This is a shocking exposure of how the BBC has been captured and disciplined by government minders. It might explain why, almost every day, the BBC still lets corporate lobbyists from Tufton Street junktanks pose as independent, objective commentators.🧵prospectmagazine.co.uk/ideas/media/64…
This is in direct contravention of the BBC’s own editorial guidelines. It breaches them day after day. Almost the only times when these corporate lobbyists are held to account is when guests challenge them about the way they hide their funding.
I don’t want to have to do this. I want to get on and argue about the issues. But transparency is essential to democracy, and when corporations and oligarchs can get what they want by hiding behind their secretly-funded lobbyists, we are all the poorer for it.
Poorer in all sorts of ways. Especially since these dark-money junktanks, through their pet Prime Minister Liz Truss, trashed so many people’s lives. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
But it's as if none of it happened. Immediately after the crisis *they had caused*, the BBC invited these tossers onto its programmes, not to hold them to account, but to get their independent, objective views on whose fault it was (not theirs, obvs), and what needed to be done.
I wrote this at the time.
"I’m sure there’s more to this story than we yet know. It’s hard to believe how freely the BBC breaks its own rules to promote and normalise an extreme neoliberal cult."
Now, thanks to @arusbridger's article, we have an answer theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
It's time for @BBCNews and @BBCPolitics to stop pretending none of this is happening and start engaging with the fact that they keep breaking their own guidelines.
This is #InstitutionalBias.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The UK government's criminalisation of rough sleeping, now passing through Parliament in the Criminal Justice Bill, is overseen by a Prime Minister who owns four luxury homes for his own use. One of them, in Kensington, is reserved for accommodating family guests.🧵
"In its majestic equality, the law forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal loaves of bread." Anatole France
What we are seeing play out in the UK, in ever more extreme forms, is class war. The war being waged by the rich against the poor.
I thought the flirtation with far right themes arose from naivity and audience capture. But now that Vandana Shiva, once a hero of the green left, is repeatedly reposting far right accounts, I wonder what the hell is going on. @drvandanashiva, please explain. 🧵
Anyone can see how the far right is cynically homing in on the farmers' protests, exploiting them in exactly the same way as they did in the 1920s. Anyone with knowledge of history knows how staggeringly dangerous this is.
The historian Robert Paxton points out that “It was in the countryside that both Mussolini and Hitler won their first mass following, and it was angry farmers who provided their first mass constituency.”
1. This week’s column is about how the far right is successfully exploiting farmers’ protests across Europe and the US, to build its base. This is in no way to tar all the farmers' protests with this brush. But it’s an extremely dangerous moment.
2. The historian Robert Paxton points out that “It was in the countryside that both Mussolini and Hitler won their first mass following, and it was angry farmers who provided their first mass constituency.”
3. Today’s far right is trying to follow the same path, mobilising a new agrarian populism. Across several European countries and in the US, there are signs that it’s succeeding. The Capitol attack was inspired to a large extent by the outcomes of a fascistic agrarian revolt.
You would think this was a wild and improbable conspiracy theory. But every fact in this column is checked and verified.
How the Atlas Network’s dark-money junktanks steer policy around the world. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
What's so frustrating is that endless reams of nonsense are published about fictitious conspiracies involving the World Economic Forum etc, while the real stuff is scarcely mentioned.
The WEF is a perfect distraction. It's a plausible villain: a plutocrats' club with a plutocratic agenda. But unlike the junktank network, it doesn't shape government platforms, doesn't write govt policy, doesn't populate govt offices and doesn't occupy the media day in, day out.
A Happy New Year to you all.
It’s going to be a challenging one.
The ongoing massacre in Gaza
Accelerating environmental breakdown
Trump’s bid for the White House ….
Those of us who want a better world will have to work even harder than before.
🧵 1/9
And we'll need thick skins. When we object to environmental destruction or ill-treatment of human beings, we're often accused of being “snowflakes” or “melts”. In reality, you need endless courage and resilience to keep confronting assaults on humanity and the living planet. 2/9
While humanitarianism requires sensitivity to the needs of others, we have to become insensitive to the insults and abuse that come our way. By contrast, those who accuse us of being snowflakes often turn out to be super-sensitive. 3/9
This is 1930s-style fascism, with the added twist that Milei is a creature of the Atlas Network, a confederation of rightwing junktanks funded by some of the world's grimmest oligarchs and corporations. What they are getting in Argentina is what they want everywhere.
Be warned.
It's always the same story with fascism. It's a front for the interests of the very rich, shutting down opposition, deregulating their predatory activities, handing the control of state assets.
We're not immune. The IEA is a founder member of the Atlas Network. It attempted a polite British version through its glove puppet, Liz Truss. Now, thanks to our complicit media, it's all over the airwaves, pushing the same agenda for the same interests.