times just like this by people in his position. Absolute madness: cato.org/blog/126-parol…
That's IT for the "law violations". Then you have the weakest possible charges: vague expressions that the border is "secure" or "closed" are perjury? Come on... Border Patrol caught a higher % now than almost any year. Is it a LIE to say that's "secure"?
Mayorkas terminating Trump policies is now impeachable! Even though SCOTUS said that he can end those policies, so they are not "statutory duties." Oh, and ending a policy that was removing 33/day didn't cause the border crisis. Give me a break!
Mayorkas terminated contracts for Trump's entirely pointless wall that is cut through a dozen times every single day and imposes more costs on Border Patrol and has even helped smugglers, but that's impeachable b/c he went against Trump! cato.org/blog/border-wa…
Oh, and this is extra funny b/c it was Trump's DHS that illegally took money from the DOD to build the wall
AND now with the final charge, we've left the realm of reality: Mayorkas didn't even end the asylum cooperative agreements that were basically never used! Oops wrong secretary. I guess they'll have to go back and impeach Blinken too b/c sure, why not?
So we've got citations to overturned court cases. We've got actions that Mayorkas never took. We've got demands that he detain people unconstitutionally. They want him to block *legal* entries, so more people cross illegally. They had 3 years to pull this together!
Mayorkas has made many mistakes, but it is nothing like the slew of illegal, unconstitutional, and immoral actions taken during the 4 years of the Trump admin, which resulted in the total destruction of the immigration system. This case is a joke.
As I testified: "More than 30 times, courts found that the prior administration’s policies were implemented illegally, but the assault was so relentless that many changes were not stopped. Nearly every single area of immigration law had been shredded." cato.org/testimony/bide…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Courts have found that DHS has repeatedly violated 4th Amendment. In Garrison G. v. Bondi, the Court found DHS violated Garrison’s 4th amendment right by entering his home without a judicial warrant. He was one of several victims of MN home invasions storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
In USA v. Juarez-Lopez, the Court found DHS detained numerous employees of a NY manufacturing plant without basis. The only reason we know about it is b/c DHS tried to criminally charge Juarez-Lopez, and the judge suppressed the evidence storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
The NY raid occurred AFTER DHS tried and failed to secure a judicial warrant in a similar case in Texas to go into a business without probable cause to interrogate the workers about their status. Undeterred, DHS went ahead with no relevant warrant in NY cases.justia.com/federal/distri…
Courts have found DHS has violated the First Amendment many times, in different contexts. In LA Press Club v. Noem, the Ninth Circuit found that DHS regularly assaults people for peacefully protesting and observing its activities. aclusocal.org/cases/la-press…
In Suri v. Trump, the 4th Circuit found that DHS retaliated against a Georgetown post-doctoral scholar and teacher by arresting him for his online speech. ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/25156…
In Ozturk v. Trump, the Court found that DHS arrested a college student for writing an op-ed, which was "at the very least, a substantial claim of a First Amendment violation" sufficient to justify release from custody. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/US…
A man called the Palm Beach County police to get a welfare check on his 4-year-old daughter, and instead, they tackled him, tased him, and arrested him being an asylum applicant. "Too f**king bad!" one deputy screamed. Local cops following ICE's playbook for $$.
“He just wanted to know about his daughter,” his girlfriend cried. “Why would you guys do this?”The deputy who arrested Sanchez Toledo was part of the sheriff’s office’s 287(g) Task Force that allows police to enforce immigration law. themarshallproject.org/2026/05/11/flo…
ICE bribes the localities to make arrests. The localities lie to the public about what their goals and duties are because that's what ICE has trained them to do. themarshallproject.org/2026/05/11/flo…
One in four people raised Muslim have left Islam, which means that all polls of Muslim opinion substantially understate the degree of Muslim immigrant assimilation since leaving Islam is a type of assimilation. In my post today I document how big this bias...
Muslims who were raised Muslim (not converts) basically look like Evangelical Christians, with gay acceptance being underwater by 21 points. But looking at all people raised Muslim completely eliminates this 21-point deficit because ex-Muslims are so liberal.
As we would expect, Muslim immigrant assimilation continues across generations, with each generation more favorable than the prior generation, especially when including ex-Muslims. This understates the trend b/c we don't have the children of ex-Muslims who are not raised Muslim.
Today @CatoInstitute published our report providing the first look at the fiscal effects of the wave of legal & illegal immigration over the last 3 decades. It shows immigrants created surpluses every year, by a combined $14.5 trillion, even as deficits grew
Our report covers all spending, federal, state, and local, updating the work of the National Academies' 2017 report. You can read my summary: cato.org/blog/cato-stud…
Or the full study: cato.org/white-paper/im…
How can new people cut the deficit? First, a significant portion of spending is "pure public goods," military & interest payments on old debt, that don't increase b/c of immigrants. This means the average new person is paying more in taxes than they receive in benefits...